Shapeshifters: Black girls and the choreography of citizenship

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Children and Poverty Pub Date : 2016-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10796126.2015.1134451
Melissa Crum
{"title":"Shapeshifters: Black girls and the choreography of citizenship","authors":"Melissa Crum","doi":"10.1080/10796126.2015.1134451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worker Community Building Initiative, which managed $50 million in philanthropic giving. These initiatives purportedly identified ways in which growers and workers could collaborate in a ‘win-win’ model for improving working conditions as well as economic prosperity. But as the author argues, this model failed to address the more basic conditions and causes of poverty and inequality for farmworkers. One interesting insight that emerges from these case studies is that grass roots organizers and nonprofit organizational staff are sometimes forced to negotiate, interpret, defy, or subvert the conservative agendas of funding organizations in order to advance activist initiatives that challenge the dominant power structures. As the book reveals, a central dilemma or contradiction of self-help philanthropy is that activism on behalf of farmworkers and immigrant labor actually threatens the social and economic infrastructures of organizations that fund such nonprofits, since nonprofits will most often be supported by surplus capital that is the result of wealth acquired at the expense of low-wage workers. One might wonder whether or not this contradiction is a permanent and intractable problem at the heart of nonprofit funding organizations. Kohl-Arenas concludes her study by saying that we are caught between two views of poverty: the self-help narrative that urges poor people to help themselves by changing their behaviors, negotiating conflict, and working within systems of power; and a narrative about the self-determination and dignity of poor people’s movements that demands ‘ ... respect, in treatment, in pay, [and] in rights and opportunities... ’ (189). My only criticism of this well written and fascinating organizational study is that the author, in her final analysis, seems to retreat from the normative conclusion(s) for which she has so painstakingly made a case throughout most of the book. The self-help narrative is a ‘myth’ after all. The descriptions of how professional managers of nonprofit organizations struggle with this narrative are poignant and revealing. But readers might also want more practical guidance about how best to challenge the prevailing assumption that a solution to poverty involves ‘asking the poor to help themselves’.","PeriodicalId":35244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children and Poverty","volume":"22 1","pages":"69 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10796126.2015.1134451","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children and Poverty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10796126.2015.1134451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Worker Community Building Initiative, which managed $50 million in philanthropic giving. These initiatives purportedly identified ways in which growers and workers could collaborate in a ‘win-win’ model for improving working conditions as well as economic prosperity. But as the author argues, this model failed to address the more basic conditions and causes of poverty and inequality for farmworkers. One interesting insight that emerges from these case studies is that grass roots organizers and nonprofit organizational staff are sometimes forced to negotiate, interpret, defy, or subvert the conservative agendas of funding organizations in order to advance activist initiatives that challenge the dominant power structures. As the book reveals, a central dilemma or contradiction of self-help philanthropy is that activism on behalf of farmworkers and immigrant labor actually threatens the social and economic infrastructures of organizations that fund such nonprofits, since nonprofits will most often be supported by surplus capital that is the result of wealth acquired at the expense of low-wage workers. One might wonder whether or not this contradiction is a permanent and intractable problem at the heart of nonprofit funding organizations. Kohl-Arenas concludes her study by saying that we are caught between two views of poverty: the self-help narrative that urges poor people to help themselves by changing their behaviors, negotiating conflict, and working within systems of power; and a narrative about the self-determination and dignity of poor people’s movements that demands ‘ ... respect, in treatment, in pay, [and] in rights and opportunities... ’ (189). My only criticism of this well written and fascinating organizational study is that the author, in her final analysis, seems to retreat from the normative conclusion(s) for which she has so painstakingly made a case throughout most of the book. The self-help narrative is a ‘myth’ after all. The descriptions of how professional managers of nonprofit organizations struggle with this narrative are poignant and revealing. But readers might also want more practical guidance about how best to challenge the prevailing assumption that a solution to poverty involves ‘asking the poor to help themselves’.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变形人:黑人女孩和公民的舞蹈
工人社区建设倡议,管理着5000万美元的慈善捐赠。据称,这些举措确定了种植者和工人在改善工作条件和经济繁荣的“双赢”模式下合作的方式。但正如作者所言,这种模式未能解决农场工人贫困和不平等的更基本的条件和原因。从这些案例研究中得出的一个有趣的结论是,草根组织者和非营利组织的工作人员有时被迫谈判、解释、反抗或颠覆资助组织的保守议程,以推进挑战主导权力结构的激进倡议。正如这本书所揭示的那样,自助慈善事业的一个核心困境或矛盾是,代表农场工人和移民劳工的行动主义实际上威胁到资助此类非营利组织的组织的社会和经济基础设施,因为非营利组织通常会得到剩余资本的支持,而这些剩余资本是通过牺牲低工资工人的财富来获得的。人们可能会想,这种矛盾是否是非营利资助机构的一个长期而棘手的核心问题。科尔-阿雷纳斯在总结她的研究时说,我们被夹在两种关于贫困的观点之间:一种是自助叙事,它敦促穷人通过改变自己的行为、协商冲突和在权力体系内工作来帮助自己;关于穷人运动的自决和尊严的叙述要求“……尊重、待遇、报酬、权利和机会……”(189)。我对这本写得很好的、引人入胜的组织研究的唯一批评是,作者在她的最终分析中,似乎放弃了规范性的结论,而她在书的大部分时间里都煞费苦心地为之辩护。自助故事毕竟是一个“神话”。书中对非营利组织职业经理人如何与这种叙事作斗争的描述既尖锐又发人深省。但是读者可能也想要更多实用的指导,关于如何最好地挑战一种流行的假设,即解决贫困的办法包括“要求穷人自助”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Children and Poverty
Journal of Children and Poverty Social Sciences-Demography
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk-taking behaviors of homeless youth: moderation by parental monitoring and social support Reimagining homelessness assistance for children and families Letter from the editor Using Youth Risk Behavior Survey data to analyze housing instability among Delaware public school students Assessment and screening of positive childhood experiences along with childhood adversity in research, practice, and policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1