How Does Regulation Affect the Risk Taking of Banks? A U.S. and Canadian Perspective

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Pub Date : 2001-06-01 DOI:10.1080/13876980108412654
J. Hendrickson, Mark W. Nichols
{"title":"How Does Regulation Affect the Risk Taking of Banks? A U.S. and Canadian Perspective","authors":"J. Hendrickson, Mark W. Nichols","doi":"10.1080/13876980108412654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This historical study utilizes annual insured bank data from 1936 through 1989 to empirically evaluate the impact of bank regulation on bank risk taking in a cross-country comparison of the United States and Canada. Risk is hypothesized to be determined, in part, by the regulatory environment in which a bank operates. The findings of this analysis contributes to the contemporary deregulation policy debate, since both branch banking restrictions and deposit insurance variables are found to be detrimental to bank stability. More specifically, these results support the 1994 Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act, which removed legislative barriers to interstate branching. These results also confirm expectations that deposit insurance increases risk taking and supports the 1991 mandate by regulators that risk-based deposit insurance be created. Further, these findings support the 1988 Basel Accord to standardize bank capital requirements internationally and to link these standards to bank risk taking.","PeriodicalId":47229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","volume":"3 1","pages":"59-83"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13876980108412654","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980108412654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This historical study utilizes annual insured bank data from 1936 through 1989 to empirically evaluate the impact of bank regulation on bank risk taking in a cross-country comparison of the United States and Canada. Risk is hypothesized to be determined, in part, by the regulatory environment in which a bank operates. The findings of this analysis contributes to the contemporary deregulation policy debate, since both branch banking restrictions and deposit insurance variables are found to be detrimental to bank stability. More specifically, these results support the 1994 Riegle–Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act, which removed legislative barriers to interstate branching. These results also confirm expectations that deposit insurance increases risk taking and supports the 1991 mandate by regulators that risk-based deposit insurance be created. Further, these findings support the 1988 Basel Accord to standardize bank capital requirements internationally and to link these standards to bank risk taking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监管如何影响银行的风险承担?美国和加拿大的视角
本历史研究利用1936年至1989年的年度保险银行数据,在美国和加拿大的跨国比较中实证评估银行监管对银行风险承担的影响。假设风险部分取决于银行所处的监管环境。这一分析的结果有助于当代放松管制政策的辩论,因为分行银行限制和存款保险变量都被发现对银行稳定有害。更具体地说,这些结果支持了1994年的Riegle-Neal州际银行和分支效率法案,该法案消除了州际分支的立法障碍。这些结果也证实了存款保险会增加风险承担的预期,并支持了1991年监管机构提出的建立基于风险的存款保险的要求。此外,这些发现支持1988年《巴塞尔协议》在国际上标准化银行资本要求,并将这些标准与银行风险承担联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Peace and Conflict: Alternative Strategies of Governance and Conflict Resolution Judicial Review and the Allocation of Health Care Resources in Canada and the United Kingdom The Governance of Fiscal Policy in the United Kingdom and Canada Governance and Popular Involvement in Local Antipoverty Strategies in the U.K. and the Netherlands Analyzing Global Governance Failure: A Philosophical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1