Where are the dead of medieval battles? A preliminary survey

IF 0.5 0 ARCHAEOLOGY Journal of Conflict Archaeology Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1080/15740773.2017.1324675
A. Curry, G. Foard
{"title":"Where are the dead of medieval battles? A preliminary survey","authors":"A. Curry, G. Foard","doi":"10.1080/15740773.2017.1324675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Only a handful of mass graves from late medieval battles in Western Europe have been subject to large scale excavation to modern standards. The principal reason is that these, and indeed even early modern battlefield graves, have proven extremely elusive, most being identified by chance. Despite a few successes, no combination of prospecting techniques yet provides a consistently effective method of locating such small archaeological features set almost anywhere within a site covering many square kilometres. But this important resource should be explored and conserved for, as Towton has shown, much can be learnt through modern excavation and analysis of the remains. While this paper does consider the existing archaeological record, its primary focus and the starting point for almost any search for mass graves on a battlefield, has to be the documentary record. Using this evidence one must debate the number who actually died, how they were interred and commemorated and whether this varied according to status or allegiance, and where on the battlefield the graves might lie. One must also consider how often we will need to look further afield for the dead, for it is unclear how often the desire for appropriate Christian burial meant some or even most were interred in, or later moved to, consecrated ground.","PeriodicalId":53987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conflict Archaeology","volume":"11 1","pages":"61 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15740773.2017.1324675","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conflict Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15740773.2017.1324675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Only a handful of mass graves from late medieval battles in Western Europe have been subject to large scale excavation to modern standards. The principal reason is that these, and indeed even early modern battlefield graves, have proven extremely elusive, most being identified by chance. Despite a few successes, no combination of prospecting techniques yet provides a consistently effective method of locating such small archaeological features set almost anywhere within a site covering many square kilometres. But this important resource should be explored and conserved for, as Towton has shown, much can be learnt through modern excavation and analysis of the remains. While this paper does consider the existing archaeological record, its primary focus and the starting point for almost any search for mass graves on a battlefield, has to be the documentary record. Using this evidence one must debate the number who actually died, how they were interred and commemorated and whether this varied according to status or allegiance, and where on the battlefield the graves might lie. One must also consider how often we will need to look further afield for the dead, for it is unclear how often the desire for appropriate Christian burial meant some or even most were interred in, or later moved to, consecrated ground.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中世纪战争的死者在哪里?初步调查
在西欧,只有少数中世纪晚期战争时期的万人坑经过了符合现代标准的大规模挖掘。主要原因是,这些,甚至是早期的现代战场上的坟墓,已经被证明是极其难以捉摸的,大多数是偶然发现的。尽管取得了一些成功,但目前还没有一种综合勘探技术能够提供一种持续有效的方法,来定位在占地许多平方公里的遗址内几乎任何地方的这种小型考古特征。但是这个重要的资源应该被探索和保护,正如陶顿所展示的,通过对遗骸的现代挖掘和分析,我们可以学到很多东西。虽然本文确实考虑了现有的考古记录,但它的主要焦点和几乎任何在战场上寻找万人坑的起点都必须是文献记录。根据这些证据,我们必须讨论实际死亡的人数,他们是如何被埋葬和纪念的,以及这是否因地位或效忠而有所不同,以及战场上的坟墓可能在哪里。我们还必须考虑到,我们需要多长时间去更远的地方寻找死者,因为目前还不清楚,对适当的基督教葬礼的渴望意味着,一些甚至大多数人被埋葬在或后来被转移到圣地的频率有多高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Journal of Conflict Archaeology is an English-language journal devoted to the battlefield and military archaeology and other spheres of conflict archaeology, covering all periods with a worldwide scope. Additional spheres of interest will include the archaeology of industrial and popular protest; contested landscapes and monuments; nationalism and colonialism; class conflict; the origins of conflict; forensic applications in war-zones; and human rights cases. Themed issues will carry papers on current research; subject and period overviews; fieldwork and excavation reports-interim and final reports; artifact studies; scientific applications; technique evaluations; conference summaries; and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Where does the dust settle? Archaeological analysis of the remains of Italian military structures from the period of World War II in Obrovac, Croatia British glass consumption during World war one in the Ypres Salient (Belgium): an archaeological contribution The truth, the whole truth? Or anything but the truth ‘Tankography’ of the first battle of Bullecourt: archival sources as tools to locate battlefield sites of tank wrecks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1