Effects of Rotation Frequency and Starting Task on Localized Muscle Fatigue and Performance During Simulated Assembly Work

Leanna M. Horton, M. Nussbaum, M. Agnew
{"title":"Effects of Rotation Frequency and Starting Task on Localized Muscle Fatigue and Performance During Simulated Assembly Work","authors":"Leanna M. Horton, M. Nussbaum, M. Agnew","doi":"10.1080/21577323.2013.822034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS This study simulated rotating between assembly tasks at two different intensity levels performed for a total duration of 1 hour, during which rotation occurred every 15 minutes, every 30 minutes, or not at all. Under the scenario studied here, rotation reduced shoulder muscle fatigue compared to only performing a higher intensity task and increased fatigue compared to only performing a lower intensity task. Neither rotation frequency nor starting task significantly affected fatigue or performance. Based on the results, rotation frequency and starting task may not need substantial consideration when designing rotation schedules or plans. Generalizing the current results to actual occupational tasks, however, may be limited due to the inclusion of only two tasks, the constrained nature of the task, and the small sample size. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Rotating between tasks is widely used and considered to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, though there is limited evidence that it is effective in doing so. Purpose: This study assessed the effects of rotation during assembly work involving the upper extremity, specifically focusing on rotation frequency and starting task, on shoulder muscle fatigue and task performance when included tasks loaded the same muscle group. Methods: Twelve participants completed six experimental sessions during which a simulated repetitive assembly task was performed for 1 hour either with or without rotation. When rotation occurred, it was between two intensity levels corresponding to two working heights. Results: As expected, rotating between the tasks reduced shoulder muscle fatigue compared to only performing the higher intensity task and increased fatigue compared to only performing the lower intensity task. Neither rotation frequency nor starting task had significant or consistent effects on fatigue or task performance. Conclusions: While varying the intensity level of tasks included in rotation schedules reduced muscle fatigue, this effect was not influenced substantially by either rotation frequency or starting task during the moderately demanding upper extremity assembly task examined here.","PeriodicalId":73331,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"53 1","pages":"176 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21577323.2013.822034","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2013.822034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS This study simulated rotating between assembly tasks at two different intensity levels performed for a total duration of 1 hour, during which rotation occurred every 15 minutes, every 30 minutes, or not at all. Under the scenario studied here, rotation reduced shoulder muscle fatigue compared to only performing a higher intensity task and increased fatigue compared to only performing a lower intensity task. Neither rotation frequency nor starting task significantly affected fatigue or performance. Based on the results, rotation frequency and starting task may not need substantial consideration when designing rotation schedules or plans. Generalizing the current results to actual occupational tasks, however, may be limited due to the inclusion of only two tasks, the constrained nature of the task, and the small sample size. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Rotating between tasks is widely used and considered to reduce the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, though there is limited evidence that it is effective in doing so. Purpose: This study assessed the effects of rotation during assembly work involving the upper extremity, specifically focusing on rotation frequency and starting task, on shoulder muscle fatigue and task performance when included tasks loaded the same muscle group. Methods: Twelve participants completed six experimental sessions during which a simulated repetitive assembly task was performed for 1 hour either with or without rotation. When rotation occurred, it was between two intensity levels corresponding to two working heights. Results: As expected, rotating between the tasks reduced shoulder muscle fatigue compared to only performing the higher intensity task and increased fatigue compared to only performing the lower intensity task. Neither rotation frequency nor starting task had significant or consistent effects on fatigue or task performance. Conclusions: While varying the intensity level of tasks included in rotation schedules reduced muscle fatigue, this effect was not influenced substantially by either rotation frequency or starting task during the moderately demanding upper extremity assembly task examined here.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旋转频率和启动任务对模拟装配工作中局部肌肉疲劳和性能的影响
本研究模拟了在两种不同强度的装配任务之间进行轮岗,轮岗时间为1小时,轮岗期间每15分钟轮岗一次,每30分钟轮岗一次,或者根本不轮岗。在本文研究的情况下,与只执行高强度任务相比,旋转减轻了肩部肌肉疲劳,与只执行低强度任务相比,旋转增加了疲劳。旋转频率和开始任务都不会显著影响疲劳或表现。根据结果,在设计轮换时间表或计划时,轮换频率和开始任务可能不需要大量考虑。然而,将目前的结果推广到实际的职业任务,可能会受到限制,因为只包括两个任务,任务的约束性质,以及小样本量。技术摘要背景:在不同的任务之间轮换被广泛使用,并被认为可以降低与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病的风险,尽管有有限的证据表明它是有效的。目的:本研究评估了上肢装配工作中旋转的影响,特别关注旋转频率和开始任务,当包括同一肌肉群的任务时,对肩部肌肉疲劳和任务表现的影响。方法:12名参与者完成了6个实验阶段,在此期间进行了1小时的模拟重复性组装任务,有或没有旋转。当发生旋转时,在两个工作高度对应的两个强度等级之间。结果:正如预期的那样,与只执行高强度任务相比,在任务之间旋转减少了肩部肌肉疲劳,与只执行低强度任务相比,增加了疲劳。轮换频率和开始任务对疲劳或任务表现都没有显著或一致的影响。结论:虽然改变旋转计划中包括的任务强度水平可以减少肌肉疲劳,但在本文研究的中等要求的上肢组装任务中,这种效果并没有受到旋转频率或开始任务的实质性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
End-of-Volume Editorial Board Muscle Activity and Posture Differences in the Sit and Stand Phases of Sit-to-Stand Workstation Use: A Comparison of Computer Configurations Augmented Reality “Smart Glasses” in the Workplace: Industry Perspectives and Challenges for Worker Safety and Health Evaluation of Vibrotactile Warning Systems for Supporting Hazard Awareness and Safety of Distracted Pedestrians Selecting the Optimal Sheeting-Font Combination to Increase the Visibility of Roadway Guide Signs in the Presence of Glare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1