Patient-reported outcomes in advanced breast cancer: inside the label and approval documents

Y. Hao, Meaghan Krohe, I. Mazar, N. Galipeau, C. Foley, D. Globe, D. Turner-Bowker, A. Shields
{"title":"Patient-reported outcomes in advanced breast cancer: inside the label and approval documents","authors":"Y. Hao, Meaghan Krohe, I. Mazar, N. Galipeau, C. Foley, D. Globe, D. Turner-Bowker, A. Shields","doi":"10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are used in clinical research and practice for the assessment of disease-related symptoms and impacts as well as treatment-related side effects, from the patient perspective. However, a systematic examination of the role of PROs in metastatic breast cancer treatment approvals is lacking. A review of FDA labels and historical drug approval documents for metastatic breast cancer treatments was conducted to determine how PROs had been used or pursued to support labeling claims. In the historical drug approval documents, PROs were often being implemented by sponsors, and regulatory reviewers noted several issues limiting their suitability to support label claims. The findings suggest there is much room for improvement in how sponsors develop, implement, and report PRO measurement strategies as part of drug approval.","PeriodicalId":91681,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","volume":"1 1","pages":"197 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1174068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are used in clinical research and practice for the assessment of disease-related symptoms and impacts as well as treatment-related side effects, from the patient perspective. However, a systematic examination of the role of PROs in metastatic breast cancer treatment approvals is lacking. A review of FDA labels and historical drug approval documents for metastatic breast cancer treatments was conducted to determine how PROs had been used or pursued to support labeling claims. In the historical drug approval documents, PROs were often being implemented by sponsors, and regulatory reviewers noted several issues limiting their suitability to support label claims. The findings suggest there is much room for improvement in how sponsors develop, implement, and report PRO measurement strategies as part of drug approval.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期乳腺癌患者报告的结果:在标签和批准文件中
患者报告结果(PRO)指标在临床研究和实践中用于从患者角度评估疾病相关症状和影响以及治疗相关副作用。然而,对PROs在转移性乳腺癌治疗批准中的作用缺乏系统的研究。对FDA标签和转移性乳腺癌治疗的历史药物批准文件进行了审查,以确定如何使用或追求PROs来支持标签声明。在历史上的药物批准文件中,PROs通常是由申办者实施的,监管审查员注意到一些问题,限制了它们支持标签声明的适用性。研究结果表明,作为药物批准的一部分,在赞助商如何制定、实施和报告PRO测量策略方面还有很大的改进空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in people with cancer The supportive roles of spirituality and mindfulness in patients’ cancer journeys Physical activity and nutritional interventions and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: a review Fertility decision-making in cancer patients – current status and future directions Predicting survival of patients treated with palliative radiotherapy: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1