Transhistoricizing the Drone: A Comparative Visual Social Semiotic Analysis of Pigeon and Domestic Drone Photography

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 N/A ART Photography and Culture Pub Date : 2022-09-14 DOI:10.1080/17514517.2022.2116899
L. O’Hagan, Elisa Serafinelli
{"title":"Transhistoricizing the Drone: A Comparative Visual Social Semiotic Analysis of Pigeon and Domestic Drone Photography","authors":"L. O’Hagan, Elisa Serafinelli","doi":"10.1080/17514517.2022.2116899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article seeks to situate drone imagery within a more extensive lineage of practice by focusing on one particular form with which it is comparable: pigeon photography. Using a combination of visual social semiotic analysis, literature from Drone Studies, and archival research, it highlights four overarching characteristics shared between photographs taken by pigeons between 1908 and 1912 and contemporary drone visuals produced by hobbyists: verticality, geographical reimaginations, access to inaccessible places, and aerial self-portraits. In doing so, it aims to develop a better understanding of the social and material affordances/constraints of aerial photography, its meaning potentials and how they may have changed across space and time, and the social relations that are reflected in and shaped by its images. The article concludes by suggesting a nuanced perspective into the relationship between “new” and “old” media, arguing that images taken by drones and pigeons have similarities in their forms and functions, but their creation is guided by different ideological values and bounded by the potentials, norms, and traditions of the time. This perspective builds upon the recent turn in media studies toward transhistorical approaches to place seemingly novel contemporary communication technology within historical patterns of practice and use.","PeriodicalId":42826,"journal":{"name":"Photography and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photography and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17514517.2022.2116899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract This article seeks to situate drone imagery within a more extensive lineage of practice by focusing on one particular form with which it is comparable: pigeon photography. Using a combination of visual social semiotic analysis, literature from Drone Studies, and archival research, it highlights four overarching characteristics shared between photographs taken by pigeons between 1908 and 1912 and contemporary drone visuals produced by hobbyists: verticality, geographical reimaginations, access to inaccessible places, and aerial self-portraits. In doing so, it aims to develop a better understanding of the social and material affordances/constraints of aerial photography, its meaning potentials and how they may have changed across space and time, and the social relations that are reflected in and shaped by its images. The article concludes by suggesting a nuanced perspective into the relationship between “new” and “old” media, arguing that images taken by drones and pigeons have similarities in their forms and functions, but their creation is guided by different ideological values and bounded by the potentials, norms, and traditions of the time. This perspective builds upon the recent turn in media studies toward transhistorical approaches to place seemingly novel contemporary communication technology within historical patterns of practice and use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超历史化的无人机:鸽子与国内无人机摄影的视觉社会符号学比较分析
本文试图将无人机图像置于更广泛的实践谱系中,通过关注一种与之相似的特定形式:鸽子摄影。它结合了视觉社会符号学分析、无人机研究文献和档案研究,突出了1908年至1912年间鸽子拍摄的照片与业余爱好者制作的当代无人机图像之间共有的四个主要特征:垂直性、地理想象、进入难以到达的地方和空中自画像。在这样做的过程中,它旨在更好地理解航空摄影的社会和物质的支持/限制,它的意义潜力和它们如何在空间和时间上发生变化,以及它的图像所反映和塑造的社会关系。文章最后对“新”和“旧”媒体之间的关系提出了一个微妙的观点,认为无人机和鸽子拍摄的图像在形式和功能上有相似之处,但它们的创作受到不同的意识形态价值观的指导,并受到时代潜力、规范和传统的限制。这种观点建立在最近媒体研究转向超历史方法的基础上,将看似新颖的当代传播技术置于实践和使用的历史模式中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Nino Jorjadze: First Georgian Woman Photographer – Reporter of the First World War (1884–1968) From the Editors In Visible Presence: Soviet Afterlives in Family Photos From Military Facility to Cultural Heritage: The Goseong GP in Park Jongwoo’s DMZ Photography After the Korean War Loss and Found: Barthes, Hidden Biography and Ethical Deficit in Alexander Gardner’s ‘Portrait of Lewis Payne’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1