The Impact of Use of Dual Monitor Screens on 3D Head–Neck Posture and Activity of Neck Muscles

Abstract

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS Computers with dual monitor screens are being increasingly used at many workplaces. Altered screen layout and increased viewing space associated with dual monitor screens may affect head–neck working postures and the activity of neck muscles. However, this problem has not been investigated in the past, and standard guidelines based on empirical data are not available for setting up a computer workstation with dual monitor screens. The present study compared the effects of single versus dual monitor screens on 3D head–neck postures and the activity of neck muscles in computer users. The results of this study have demonstrated that working on a video display unit workstation with dual monitor screens involved more rotated, asymmetric head–neck postures and higher activation of the anterior neck muscles than a video display unit workstation with a single monitor screen. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Among workstation design factors, placement of the computer monitor screen is the most frequently identified risk factor for neck and shoulder pain among video display unit users. One of the recent changes in video display unit workstation design that may influence the position of computer monitor screens is the use of dual monitors. Some studies have shown that user performance and efficiency was positively affected by the use of dual monitor screens; however, the effect of use of dual monitor screens on the biomechanical behavior of the head-neck region is currently unknown. Purpose: This study was aimed at understanding the effect of single versus dual monitor screens on 3D head–neck postures and the activity of neck muscles. Method: Ten healthy participants performed three types of video display unit tasks: (1) reading for 10 minutes, (2) typing for 5 minutes, and (3) performing search and find tasks for 10 minutes using single and dual monitor screens. An inertial motion-capture system was used to measure 3D head–neck postures. Activity of sternocleidomastoid and cervical trapezius muscles was recorded bilaterally using surface electromyography. Results: Use of dual monitor screens significantly increased head–neck rotation by 9.0° compared to the single monitor screen. The range of motion of head–neck rotation increased significantly by 8.4° using dual monitor screens compared to the single monitor screen. Corresponding to the increase in the head–neck rotation, a contralateral increase in the activity of the right sternocleidomastoid muscle was observed with the dual monitor screen layout. Activity of cervical trapezius muscle was not affected by the type of monitor layout. Conclusions: Increased activation of anterior neck muscles caused by asymmetrical, more rotated head–neck postures while operating a video display unit workstation with dual monitor screens may increase the risk of neck musculoskeletal disorders, especially with prolonged computer use.