Does ethno-territorial identity matter in populist party support? Evidence on the demand-side from 19 populist radical right and populist radical left national and regionalist parties

Q1 Social Sciences European Politics and Society Pub Date : 2021-09-23 DOI:10.1080/23745118.2021.1976577
R. Heinisch, Viktoria Jansesberger
{"title":"Does ethno-territorial identity matter in populist party support? Evidence on the demand-side from 19 populist radical right and populist radical left national and regionalist parties","authors":"R. Heinisch, Viktoria Jansesberger","doi":"10.1080/23745118.2021.1976577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates to what extent citizens’ conceptions of nation-state identity and European identity contribute to the support for populist radical parties along the left-right and the national level and sub-state divide. Drawing on data European Social Survey data, it employs multinomial and logistical regression models to examine the connection between territorial identity and support for majority nationalist Populist Radical Right Parties (PRRP) (9 cases), national-level Populist Radical Left Parties (PRLP) (4 cases), sub-national PRRP (3 cases), and sub-national PRLP (3 cases). The overall findings confirm that nation-state identity and European identity have independent and significant effects. In several of the cases, a strong nation-state identity is positively related to support for (a) majority nationalist PRRP. A (negative) European identity is a central characteristic throughout the sample of majority nationalist PRRP and present in every single case. Sub-state PRRP supporters reject nation-state identity and, interestingly, in one case also European identity more than do other partisans. Identity effects, especially a negative nation-state identity, were present among PRLP supporters too. However, the evidence points to significantly less coherence.","PeriodicalId":53479,"journal":{"name":"European Politics and Society","volume":"24 1","pages":"213 - 233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Politics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1976577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article investigates to what extent citizens’ conceptions of nation-state identity and European identity contribute to the support for populist radical parties along the left-right and the national level and sub-state divide. Drawing on data European Social Survey data, it employs multinomial and logistical regression models to examine the connection between territorial identity and support for majority nationalist Populist Radical Right Parties (PRRP) (9 cases), national-level Populist Radical Left Parties (PRLP) (4 cases), sub-national PRRP (3 cases), and sub-national PRLP (3 cases). The overall findings confirm that nation-state identity and European identity have independent and significant effects. In several of the cases, a strong nation-state identity is positively related to support for (a) majority nationalist PRRP. A (negative) European identity is a central characteristic throughout the sample of majority nationalist PRRP and present in every single case. Sub-state PRRP supporters reject nation-state identity and, interestingly, in one case also European identity more than do other partisans. Identity effects, especially a negative nation-state identity, were present among PRLP supporters too. However, the evidence points to significantly less coherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民族领土认同对民粹主义政党的支持有影响吗?来自19个民粹主义极右和民粹主义极左国家和地区主义政党的需求方面的证据
摘要本文探讨了公民的民族国家认同和欧洲认同观念在多大程度上促成了民粹主义激进政党在左翼和右翼、国家层面和次州层面的支持。本文利用欧洲社会调查数据,运用多项回归和逻辑回归模型,考察了地域认同与占多数的民粹主义极右政党(PRRP)(9例)、国家级民粹主义极左政党(PRLP)(4例)、次国家级民粹主义极右政党(PRRP)(3例)和次国家级民粹主义极右政党(PRLP)(3例)支持率之间的关系。整体调查结果证实,民族国家认同和欧洲认同具有独立且显著的影响。在一些情况下,强烈的民族国家认同与支持(a)多数民族主义PRRP呈正相关。(消极的)欧洲认同是多数民族主义PRRP样本的中心特征,在每一个案例中都存在。亚州PRRP的支持者反对民族国家认同,有趣的是,在一个案例中,他们比其他党派更反对欧洲认同。认同效应,尤其是消极的民族国家认同,也出现在人民民主工党的支持者中。然而,有证据表明,连贯性明显不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Politics and Society
European Politics and Society Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The editors of European Politics and Society welcome the submission of high quality articles on all aspects of European Politics, widely defined to include, comparative politics, political sociology, social policy, international relations, security, and modern history. The geographical scope of the journal covers all parts of Europe including the Russian Federation. The Journal also welcomes proposals for special thematic issues. For further guidelines on submission of special issue proposals, please see the Instructions for Authors page. All articles will be subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process by a minimum of two referees.
期刊最新文献
Discovering neighbors: the regional migration experience as a source of intergroup contact Why do business leaders, senior politicians and civil servants move to leading positions in EU civil society? Exploring capital gains through boundary crossing Challenged by postmaterialism: left-wing parties in postcommunist Europe Political realignment in Western Europe in the twenty-first century: eroding satisfaction and trust in democracy and its institutions? Individual sources of support for the EU and transnational cleavage beliefs: assessing the relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1