Crime Trends and the Elasticity of Evil: Has a Broadening View of Violence Affected Our Statistical Indicators?

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Crime and Justice-A Review of Research Pub Date : 2015-07-28 DOI:10.1086/681555
J. Lynch, Lynn A. Addington
{"title":"Crime Trends and the Elasticity of Evil: Has a Broadening View of Violence Affected Our Statistical Indicators?","authors":"J. Lynch, Lynn A. Addington","doi":"10.1086/681555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Macro-social theories posit that societies become more civil as they modernize. An open question is whether these changes affect major social indicators of crime. To produce level and change estimates, national data collection systems employ safeguards to promote stability. Cultural changes, though, might affect these systems in more subtle ways by affecting what citizens view as criminal violence and how these behaviors are recounted in crime surveys and reported to police. Three subclasses of violence appear most susceptible: rape and sexual assault, domestic violence, and lesser forms of violence such as verbal threats. Findings are strongest that changing cultural definitions have affected official statistics for domestic violence. Rape and sexual assault also have shown changes in the willingness of victims to report to the police. Evidence does not indicate that the cultural definition of lesser violence has changed in a way that has affected trends in official statistics. Estimating change over time is a key reason statistical systems employ safeguards to remove shifting views of violence. These safeguards may limit an accurate view of victimization risk and exposure. Balancing the need for stability with a desire to capture emerging crimes and risks requires developing careful systematic processes for reviewing and updating national crime statistics.","PeriodicalId":51456,"journal":{"name":"Crime and Justice-A Review of Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"297 - 331"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/681555","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crime and Justice-A Review of Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/681555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Macro-social theories posit that societies become more civil as they modernize. An open question is whether these changes affect major social indicators of crime. To produce level and change estimates, national data collection systems employ safeguards to promote stability. Cultural changes, though, might affect these systems in more subtle ways by affecting what citizens view as criminal violence and how these behaviors are recounted in crime surveys and reported to police. Three subclasses of violence appear most susceptible: rape and sexual assault, domestic violence, and lesser forms of violence such as verbal threats. Findings are strongest that changing cultural definitions have affected official statistics for domestic violence. Rape and sexual assault also have shown changes in the willingness of victims to report to the police. Evidence does not indicate that the cultural definition of lesser violence has changed in a way that has affected trends in official statistics. Estimating change over time is a key reason statistical systems employ safeguards to remove shifting views of violence. These safeguards may limit an accurate view of victimization risk and exposure. Balancing the need for stability with a desire to capture emerging crimes and risks requires developing careful systematic processes for reviewing and updating national crime statistics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犯罪趋势和邪恶的弹性:扩大暴力的观点影响了我们的统计指标吗?
宏观社会理论认为,随着社会的现代化,社会会变得更加文明。一个悬而未决的问题是,这些变化是否会影响犯罪的主要社会指标。为了估算水平和变化,国家数据收集系统采用保障措施促进稳定。然而,文化变化可能会以更微妙的方式影响这些系统,影响公民对犯罪暴力的看法,以及如何在犯罪调查中叙述这些行为并向警方报告。三种子类别的暴力似乎最容易受到影响:强奸和性侵犯、家庭暴力以及口头威胁等较轻形式的暴力。最有力的发现是,文化定义的变化影响了家庭暴力的官方统计数据。强奸和性侵犯也显示出受害者向警方报案意愿的变化。没有证据表明,较少暴力的文化定义发生了影响官方统计趋势的变化。估计随时间的变化是统计系统采用保障措施来消除暴力观点变化的关键原因。这些保障措施可能会限制对受害风险和暴露的准确看法。平衡稳定的需要与捕捉新出现的犯罪和风险的愿望,需要制定审查和更新国家犯罪统计数据的仔细系统程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Crime and Justice-A Review of Research
Crime and Justice-A Review of Research CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Crime and Justice: A Review of Research is a refereed series of volumes of commissioned essays on crime-related research subjects published by the University of Chicago Press. Since 1979 the Crime and Justice series has presented a review of the latest international research, providing expertise to enhance the work of sociologists, psychologists, criminal lawyers, justice scholars, and political scientists. The series explores a full range of issues concerning crime, its causes, and its cure.
期刊最新文献
The Criminalization of Dissent and Protest Why Americans Are a People of Exceptional Violence Victimization and Its Consequences over the Life Course (Re)Considering Personality in Criminological Research Against All Odds: The Unexplained Sexual Recidivism Drop in the United States and Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1