An Investigation of Leaning Behaviors During One-Handed Submaximal Exertions with Extended Reaches

K. Fewster, J. Potvin
{"title":"An Investigation of Leaning Behaviors During One-Handed Submaximal Exertions with Extended Reaches","authors":"K. Fewster, J. Potvin","doi":"10.1080/21577323.2015.1042096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS The purpose of this study was to investigate hand leaning forces and the preferred leaning postures when completing tasks with various task hand locations, force demands, and effort directions. Twenty female participants completed a variety of different exertions with a leaning surface available. The hand leaning force magnitude changed as task hand location, force direction, and force level changed. These forces were significantly higher during pulling tasks and increased with increasing task hand load. The leaning hand height was slightly higher when task locations were at shoulder height, compared to the umbilical height. The findings are important, as current ergonomic tools neglect to consider that different task characteristics may change how and when a worker leans with their hands. These findings are of particular use to industry, as ergonomists now have representative forces and heights, to help guide leaning estimates during proactive risk assessments. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Leaning occurs in many automotive manufacturing tasks and provides various benefits to the worker. Leaning may allow for a more effective posture for task completion or reduce loading on the spine. Ergonomic assessments of tasks with leaning can be problematic because there is not sufficient data to predict leaning hand forces or the location of the leaning hand. Therefore, this study was completed to investigate leaning hand forces to help ergonomists make better predictions of how a leaning hand might be used during various industrial tasks. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate hand leaning characteristics and the preferred leaning postures when completing tasks with constrained reaches. Methods: Twenty female participants completed exertions with 24 combinations of load (27.5 and 55 N), force direction (push, pull, and down), horizontal reach (95% and 120% of arm length), and vertical height (shoulder and umbilical height). A large leaning surface was available to use while completing the task. Results: The height of the leaning hand ranged between 106.6 and 116.3 cm across all conditions. The leaning hand force was affected by task hand location, force direction, and force demand. Leaning hand forces increased with increasing task hand load and ranged from 13.8 to 79.6 N of force. Task hand pulls had higher leaning hand forces compared to push and down exertion directions, regardless of task hand location or force demand. Conclusion: The findings of this study will be of particular use to industry as ergonomists now have representative leaning forces and heights to help guide leaning estimates during proactive risk assessments.","PeriodicalId":73331,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"3 1","pages":"188 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21577323.2015.1042096","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2015.1042096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS The purpose of this study was to investigate hand leaning forces and the preferred leaning postures when completing tasks with various task hand locations, force demands, and effort directions. Twenty female participants completed a variety of different exertions with a leaning surface available. The hand leaning force magnitude changed as task hand location, force direction, and force level changed. These forces were significantly higher during pulling tasks and increased with increasing task hand load. The leaning hand height was slightly higher when task locations were at shoulder height, compared to the umbilical height. The findings are important, as current ergonomic tools neglect to consider that different task characteristics may change how and when a worker leans with their hands. These findings are of particular use to industry, as ergonomists now have representative forces and heights, to help guide leaning estimates during proactive risk assessments. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Leaning occurs in many automotive manufacturing tasks and provides various benefits to the worker. Leaning may allow for a more effective posture for task completion or reduce loading on the spine. Ergonomic assessments of tasks with leaning can be problematic because there is not sufficient data to predict leaning hand forces or the location of the leaning hand. Therefore, this study was completed to investigate leaning hand forces to help ergonomists make better predictions of how a leaning hand might be used during various industrial tasks. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate hand leaning characteristics and the preferred leaning postures when completing tasks with constrained reaches. Methods: Twenty female participants completed exertions with 24 combinations of load (27.5 and 55 N), force direction (push, pull, and down), horizontal reach (95% and 120% of arm length), and vertical height (shoulder and umbilical height). A large leaning surface was available to use while completing the task. Results: The height of the leaning hand ranged between 106.6 and 116.3 cm across all conditions. The leaning hand force was affected by task hand location, force direction, and force demand. Leaning hand forces increased with increasing task hand load and ranged from 13.8 to 79.6 N of force. Task hand pulls had higher leaning hand forces compared to push and down exertion directions, regardless of task hand location or force demand. Conclusion: The findings of this study will be of particular use to industry as ergonomists now have representative leaning forces and heights to help guide leaning estimates during proactive risk assessments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单手次极大伸展动作学习行为的研究
本研究的目的是探讨在不同的任务手位置、力需求和努力方向下,完成任务时的手倾斜力和首选的倾斜姿势。20名女性参与者在一个倾斜的表面上完成了各种不同的练习。手倾斜力的大小随任务手位置、力方向和力水平的变化而变化。这些力在拉扯任务中明显更高,并随着任务手负荷的增加而增加。与脐带高度相比,当任务位置位于肩部高度时,倾斜的手高度略高。这些发现很重要,因为目前的人体工程学工具忽视了不同的任务特征可能会改变工人用手倾斜的方式和时间。这些发现对工业特别有用,因为人类工效学家现在有代表性的力量和高度,以帮助指导前瞻性风险评估中的倾斜估计。技术摘要背景:学习发生在许多汽车制造任务中,并为工人提供了各种好处。倾斜可以让你以更有效的姿势完成任务或减少脊柱的负荷。由于没有足够的数据来预测倾斜手的力量或倾斜手的位置,因此对倾斜任务的人体工程学评估可能会有问题。因此,这项研究的完成是为了调查倾斜的手的力量,以帮助人体工程学学家更好地预测在各种工业任务中如何使用倾斜的手。目的:本研究的目的是探讨手的学习特征和完成受限动作时的首选学习姿势。方法:20名女性参与者完成了24组负重(27.5和55n)、力方向(推、拉、下)、水平伸展(臂长95%和120%)和垂直高度(肩高和脐高)的动作。在完成任务时,可以使用一个大的倾斜表面。结果:在所有情况下,倾斜手的高度在106.6 ~ 116.3 cm之间。任务手的位置、力的方向和力的需求对倾斜手的力有影响。倾斜手力随任务手负荷的增加而增加,其范围为13.8 ~ 79.6 N。无论任务手的位置或力需求如何,与推和下用力方向相比,任务手拉具有更高的倾斜手力。结论:这项研究的结果将特别适用于工业,因为人体工程学专家现在有代表性的倾斜力和高度,以帮助指导在主动风险评估期间的倾斜度估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
End-of-Volume Editorial Board Muscle Activity and Posture Differences in the Sit and Stand Phases of Sit-to-Stand Workstation Use: A Comparison of Computer Configurations Augmented Reality “Smart Glasses” in the Workplace: Industry Perspectives and Challenges for Worker Safety and Health Evaluation of Vibrotactile Warning Systems for Supporting Hazard Awareness and Safety of Distracted Pedestrians Selecting the Optimal Sheeting-Font Combination to Increase the Visibility of Roadway Guide Signs in the Presence of Glare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1