{"title":"Propositions for Decolonising African Journalism and Media Research","authors":"S. Mudavanhu","doi":"10.1080/23743670.2021.1972533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015, student activists at the University of Cape added their voices to calls for decolonising “postcolonial” Africa that had been happening since the 1950s (Achebe 1958; wa Thiong’o 1986; Mbembe 2001; Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2013, 2015). Students challenged manifestations of White supremacy on the University of Cape Town campus specifically and at other universities more broadly. They demanded for an end to the violence and dehumanisation of Black people at the institution, a critical rethinking of curricula as well as the removal of hurdles in the tenure process for Black faculty among other issues (UCT: Rhodes Must Fall petition 2015). The commentary that follows adds to the above calls by proposing ways African journalism and media research can be decolonised. In most African countries, the media together with academic research were deeply implicated and complicit in the colonial project. They were used by colonial administrators to legitimise settler colonialism. In the media, Africa was depicted as backward, primitive and uncivilised, a “dark continent” desperately in need of civilising and developing (Zaghlami 2016). These representations of the continent were akin to images in Joseph Conrad’s novel, Heart of Darkness. Achebe (1977, 783) observes that Conrad framed Africa as “‘the other world,’ the antithesis of Europe [...] a place where man’s vaunted intelligence and refinement are finally mocked by triumphant beastiality”. In these narratives, Africans were dehumanised and pathologised, mostly portrayed as barbarians and the inferior Other. In his 1890 book, In Darkest Africa, journalist, author, explorer and colonial administrator Henry M. Stanley constantly referred to people he met in Africa as savages. Fanon (1963) explains that colonial discourses had very little regard for nuance or texture. Fanon (1963, 150) elaborates that “the ‘nigger’ was a savage, not an Angolan or a Nigerian, but a nigger”. Interestingly, the White, middle-class, able-bodied male was framed as superior, sophisticated, civilised and an embodiment of the norm. Some disciplines like psychology, anthropology and biology were notorious for propping up the milieu of ideas that framed Africans as “the least human of all” (Kessi 2016). Bulhan (2015, 249) explains:","PeriodicalId":54049,"journal":{"name":"African Journalism Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"126 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2021.1972533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In 2015, student activists at the University of Cape added their voices to calls for decolonising “postcolonial” Africa that had been happening since the 1950s (Achebe 1958; wa Thiong’o 1986; Mbembe 2001; Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2013, 2015). Students challenged manifestations of White supremacy on the University of Cape Town campus specifically and at other universities more broadly. They demanded for an end to the violence and dehumanisation of Black people at the institution, a critical rethinking of curricula as well as the removal of hurdles in the tenure process for Black faculty among other issues (UCT: Rhodes Must Fall petition 2015). The commentary that follows adds to the above calls by proposing ways African journalism and media research can be decolonised. In most African countries, the media together with academic research were deeply implicated and complicit in the colonial project. They were used by colonial administrators to legitimise settler colonialism. In the media, Africa was depicted as backward, primitive and uncivilised, a “dark continent” desperately in need of civilising and developing (Zaghlami 2016). These representations of the continent were akin to images in Joseph Conrad’s novel, Heart of Darkness. Achebe (1977, 783) observes that Conrad framed Africa as “‘the other world,’ the antithesis of Europe [...] a place where man’s vaunted intelligence and refinement are finally mocked by triumphant beastiality”. In these narratives, Africans were dehumanised and pathologised, mostly portrayed as barbarians and the inferior Other. In his 1890 book, In Darkest Africa, journalist, author, explorer and colonial administrator Henry M. Stanley constantly referred to people he met in Africa as savages. Fanon (1963) explains that colonial discourses had very little regard for nuance or texture. Fanon (1963, 150) elaborates that “the ‘nigger’ was a savage, not an Angolan or a Nigerian, but a nigger”. Interestingly, the White, middle-class, able-bodied male was framed as superior, sophisticated, civilised and an embodiment of the norm. Some disciplines like psychology, anthropology and biology were notorious for propping up the milieu of ideas that framed Africans as “the least human of all” (Kessi 2016). Bulhan (2015, 249) explains:
2015年,开普大学(University of Cape)的学生积极分子也加入了对“后殖民”非洲去殖民化的呼吁,这种呼声自20世纪50年代以来一直在发生(Achebe 1958;1986年;Mbembe 2001;Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2013, 2015)。学生们特别在开普敦大学校园和其他更广泛的大学挑战白人至上主义的表现。他们要求结束学校对黑人的暴力和非人化,对课程进行批判性的反思,以及消除黑人教师终身教职过程中的障碍等问题(UCT: Rhodes Must Fall 2015请愿书)。下面的评论通过提出非洲新闻和媒体研究可以去殖民化的方法,增加了上述呼吁。在大多数非洲国家,传播媒介和学术研究深深地牵连和串通在殖民项目中。它们被殖民统治者用来使定居者的殖民主义合法化。在媒体上,非洲被描述为落后、原始和不文明,是一个迫切需要开化和发展的“黑暗大陆”(Zaghlami 2016)。这些对大陆的描绘与约瑟夫·康拉德的小说《黑暗之心》中的形象相似。Achebe(1977,783)观察到康拉德将非洲描绘成“‘另一个世界’,是欧洲的对立面……在那里,人类自吹自擂的智慧和优雅最终被胜利的兽性所嘲弄”。在这些叙述中,非洲人被非人化和病态化,大多被描绘成野蛮人和劣等的他者。在1890年出版的《在最黑暗的非洲》一书中,记者、作家、探险家和殖民地管理者亨利·m·斯坦利不断地把他在非洲遇到的人称为野蛮人。法农(1963)解释说,殖民话语很少考虑细微差别或结构。法农(1963,150)阐述说“‘黑鬼’是野蛮人,不是安哥拉人或尼日利亚人,而是黑鬼”。有趣的是,白人、中产阶级、身体健全的男性被认为是优越、老练、文明的,是规范的体现。心理学、人类学和生物学等一些学科因支持将非洲人视为“最没有人性”的观点而臭名昭著(Kessi 2016)。Bulhan(2015, 249)解释说:
期刊介绍:
Accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training for university research purposes African Journalism Studies subscribes to the Code of Best Practice for Peer Reviewed Scholarly Journals of the Academy of Science of South Africa. African Journalism Studies ( AJS) aims to contribute to the ongoing extension of the theories, methodologies and empirical data to under-researched areas of knowledge production, through its emphasis on African journalism studies within a broader, comparative perspective of the Global South. AJS strives for theoretical diversity and methodological inclusivity, by developing theoretical approaches and making critical interventions in global scholarly debates. The journal''s comparative and interdisciplinary approach is informed by the related fields of cultural and media studies, communication studies, African studies, politics, and sociology. The field of journalism studies is understood broadly, as including the practices, norms, value systems, frameworks of representation, audiences, platforms, industries, theories and power relations that relate to the production, consumption and study of journalism. A wide definition of journalism is used, which extends beyond news and current affairs to include digital and social media, documentary film and narrative non-fiction.