Goldilocks and the three training models: A comparison of three models of low vision reading training on reading efficiency

G. Goodrich, J. Kirby, Teri Oros, Patricia Wagstaff, Berenice McDevitt, Julie Hazan, Laura Peters
{"title":"Goldilocks and the three training models: A comparison of three models of low vision reading training on reading efficiency","authors":"G. Goodrich, J. Kirby, Teri Oros, Patricia Wagstaff, Berenice McDevitt, Julie Hazan, Laura Peters","doi":"10.1080/13882350490903690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to determine if there were performance differences for subjects with age-related maculopathy (ARM) reading with optical devices or closed circuit televisions (CCTVs) based upon amount of training. Performance was measured as reading speed and duration. METHODS In the first experiment ninety subjects participated in an experiment comparing two models of training: a traditional model (TM) consisting of 10 optical device training sessions and 15 CCTV training sessions was compared to a shorter training model termed the empirical model (EM) derived from a post hoc review of training records. The EM consisted of five optical device training sessions with five practice sessions and seven CCTV trainings sessions with eight practice sessions. In the second experiment the EM was compared to a training model used by many private agencies/clinics termed the private sector model (PS) that consisted of one optical device training session or two CCTV training sessions. RESULTS Reading speed...","PeriodicalId":88340,"journal":{"name":"Visual impairment research","volume":"6 1","pages":"135-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13882350490903690","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual impairment research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13882350490903690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine if there were performance differences for subjects with age-related maculopathy (ARM) reading with optical devices or closed circuit televisions (CCTVs) based upon amount of training. Performance was measured as reading speed and duration. METHODS In the first experiment ninety subjects participated in an experiment comparing two models of training: a traditional model (TM) consisting of 10 optical device training sessions and 15 CCTV training sessions was compared to a shorter training model termed the empirical model (EM) derived from a post hoc review of training records. The EM consisted of five optical device training sessions with five practice sessions and seven CCTV trainings sessions with eight practice sessions. In the second experiment the EM was compared to a training model used by many private agencies/clinics termed the private sector model (PS) that consisted of one optical device training session or two CCTV training sessions. RESULTS Reading speed...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金发女孩与三种训练模式:三种低视力阅读训练模式对阅读效率的影响比较
该研究的目的是确定年龄相关性黄斑病变(ARM)受试者使用光学设备或闭路电视(cctv)阅读是否存在基于训练量的表现差异。表现是通过阅读速度和持续时间来衡量的。方法在第一个实验中,90名受试者参加了一个比较两种训练模型的实验:一种是由10个光学设备训练课程和15个CCTV训练课程组成的传统模型(TM),另一种是由训练记录事后回顾得出的更短的经验模型(EM)。EM包括五个光学器件培训课程,五个练习课程和七个CCTV培训课程,八个练习课程。在第二个实验中,EM与许多私人机构/诊所使用的一种培训模式进行了比较,这种模式被称为私人部门模式(PS),由一个光学设备培训课程或两个CCTV培训课程组成。阅读速度…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Ethics of Images Thinking of Images as Data Multimedia Cameras in Social Science Research Exploring Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1