“It’s a dent, not a break”: an exploration of how care co-ordinators understand and navigate boundaries in early intervention in psychosis services

Alexandra Bone, Rachel Terry, Rebecca Whitfield
{"title":"“It’s a dent, not a break”: an exploration of how care co-ordinators understand and navigate boundaries in early intervention in psychosis services","authors":"Alexandra Bone, Rachel Terry, Rebecca Whitfield","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2022.2108489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Early Intervention in Psychosis Services (EIP) offer a unique service model for people experiencing a first episode of psychosis. They are intensive case-management services which adopt an assertive outreach approach, employing flexible boundaries to meet clients in the community, and support them towards recovery and holistic goals. Current boundary theory is therefore not easily applied to this clinical context. This study aimed to explore how care-co-ordinators in EIP develop their understanding and practise around navigating boundaries. Methods Participants were 13 EIP care co-ordinators. Semi-structured interviews with participants were conducted and analysed using grounded theory. Results A concentric model emerged, defining different layers of influence impacting care co-ordinators’ navigation of boundaries. This included higher governing levels (e.g. professional codes of conduct), factors and challenges specific to EIP culture, client characteristics and individual care co-ordinator decision-making processes. A flexible, case-by-case approach was adopted in response to challenges. Discussion Findings suggest clinical implications for how care co-ordinators can jointly construct appropriate boundaries with clients and families, and discuss dilemmas using the team resource. This model can be used as a tool in clinical practice to aid clinicians’ thinking and reflection around boundaries within EIP.","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2022.2108489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Early Intervention in Psychosis Services (EIP) offer a unique service model for people experiencing a first episode of psychosis. They are intensive case-management services which adopt an assertive outreach approach, employing flexible boundaries to meet clients in the community, and support them towards recovery and holistic goals. Current boundary theory is therefore not easily applied to this clinical context. This study aimed to explore how care-co-ordinators in EIP develop their understanding and practise around navigating boundaries. Methods Participants were 13 EIP care co-ordinators. Semi-structured interviews with participants were conducted and analysed using grounded theory. Results A concentric model emerged, defining different layers of influence impacting care co-ordinators’ navigation of boundaries. This included higher governing levels (e.g. professional codes of conduct), factors and challenges specific to EIP culture, client characteristics and individual care co-ordinator decision-making processes. A flexible, case-by-case approach was adopted in response to challenges. Discussion Findings suggest clinical implications for how care co-ordinators can jointly construct appropriate boundaries with clients and families, and discuss dilemmas using the team resource. This model can be used as a tool in clinical practice to aid clinicians’ thinking and reflection around boundaries within EIP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这是一个凹痕,而不是一个突破”:探索护理协调员如何理解和驾驭精神病服务早期干预的界限
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
A mixed-methods validation of the 15-item English version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) in an adult mental health inpatient rehabilitation setting Exploring service users’ and practitioners’ priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis The association between social identity and paranoia through the mediators of trust and hostile attribution bias in a UK general population study Exploring personal accounts of the facilitators and barriers to seeking help for first-episode psychosis (FEP): a meta-ethnography A book review of Crash: a memoir of overmedication and recovery A book review of Crash: a memoir of overmedication and recovery , by Ann Bracken, Simpsonville, MD, Charing Cross Press, 2023, 227 pp., $18.00 (paperback), ISBN: 978057839433-6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1