“Woman, Life, Freedom”

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE International Feminist Journal of Politics Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/14616742.2022.2140271
Shine Choi, Natália Maria Félix de Souza, A. Lind, Swati Parashar, Elisabeth Prügl, M. Zalewski
{"title":"“Woman, Life, Freedom”","authors":"Shine Choi, Natália Maria Félix de Souza, A. Lind, Swati Parashar, Elisabeth Prügl, M. Zalewski","doi":"10.1080/14616742.2022.2140271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this editorial, we want to recognize and align ourselves with the courageous women and girls of Iran who, at the time of writing, are out on the streets shouting their rage against a repressive regime run by elderly clerics and religious patriarchs. These men have declared women’s lives to be worth half those of men. Indeed, this is a regime built on the systematic curtailment of women’s rights. Confronted by a ruthless security apparatus, some of the protesters are paying with their lives as they demand “Woman, Life, Freedom.” The death of Mahsa Amini – imprisoned and ultimately killed for a “bad hijab,” a wisp of hair escaping the legally mandated headscarf – has rallied them. Women’s hair has become their symbol – shaved off in mourning, cut in protest and solidarity, but also set free and displayed proudly in public as it prefigures a new freedom. We should not forget that Iranian women have resisted this regime in various ways from its inception more than 40 years ago, as documented in various articles in this and other feminist and decolonial journals (Erfani 2020; Hassani 2017; Hoominfar and Zanganeh 2021; Sameh 2010). Furthermore, while their struggle is no doubt unique in many ways, it resonates eerily as we observe right-wing, populist, and fundamentalist movements entering governments around the world, doing their grotesque best to assert control over particular sexed, racialized, and gendered bodies, rolling back the gains that feminists have made through decades of struggle, denigrating migrants and others at the bottom of colonialist hierarchies, and fostering violence and hate. These agendas have propelled gender politics into the center of global power politics (or made this centrality more visible), where stifling moralism fuels our anger and increasingly our resistance. The relationship between feminisms and “the state” has long been fraught, but today we see unusual levels of complexity and contradiction. On the one hand, feminists continue to lobby governments to change policies and laws, to better “govern” sex/gender in its multiple intersections – from demanding control over our own bodies to claiming a seat at the tables of power. Indeed, feminisms of a particular kind have entered a range of governance arenas, including not only state bureaucracies and the United Nations but also universities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and even private corporations, where initiatives for diversity, equity, and inclusion proliferate. On the other hand, feminist values are under attack in Iran and beyond, in a","PeriodicalId":54203,"journal":{"name":"International Feminist Journal of Politics","volume":"24 1","pages":"671 - 674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Feminist Journal of Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2022.2140271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this editorial, we want to recognize and align ourselves with the courageous women and girls of Iran who, at the time of writing, are out on the streets shouting their rage against a repressive regime run by elderly clerics and religious patriarchs. These men have declared women’s lives to be worth half those of men. Indeed, this is a regime built on the systematic curtailment of women’s rights. Confronted by a ruthless security apparatus, some of the protesters are paying with their lives as they demand “Woman, Life, Freedom.” The death of Mahsa Amini – imprisoned and ultimately killed for a “bad hijab,” a wisp of hair escaping the legally mandated headscarf – has rallied them. Women’s hair has become their symbol – shaved off in mourning, cut in protest and solidarity, but also set free and displayed proudly in public as it prefigures a new freedom. We should not forget that Iranian women have resisted this regime in various ways from its inception more than 40 years ago, as documented in various articles in this and other feminist and decolonial journals (Erfani 2020; Hassani 2017; Hoominfar and Zanganeh 2021; Sameh 2010). Furthermore, while their struggle is no doubt unique in many ways, it resonates eerily as we observe right-wing, populist, and fundamentalist movements entering governments around the world, doing their grotesque best to assert control over particular sexed, racialized, and gendered bodies, rolling back the gains that feminists have made through decades of struggle, denigrating migrants and others at the bottom of colonialist hierarchies, and fostering violence and hate. These agendas have propelled gender politics into the center of global power politics (or made this centrality more visible), where stifling moralism fuels our anger and increasingly our resistance. The relationship between feminisms and “the state” has long been fraught, but today we see unusual levels of complexity and contradiction. On the one hand, feminists continue to lobby governments to change policies and laws, to better “govern” sex/gender in its multiple intersections – from demanding control over our own bodies to claiming a seat at the tables of power. Indeed, feminisms of a particular kind have entered a range of governance arenas, including not only state bureaucracies and the United Nations but also universities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and even private corporations, where initiatives for diversity, equity, and inclusion proliferate. On the other hand, feminist values are under attack in Iran and beyond, in a
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“女人,生命,自由”
在这篇社论中,我们希望认识到伊朗勇敢的妇女和女孩,并与她们站在一起,在撰写本文时,她们走上街头,对由老年神职人员和宗教族长统治的镇压政权大声疾呼,表达她们的愤怒。这些人宣称女人的生命价值只有男人的一半。事实上,这是一个建立在系统性剥夺妇女权利基础上的政权。面对冷酷无情的安全机构,一些抗议者正在付出生命的代价,因为他们要求“女人,生命,自由”。马赫萨·阿米尼(Mahsa Amini)因“糟糕的头巾”(一缕从法律规定的头巾中逃脱的头发)而被监禁并最终被杀,他的死让他们团结起来。女性的头发已经成为她们的象征——在哀悼中被剃掉,在抗议和团结中被剪掉,但也被释放出来,自豪地在公共场合展示,因为这预示着一种新的自由。我们不应忘记,自40多年前这个政权成立以来,伊朗妇女一直以各种方式抵制这个政权,正如本杂志和其他女权主义和非殖民化期刊的各种文章所记载的那样(Erfani 2020;Hassani 2017;Hoominfar和Zanganeh 2021;Sameh 2010)。此外,虽然他们的斗争在许多方面无疑是独一无二的,但当我们观察到右翼、民粹主义和原教旨主义运动进入世界各地的政府时,它会产生奇怪的共鸣,他们尽其所能地控制特定的性别、种族和性别群体,推翻女权主义者通过几十年的斗争取得的成果,诋毁移民和其他处于殖民主义等级制度底层的人,并滋生暴力和仇恨。这些议程将性别政治推向了全球权力政治的中心(或者使这种中心地位更加明显),在那里,令人窒息的道德主义点燃了我们的愤怒,并越来越多地引发了我们的反抗。长期以来,女权主义和“国家”之间的关系一直令人担忧,但今天我们看到了不同寻常的复杂性和矛盾。一方面,女权主义者继续游说政府改变政策和法律,以更好地“管理”性别/性别的多重交叉点——从要求控制我们自己的身体到在权力的桌子上占有一席之地。事实上,一种特殊类型的女权主义已经进入了一系列治理领域,不仅包括国家官僚机构和联合国,还包括大学、非政府组织(ngo),甚至私营公司,在这些领域,多样性、平等和包容的倡议正在激增。另一方面,女权主义价值观在伊朗和其他地方受到攻击
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: International Feminist Journal of Politics is a unique cross-cultural and international forum to foster debate and dialogue at the intersection of international relations, politics and womens" studies. Developed by a team of leading feminist scholars, this journal brings together some of the most influential figures in the field to build a global critical community of writers and readers.
期刊最新文献
Displaced lives: rethinking survival, social reproduction, and (in)security with refugees. The harm of normalized violence: re-identifying intimate partner violence as torture in acknowledging the stakes of abusive relationships Revisiting Women’s Cinema: Feminism, Socialism, and Mainstream Culture in Modern China Revisiting Women’s Cinema: Feminism, Socialism, and Mainstream Culture in Modern China , by Lingzhen Wang, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2021, 312 pp., $28.95(paperback), ISBN 978-1-478-01080-7 Changing the Subject: Feminist and Queer Politics in Neoliberal India Changing the Subject: Feminist and Queer Politics in Neoliberal India , by Srila Roy, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2022, 280 pp., $26.95 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-4780-1888-9 Heading Home: Motherhood, Work and the Failed Promise of Equality Heading Home: Motherhood, Work and the Failed Promise of Equality , by Shani Orgad, New York, Columbia University Press, 2019, 304 pp., $31.99 (ebook), ISBN 978-0-2315-4563-1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1