A peer-led kinesthetic forearm and wrist anatomy workshop: A multiple cohort study

IF 5.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Anatomical Sciences Education Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1002/ase.2268
Jordana Herblum, Jesse Honig, Madison Kasoff, Jennifer Koestler, Daniel Catano, Kristina H. Petersen
{"title":"A peer-led kinesthetic forearm and wrist anatomy workshop: A multiple cohort study","authors":"Jordana Herblum,&nbsp;Jesse Honig,&nbsp;Madison Kasoff,&nbsp;Jennifer Koestler,&nbsp;Daniel Catano,&nbsp;Kristina H. Petersen","doi":"10.1002/ase.2268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An understanding of forearm and wrist anatomy is necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of various injuries. Evidence supports the use of peer-assisted learning (PAL) as an effective resource for teaching basic science courses. First-year medical students across three class years participated in an optional PAL kinesthetic workshop wherein participants created anatomically accurate paper models of forearm and wrist muscles. Participants completed pre- and post-workshop surveys. Participant and nonparticipant exam performances were compared. Participation ranged from 17.3% to 33.2% of each class; participants were more likely to identify as women than men (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Participants in cohorts 2 and 3 reported increased comfort with relevant content after the workshop (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Survey responses for cohort 1 were omitted due to low response rates; however, exam performances were assessed for all three cohorts. Cohort 2 participants scored higher than nonparticipants on forearm and wrist questions on the cumulative course exam (<i>p</i> = 0.010), while the opposite was found for cohort 3 (<i>p</i> = 0.051). No other statistically significant differences were observed. This is the first study to examine quantitative and qualitative results for a PAL intervention repeated for three separate cohorts. Although academic performance varied, two cohorts reported increased comfort with relevant course material after the workshop. Results of this study support the need for further exploration of PAL workshops as an instructional method in teaching anatomy and highlight the challenges associated with repeating interventions over multiple years. As more studies attempt replication across multiple years, these challenges may be addressed, thereby informing PAL best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":124,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical Sciences Education","volume":"16 4","pages":"694-705"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ase.2268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An understanding of forearm and wrist anatomy is necessary for the diagnosis and treatment of various injuries. Evidence supports the use of peer-assisted learning (PAL) as an effective resource for teaching basic science courses. First-year medical students across three class years participated in an optional PAL kinesthetic workshop wherein participants created anatomically accurate paper models of forearm and wrist muscles. Participants completed pre- and post-workshop surveys. Participant and nonparticipant exam performances were compared. Participation ranged from 17.3% to 33.2% of each class; participants were more likely to identify as women than men (p < 0.001). Participants in cohorts 2 and 3 reported increased comfort with relevant content after the workshop (p < 0.001). Survey responses for cohort 1 were omitted due to low response rates; however, exam performances were assessed for all three cohorts. Cohort 2 participants scored higher than nonparticipants on forearm and wrist questions on the cumulative course exam (p = 0.010), while the opposite was found for cohort 3 (p = 0.051). No other statistically significant differences were observed. This is the first study to examine quantitative and qualitative results for a PAL intervention repeated for three separate cohorts. Although academic performance varied, two cohorts reported increased comfort with relevant course material after the workshop. Results of this study support the need for further exploration of PAL workshops as an instructional method in teaching anatomy and highlight the challenges associated with repeating interventions over multiple years. As more studies attempt replication across multiple years, these challenges may be addressed, thereby informing PAL best practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同行领导的动觉前臂和手腕解剖研讨会:一项多队列研究
了解前臂和手腕的解剖结构对各种损伤的诊断和治疗是必要的。证据支持使用同伴辅助学习(PAL)作为基础科学课程教学的有效资源。三年级的一年级医学生参加了一个可选的PAL动觉工作坊,参与者在其中创建了前臂和手腕肌肉的解剖精确的纸模型。参与者完成了研讨会前和研讨会后的调查。比较参与者和非参与者的考试成绩。每个班级的参与率从17.3%到33.2%不等;参与者更倾向于认为自己是女性而不是男性(p < 0.001)。第2组和第3组的参与者报告在研讨会后对相关内容的适应程度增加(p < 0.001)。由于应答率低,队列1的调查应答被省略;然而,对所有三个队列的考试成绩进行了评估。在累积课程考试中,队列2的参与者在前臂和手腕问题上的得分高于非参与者(p = 0.010),而队列3的情况正好相反(p = 0.051)。未观察到其他统计学上的显著差异。这是第一个对三个独立队列重复PAL干预的定量和定性结果进行检验的研究。尽管学习成绩各不相同,但有两个队列报告在研讨会后对相关课程材料的适应程度有所提高。本研究的结果支持了进一步探索PAL工作坊作为解剖学教学方法的必要性,并强调了多年重复干预所带来的挑战。随着越来越多的研究试图在多年内复制,这些挑战可能会得到解决,从而为PAL提供最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anatomical Sciences Education
Anatomical Sciences Education Anatomy/education-
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
39.70%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Anatomical Sciences Education, affiliated with the American Association for Anatomy, serves as an international platform for sharing ideas, innovations, and research related to education in anatomical sciences. Covering gross anatomy, embryology, histology, and neurosciences, the journal addresses education at various levels, including undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate, allied health, medical (both allopathic and osteopathic), and dental. It fosters collaboration and discussion in the field of anatomical sciences education.
期刊最新文献
Refocusing graduate gross anatomy training: Curating future content experts. Anatomical Sciences Education Vol. 17, Issue 8, 2024 Cover Image Editorial Board and Table of Contents Comparing assisting technologies for proficiency in cardiac morphology: 3D printing and mixed reality versus CT slice images for morphological understanding of congenital heart defects by medical students. Effect of peer facilitation in anatomy small group curriculum on academic performance and retention: A pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1