The AMA Guides functional vision score is a better predictor of vision-targeted quality of life than traditional measures of visual acuity or visual field extent

P. Fuhr, LaShandra Holmes, D. C. Fletcher, M. Swanson, T. Kuyk
{"title":"The AMA Guides functional vision score is a better predictor of vision-targeted quality of life than traditional measures of visual acuity or visual field extent","authors":"P. Fuhr, LaShandra Holmes, D. C. Fletcher, M. Swanson, T. Kuyk","doi":"10.1080/1388235039048690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if combining visual acuity (VA) and visual field (VF) measures in the manner proposed in the 1999 Guide for the Evaluation of Visual Impairment1and incorporated into the 5thEdition of AMA Guides for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment2(Guide) would be more predictive of self-reported vision-targeted quality of life than standard vision measures of VA or VF alone. DESIGN: Visual function and quality of life (QOL) were assessed in 200 visually impaired individuals. Tests included visual acuities, visual fields, and vision specific QOL using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ). Visual acuities and visual fields were scored in the usual manner and then rescored using methodology proposed in the Guide to derive measures of functional vision. Relationships among the visual function, functional vision and QOL outcomes variables were determined using correlation and stepwise regression analyses RESULTS: High correlations were ...","PeriodicalId":88340,"journal":{"name":"Visual impairment research","volume":"5 1","pages":"137-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1388235039048690","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual impairment research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1388235039048690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if combining visual acuity (VA) and visual field (VF) measures in the manner proposed in the 1999 Guide for the Evaluation of Visual Impairment1and incorporated into the 5thEdition of AMA Guides for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment2(Guide) would be more predictive of self-reported vision-targeted quality of life than standard vision measures of VA or VF alone. DESIGN: Visual function and quality of life (QOL) were assessed in 200 visually impaired individuals. Tests included visual acuities, visual fields, and vision specific QOL using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ). Visual acuities and visual fields were scored in the usual manner and then rescored using methodology proposed in the Guide to derive measures of functional vision. Relationships among the visual function, functional vision and QOL outcomes variables were determined using correlation and stepwise regression analyses RESULTS: High correlations were ...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AMA指南功能视力评分比传统的视力或视野范围测量更能预测以视力为目标的生活质量
目的:本研究的目的是确定1999年《视力障碍评估指南》中提出并被纳入《美国医学会永久性损伤评估指南》(指南)的方法中,结合视力(VA)和视野(VF)测量是否比单独使用VA或VF的标准视力测量更能预测自我报告的视力目标生活质量。设计:对200名视障人士的视觉功能和生活质量(QOL)进行评估。测试包括视力、视野和使用国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ)的视觉特异性生活质量。以通常的方式对视力和视野进行评分,然后使用指南中提出的方法重新进行评分,以得出功能性视力的测量。采用相关分析和逐步回归分析确定视觉功能、功能视觉与生活质量结果变量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ethics of Images Thinking of Images as Data Multimedia Cameras in Social Science Research Exploring Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1