How should quality of life assessment be integrated in the evaluation of patients with acute myeloid leukemia?

T. Tvedt, H. Reikvam, Elise Aasebø, M. Hernandez-Valladares, F. Berven, F. Selheim, Ø. Bruserud
{"title":"How should quality of life assessment be integrated in the evaluation of patients with acute myeloid leukemia?","authors":"T. Tvedt, H. Reikvam, Elise Aasebø, M. Hernandez-Valladares, F. Berven, F. Selheim, Ø. Bruserud","doi":"10.1080/23809000.2016.1236659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Recent studies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) suggest that self-reported health status (including quality of life) should be a part of the pretherapy evaluation especially of elderly and unfit patients. However, there is also a need for additional studies to clarify the long-term effects of various antileukemic therapies. Areas covered: We searched for original articles in the PubMed database by the following combinations of terms: (i) acute myeloid leukemia combined with quality of life, geriatric assessment, or quality of life + allogeneic stem cell transplantation; or (ii) acute myeloid leukemia combined with either elderly, unfit, low-dose cytarabine or azacitidine. Expert commentary: We review and discuss the results from studies of quality of life for AML patients treated with conventional chemotherapy, autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Self-reported health status (including quality of life) should be a part of the pretherapy evaluation especially of elderly and unfit AML patients together with performance status, comorbidity scoring and geriatric assessment. The risk of chemoresistance to intensive treatment should also be included. All these aspects should be considered when evaluation the risk for treatment-related mortality and deciding the intensity of the antileukemic therapy.","PeriodicalId":91681,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","volume":"1 1","pages":"373 - 387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23809000.2016.1236659","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of quality of life in cancer care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23809000.2016.1236659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Recent studies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) suggest that self-reported health status (including quality of life) should be a part of the pretherapy evaluation especially of elderly and unfit patients. However, there is also a need for additional studies to clarify the long-term effects of various antileukemic therapies. Areas covered: We searched for original articles in the PubMed database by the following combinations of terms: (i) acute myeloid leukemia combined with quality of life, geriatric assessment, or quality of life + allogeneic stem cell transplantation; or (ii) acute myeloid leukemia combined with either elderly, unfit, low-dose cytarabine or azacitidine. Expert commentary: We review and discuss the results from studies of quality of life for AML patients treated with conventional chemotherapy, autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Self-reported health status (including quality of life) should be a part of the pretherapy evaluation especially of elderly and unfit AML patients together with performance status, comorbidity scoring and geriatric assessment. The risk of chemoresistance to intensive treatment should also be included. All these aspects should be considered when evaluation the risk for treatment-related mortality and deciding the intensity of the antileukemic therapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何将生活质量评价纳入急性髓系白血病患者的评价?
摘要:近年来对急性髓性白血病(AML)的研究表明,自我报告的健康状况(包括生活质量)应作为治疗前评估的一部分,尤其是老年和不适合治疗的患者。然而,还需要进一步的研究来阐明各种抗白血病疗法的长期效果。涵盖领域:我们在PubMed数据库中通过以下术语组合搜索原始文章:(i)急性髓系白血病合并生活质量、老年评估或生活质量+同种异体干细胞移植;或(ii)急性髓系白血病合并老年、不健康、低剂量阿糖胞苷或阿扎胞苷。专家评论:我们回顾并讨论了AML患者接受常规化疗、自体和异体干细胞移植以及急性早幼粒细胞白血病患者生活质量的研究结果。自我报告的健康状况(包括生活质量)应成为治疗前评估的一部分,特别是老年和不适合AML患者,以及表现状况、合并症评分和老年评估。强化治疗的耐药风险也应包括在内。在评估治疗相关死亡率的风险和决定抗白血病治疗的强度时,应考虑所有这些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in people with cancer The supportive roles of spirituality and mindfulness in patients’ cancer journeys Physical activity and nutritional interventions and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: a review Fertility decision-making in cancer patients – current status and future directions Predicting survival of patients treated with palliative radiotherapy: a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1