Development of a Side-Impact (Gy) Neck Injury Criterion for Use in Aircraft and Vehicle Safety Evaluation

J. Parr, Michael E. Miller, J. Colombi, C. M. Kabban, J. Pellettiere
{"title":"Development of a Side-Impact (Gy) Neck Injury Criterion for Use in Aircraft and Vehicle Safety Evaluation","authors":"J. Parr, Michael E. Miller, J. Colombi, C. M. Kabban, J. Pellettiere","doi":"10.1080/21577323.2015.1022283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS In this study, a lateral impact (Gy accelerative input), upper-neck, multi-axial, neck injury criterion is developed. This criterion could be used to evaluate the safety of U.S. Air Force ejection systems incorporating helmet-mounted displays or other applications where neck injury risk from side impact occurs (e.g., automotive and civilian fixed-wing or rotary-wing aircraft). Development of the criterion was motivated by military aviation, which increasingly incorporates head-supported mass and an expanded pilot population, including smaller pilots (to 47 kg), raising concerns for pilot safety during ejection. Neck injury criteria based on risk functions constructed with human subject and postmortem human subject data allow system designers to quantify the injury risk and design acceptably safe systems. A maximum allowable value for the criterion applicable to U.S. Air Force ejection aircraft is proposed to limit neck injury risk to a 5% probability of moderate injury. However, the underlying risk function allows practitioners to customize the criterion for their desired level of injury risk and injury classification. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Neck injury remains a concern in ejection seat–equipped military aircraft with the growing use of helmet-mounted displays (HMDs) worn for entire mission durations, as well as in the automotive and civilian aircraft domains. Existing U.S. Department of Defense criteria are overly complex and not clearly tied to injury risk and thus require improvement. Purpose: This study developed a lateral (Gy) impact, upper neck injury criterion for use in the design and test of U.S. Department of Defense escape systems and HMDs. Methods: A multi-axial lateral impact risk function, referred to as MANIC(Gy), was constructed using the survival analysis of a data set that combined human subject (N = 56) and postmortem human (N = 9) data. The human subject data were analyzed to assess criterion sensitivity to anthropometric factors. Additionally, a risk function was applied to quantify the risk associated with changes in HMD mass and acceleration input. Results: A lateral impact (Gy), upper neck injury criterion is proposed, which yields a 5% risk of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2 or greater injury at a criterion value of 0.48 (95% confidence intervals of 0.28 and 0.67, respectively). At an injury level of AIS 3 or greater, a risk function was generated that yields a 5% risk at a criterion value of 0.53 (95% confidence intervals of 0.24 and 0.82, respectively). Conclusions: This initial multi-axial risk function could be applied to quantify the risk of neck injury posed by lateral acceleration. Criterion values were correlated with body mass and related anthropometric factors, indicating that the critical values incorporated in this study may require improvement. This same criterion may be useful for analyzing side impact safety in other vehicle systems (e.g., automotive and civilian fixed wing or rotary wing aircraft).","PeriodicalId":73331,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"3 1","pages":"151 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21577323.2015.1022283","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2015.1022283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS In this study, a lateral impact (Gy accelerative input), upper-neck, multi-axial, neck injury criterion is developed. This criterion could be used to evaluate the safety of U.S. Air Force ejection systems incorporating helmet-mounted displays or other applications where neck injury risk from side impact occurs (e.g., automotive and civilian fixed-wing or rotary-wing aircraft). Development of the criterion was motivated by military aviation, which increasingly incorporates head-supported mass and an expanded pilot population, including smaller pilots (to 47 kg), raising concerns for pilot safety during ejection. Neck injury criteria based on risk functions constructed with human subject and postmortem human subject data allow system designers to quantify the injury risk and design acceptably safe systems. A maximum allowable value for the criterion applicable to U.S. Air Force ejection aircraft is proposed to limit neck injury risk to a 5% probability of moderate injury. However, the underlying risk function allows practitioners to customize the criterion for their desired level of injury risk and injury classification. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Neck injury remains a concern in ejection seat–equipped military aircraft with the growing use of helmet-mounted displays (HMDs) worn for entire mission durations, as well as in the automotive and civilian aircraft domains. Existing U.S. Department of Defense criteria are overly complex and not clearly tied to injury risk and thus require improvement. Purpose: This study developed a lateral (Gy) impact, upper neck injury criterion for use in the design and test of U.S. Department of Defense escape systems and HMDs. Methods: A multi-axial lateral impact risk function, referred to as MANIC(Gy), was constructed using the survival analysis of a data set that combined human subject (N = 56) and postmortem human (N = 9) data. The human subject data were analyzed to assess criterion sensitivity to anthropometric factors. Additionally, a risk function was applied to quantify the risk associated with changes in HMD mass and acceleration input. Results: A lateral impact (Gy), upper neck injury criterion is proposed, which yields a 5% risk of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2 or greater injury at a criterion value of 0.48 (95% confidence intervals of 0.28 and 0.67, respectively). At an injury level of AIS 3 or greater, a risk function was generated that yields a 5% risk at a criterion value of 0.53 (95% confidence intervals of 0.24 and 0.82, respectively). Conclusions: This initial multi-axial risk function could be applied to quantify the risk of neck injury posed by lateral acceleration. Criterion values were correlated with body mass and related anthropometric factors, indicating that the critical values incorporated in this study may require improvement. This same criterion may be useful for analyzing side impact safety in other vehicle systems (e.g., automotive and civilian fixed wing or rotary wing aircraft).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于飞机和车辆安全评价的侧面碰撞颈部损伤标准的制定
在本研究中,制定了横向碰撞(Gy加速输入),上颈部,多轴,颈部损伤标准。该标准可用于评估美国空军弹射系统的安全性,该弹射系统包含头盔显示器或其他可能发生侧撞造成颈部损伤的应用(例如,汽车和民用固定翼或旋翼飞机)。该标准的发展是由军事航空推动的,军事航空越来越多地采用头部支撑的质量和扩大的飞行员人数,包括较小的飞行员(至47公斤),引起了对飞行员弹射时安全的关注。基于人类受试者和死后人类受试者数据构建的风险函数的颈部损伤标准允许系统设计者量化损伤风险并设计可接受的安全系统。提出了适用于美国空军弹射飞机的标准的最大允许值,以将颈部损伤风险限制在5%的中度损伤概率。然而,潜在的风险功能允许从业人员定制他们期望的伤害风险和伤害分类水平的标准。技术摘要背景:随着在整个任务期间佩戴头盔显示器(hmd)的军用飞机越来越多地使用,以及在汽车和民用飞机领域,配备弹射座椅的军用飞机颈部损伤仍然是一个值得关注的问题。美国国防部现有的标准过于复杂,与受伤风险没有明确的联系,因此需要改进。目的:本研究为美国国防部逃生系统和hmd的设计和试验制定了一个横向(Gy)冲击、上颈部损伤标准。方法:利用人类受试者(N = 56)和死后人类(N = 9)数据的生存分析数据集,构建多轴侧向冲击风险函数,称为MANIC(Gy)。对受试者资料进行分析,以评估对人体测量因素的标准敏感性。此外,应用风险函数来量化与HMD质量和加速度输入变化相关的风险。结果:提出了侧碰撞(Gy),上颈部损伤标准,该标准产生5%的简略损伤量表(AIS) 2或更大损伤的风险,标准值为0.48(95%置信区间分别为0.28和0.67)。在AIS 3级或更高的损伤水平下,产生一个风险函数,在0.53的标准值下产生5%的风险(95%置信区间分别为0.24和0.82)。结论:该初始多轴风险函数可用于量化横向加速度引起的颈部损伤风险。标准值与体重和相关人体测量因素相关,表明本研究中纳入的临界值可能需要改进。同样的标准也可用于分析其他车辆系统(例如,汽车和民用固定翼或旋转翼飞机)的侧面碰撞安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
End-of-Volume Editorial Board Muscle Activity and Posture Differences in the Sit and Stand Phases of Sit-to-Stand Workstation Use: A Comparison of Computer Configurations Augmented Reality “Smart Glasses” in the Workplace: Industry Perspectives and Challenges for Worker Safety and Health Evaluation of Vibrotactile Warning Systems for Supporting Hazard Awareness and Safety of Distracted Pedestrians Selecting the Optimal Sheeting-Font Combination to Increase the Visibility of Roadway Guide Signs in the Presence of Glare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1