Challenges in preventative care and research in primary healthcare facilities: information obtained during implementation of a cervical cancer screening project in the Tshwane Health District

IF 0.1 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20742835.2013.11441216
G. Dreyer, E. F. Mnisi, A. Maphalala
{"title":"Challenges in preventative care and research in primary healthcare facilities: information obtained during implementation of a cervical cancer screening project in the Tshwane Health District","authors":"G. Dreyer, E. F. Mnisi, A. Maphalala","doi":"10.1080/20742835.2013.11441216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: The aim was to identify challenges to conducting research and obstacles to successful cervical cancer screening in public sector primary healthcare clinics (PHCs). Design: Qualitative research was conducted, using semi-structured interviews. Setting and subjects: Study staff and healthcare workers involved in the implementation of a large screening study conducted in existing primary healthcare facilities were interviewed during the study period. Outcome measures: The outcome measure was qualitative data on problems and obstacles to research and cervical cancer screening in public health facilities. Results: Twenty-one participants were interviewed at intervals over three years. It was found that clinical research could only be conducted in PHC facilities if no additional burden was placed on the staff or facilities. Preventative care was not found to be part of the focus of the clinics, which rather concentrated on disease. The need for gynaecological examinations was identified as an important obstacle to screening at PHC clinics. Self-sampling was widely accepted, as was cervical sampling for human papillomavirus. Reporting of screening results to patients presented a huge challenge to PHC facilities. Ineffective communication of the results was identified as another major obstacle to effective screening. Conclusion: Future cervical cancer screening methods should include sampling, without the need for an intimate examination. Finding new ways of calling women in for structured screening at regular intervals and reporting the results to them requires urgent attention.","PeriodicalId":41638,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","volume":"5 1","pages":"S10 - S14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2013.11441216","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2013.11441216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Objectives: The aim was to identify challenges to conducting research and obstacles to successful cervical cancer screening in public sector primary healthcare clinics (PHCs). Design: Qualitative research was conducted, using semi-structured interviews. Setting and subjects: Study staff and healthcare workers involved in the implementation of a large screening study conducted in existing primary healthcare facilities were interviewed during the study period. Outcome measures: The outcome measure was qualitative data on problems and obstacles to research and cervical cancer screening in public health facilities. Results: Twenty-one participants were interviewed at intervals over three years. It was found that clinical research could only be conducted in PHC facilities if no additional burden was placed on the staff or facilities. Preventative care was not found to be part of the focus of the clinics, which rather concentrated on disease. The need for gynaecological examinations was identified as an important obstacle to screening at PHC clinics. Self-sampling was widely accepted, as was cervical sampling for human papillomavirus. Reporting of screening results to patients presented a huge challenge to PHC facilities. Ineffective communication of the results was identified as another major obstacle to effective screening. Conclusion: Future cervical cancer screening methods should include sampling, without the need for an intimate examination. Finding new ways of calling women in for structured screening at regular intervals and reporting the results to them requires urgent attention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健设施预防保健和研究方面的挑战:在茨瓦内卫生区执行宫颈癌筛查项目期间获得的信息
摘要目的:目的是确定挑战进行研究和障碍成功宫颈癌筛查在公共部门初级保健诊所(PHCs)。设计:采用半结构化访谈进行定性研究。环境和对象:在研究期间,研究人员和参与在现有初级卫生保健设施实施大型筛查研究的卫生保健工作者进行了访谈。结果措施:结果措施是关于公共卫生设施研究和宫颈癌筛查的问题和障碍的定性数据。结果:21名参与者在三年的时间间隔内接受了采访。研究发现,只有在不给工作人员或设施增加额外负担的情况下,临床研究才能在初级保健设施进行。预防保健并不是诊所工作重点的一部分,而是侧重于疾病。需要妇科检查被认为是在初级保健诊所进行筛查的一个重要障碍。自取样被广泛接受,宫颈乳头瘤病毒取样也被广泛接受。向患者报告筛查结果对初级保健机构来说是一个巨大的挑战。结果的无效沟通被认为是有效筛查的另一个主要障碍。结论:未来的宫颈癌筛查方法应包括抽样,而不需要进行详细检查。寻找新的方法,定期召集妇女进行有组织的筛查,并向她们报告结果,这需要迫切关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Retrospective review of 37.4 Gy in 11 fractions for the palliation of advanced cervical cancer Challenges managing women with suspected Lynch Syndrome in Zimbabwe: a case report A retrospective study comparing the efficiency of recurrent LSIL cytology to high-grade cytology as predictors of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN2+) A retrospective study of the epidemiology and histological subtypes of ovarian epithelial neoplasms at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection in carcinoma of the vulva: experience and intermediate results at one institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1