Integrating Physical and Cognitive Ergonomics

Ranjana K. Mehta
{"title":"Integrating Physical and Cognitive Ergonomics","authors":"Ranjana K. Mehta","doi":"10.1080/21577323.2016.1207475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ranjana K. Mehta Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA The field of human factors and ergonomics (HF/E), since its inception, has been instrumental in developing methods, tools, and solutions when considering cognitive and physical systems independently. However, every human action is orchestrated by mind (and brain) and body interactions. To comprehensively understand how humans (from the neck up and down) interact with their environments, it is necessary to employ approaches that effectively identify, assess, and facilitate development of controls and remedial measures that address these mind-body interactions. The study of physical ergonomics is concerned with human anatomic, anthropometric, physiological, and biomechanical characteristics as they relate to physical work systems. The study of cognitive human factors is concerned with mental processes, such as perception, memory, reasoning, and motor response, as they affect interactions among humans and other elements of a system. Most work systems involve some level of mental or cognitive processing in addition to physical efforts, so that ideally physical and cognitive demands should be considered together when examining human behavior at work. High cognitive demands can influence physical capabilities, and physical demands can influence cognitive processing. So, while HF/E is a highly multidisciplinary field that considers humans relative to some aspect of their work environment, efforts are needed to integrate physical and cognitive subsystems during evaluation and (re)design when considering the human in the context of the work situation. The goal of this special issue is to contribute to the growing body of scientific literature on integrating physical and cognitive ergonomics that brings researchers closer as an interdisciplinary HF/E field. The breadth of topics covered includes studies that focus on quantifying human behavior when interacting with physical and cognitive subsystems, applied research that proposes predictive tools to assess multidimensional work demands, theoretical positions and new methodologies that challenge how we currently examine these interactions, and finally, evidence that highlights business outcomes of the interplay between physical and cognitive processes. Mental workload, fatigue, and stress, stemming from an overloaded cognitive subsystem, have been shown consistently to affect several aspects of human physical capabilities. For example, cognitive distractors and social stress can alter biomechanical strategies during controlled processes such as upper extremity and low back exertions ( Marras, Davis, Heaney, Maronitis, & Allread, 2000; Mehta & Agnew, 2011; Mehta, Nussbaum, & Agnew, 2012) as Corresponding author. E-mail: rmehta@tamu.edu","PeriodicalId":73331,"journal":{"name":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","volume":"4 1","pages":"83 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21577323.2016.1207475","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21577323.2016.1207475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Ranjana K. Mehta Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Texas A&M University, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA The field of human factors and ergonomics (HF/E), since its inception, has been instrumental in developing methods, tools, and solutions when considering cognitive and physical systems independently. However, every human action is orchestrated by mind (and brain) and body interactions. To comprehensively understand how humans (from the neck up and down) interact with their environments, it is necessary to employ approaches that effectively identify, assess, and facilitate development of controls and remedial measures that address these mind-body interactions. The study of physical ergonomics is concerned with human anatomic, anthropometric, physiological, and biomechanical characteristics as they relate to physical work systems. The study of cognitive human factors is concerned with mental processes, such as perception, memory, reasoning, and motor response, as they affect interactions among humans and other elements of a system. Most work systems involve some level of mental or cognitive processing in addition to physical efforts, so that ideally physical and cognitive demands should be considered together when examining human behavior at work. High cognitive demands can influence physical capabilities, and physical demands can influence cognitive processing. So, while HF/E is a highly multidisciplinary field that considers humans relative to some aspect of their work environment, efforts are needed to integrate physical and cognitive subsystems during evaluation and (re)design when considering the human in the context of the work situation. The goal of this special issue is to contribute to the growing body of scientific literature on integrating physical and cognitive ergonomics that brings researchers closer as an interdisciplinary HF/E field. The breadth of topics covered includes studies that focus on quantifying human behavior when interacting with physical and cognitive subsystems, applied research that proposes predictive tools to assess multidimensional work demands, theoretical positions and new methodologies that challenge how we currently examine these interactions, and finally, evidence that highlights business outcomes of the interplay between physical and cognitive processes. Mental workload, fatigue, and stress, stemming from an overloaded cognitive subsystem, have been shown consistently to affect several aspects of human physical capabilities. For example, cognitive distractors and social stress can alter biomechanical strategies during controlled processes such as upper extremity and low back exertions ( Marras, Davis, Heaney, Maronitis, & Allread, 2000; Mehta & Agnew, 2011; Mehta, Nussbaum, & Agnew, 2012) as Corresponding author. E-mail: rmehta@tamu.edu
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合物理和认知人机工程学
Ranjana K. Mehta, Texas A&M University环境与职业健康系,1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA人因与人体工程学(HF/E)领域自成立以来,在独立考虑认知和身体系统时,一直在开发方法,工具和解决方案方面发挥着重要作用。然而,人类的每一个行为都是由思想(和大脑)和身体的相互作用精心策划的。为了全面了解人类(从颈部上下)如何与环境相互作用,有必要采用有效识别、评估和促进控制和补救措施发展的方法,以解决这些身心相互作用。人体工效学的研究涉及人体解剖学、人体测量学、生理学和生物力学特征,因为它们与身体工作系统有关。人类认知因素的研究涉及心理过程,如感知、记忆、推理和运动反应,因为它们影响人类和系统中其他元素之间的相互作用。除了体力劳动外,大多数工作系统还涉及某种程度的心理或认知处理,因此,在检查人类工作行为时,理想情况下应该同时考虑身体和认知需求。高认知需求可以影响身体能力,而身体需求可以影响认知加工。因此,虽然HF/E是一个高度多学科的领域,它考虑了人类与工作环境的某些方面,但在评估和(重新)设计过程中,当考虑到工作环境中的人类时,需要努力整合物理和认知子系统。这期特刊的目标是为整合身体和认知人体工程学的科学文献做出贡献,使研究人员更接近跨学科的HF/E领域。所涵盖的主题范围包括专注于量化人类与物理和认知子系统相互作用时的行为的研究,提出预测工具以评估多维工作需求的应用研究,挑战我们目前如何检查这些相互作用的理论立场和新方法,最后,强调物理和认知过程之间相互作用的业务结果的证据。精神负荷、疲劳和压力,源于超负荷的认知子系统,已经被证明会持续影响人类身体能力的几个方面。例如,认知干扰物和社会压力可以改变上肢和腰背部活动等控制过程中的生物力学策略(Marras, Davis, Heaney, Maronitis, & Allread, 2000;Mehta & Agnew, 2011;Mehta, Nussbaum, & Agnew, 2012)作为通讯作者。电子邮件:rmehta@tamu.edu
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
End-of-Volume Editorial Board Muscle Activity and Posture Differences in the Sit and Stand Phases of Sit-to-Stand Workstation Use: A Comparison of Computer Configurations Augmented Reality “Smart Glasses” in the Workplace: Industry Perspectives and Challenges for Worker Safety and Health Evaluation of Vibrotactile Warning Systems for Supporting Hazard Awareness and Safety of Distracted Pedestrians Selecting the Optimal Sheeting-Font Combination to Increase the Visibility of Roadway Guide Signs in the Presence of Glare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1