{"title":"Passing Fancies in Jewish American Literature and Culture","authors":"Debra Shostak","doi":"10.1080/14725886.2023.2252364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"by the emerging scholar, Jess Olson, in “Reimagining the Synagogue in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,” he identifies the “unprecedented number of modern, monumental houses of Jewish worship between 1830 and 1930 in Europe and North America was a remarkable departure from Jewish architectural history in the diaspora” (288). The second is by the eminent scholar Samuel Gruber, in “Modern Synagogue Architecture,” where he states, “Monumental synagogues in the State of Israel often present similar expressive tendencies to those in America and Europe” (324). A third impactful chapter was Maya Balakirsky Katz’s “The Sacred Architecture of Contemporary Hasidism,” where she finds that “Hasidic rebbes operated hundreds of such shtieblach, especially in the New York City neighbourhoods of Borough Park, Williamsburg, and Monsey and in the Israeli neighbourhoods of Bene Berak and Geula” (336). Together, the findings from these three chapters suggest that there is a significant quantity of Jewish material culture of the built environment that is being glossed over because the majority of synagogue/Jewish architecture scholars are focused on the more ancient structures of the Levant and Europe. More qualitative studies could be conducted on these underrepresented chapter subjects. Jewish Religious Architecture also lacks a concluding chapter where the content editor could have tied together big ideas across chapters as well as explained the reasoning for gaps in the scholarly contributions as directions for future research. The other chapters of Jewish Religious Architecture are of very good quality, but this publication is following an entrenched canon of Jewish art and architectural history at a time when the field of art and architectural history is considering new and innovative directions for studying visual material culture. This is exemplified by Yale University’s announcement eliminating the traditional western art history canon from its curriculum. While not as academic as Jewish Religious Architecture, this book has nearly the same pattern of chapter subjects as H. A. Meek’s The Synagogue (2003) and And I Shall Dwell Among Them: Historic Synagogues of the World by Yom Tov Assis (2000), among others. Since Jewish Religious Architecture is the first volume of the new Brill series Jews, Judaism, and the Arts, the series editors should consider current trends in art and architectural history scholarship in relation to that of or by Jews, such as the abandonment of an official canon of material.","PeriodicalId":52069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Jewish Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"602 - 603"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14725886.2023.2252364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
by the emerging scholar, Jess Olson, in “Reimagining the Synagogue in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries,” he identifies the “unprecedented number of modern, monumental houses of Jewish worship between 1830 and 1930 in Europe and North America was a remarkable departure from Jewish architectural history in the diaspora” (288). The second is by the eminent scholar Samuel Gruber, in “Modern Synagogue Architecture,” where he states, “Monumental synagogues in the State of Israel often present similar expressive tendencies to those in America and Europe” (324). A third impactful chapter was Maya Balakirsky Katz’s “The Sacred Architecture of Contemporary Hasidism,” where she finds that “Hasidic rebbes operated hundreds of such shtieblach, especially in the New York City neighbourhoods of Borough Park, Williamsburg, and Monsey and in the Israeli neighbourhoods of Bene Berak and Geula” (336). Together, the findings from these three chapters suggest that there is a significant quantity of Jewish material culture of the built environment that is being glossed over because the majority of synagogue/Jewish architecture scholars are focused on the more ancient structures of the Levant and Europe. More qualitative studies could be conducted on these underrepresented chapter subjects. Jewish Religious Architecture also lacks a concluding chapter where the content editor could have tied together big ideas across chapters as well as explained the reasoning for gaps in the scholarly contributions as directions for future research. The other chapters of Jewish Religious Architecture are of very good quality, but this publication is following an entrenched canon of Jewish art and architectural history at a time when the field of art and architectural history is considering new and innovative directions for studying visual material culture. This is exemplified by Yale University’s announcement eliminating the traditional western art history canon from its curriculum. While not as academic as Jewish Religious Architecture, this book has nearly the same pattern of chapter subjects as H. A. Meek’s The Synagogue (2003) and And I Shall Dwell Among Them: Historic Synagogues of the World by Yom Tov Assis (2000), among others. Since Jewish Religious Architecture is the first volume of the new Brill series Jews, Judaism, and the Arts, the series editors should consider current trends in art and architectural history scholarship in relation to that of or by Jews, such as the abandonment of an official canon of material.
新兴学者杰斯·奥尔森(Jess Olson)在《重新想象19世纪和20世纪的犹太教堂》(Reimagining the Synagogue in 19th and Twentieth世纪)一书中指出,“1830年至1930年间,欧洲和北美出现了数量空前的现代犹太纪念建筑,这与散居海外的犹太建筑史有着显著的不同”(288页)。第二种是由著名学者塞缪尔·格鲁伯(Samuel Gruber)在《现代犹太教堂建筑》(Modern Synagogue Architecture)一书中提出的,他说:“以色列的纪念犹太教堂往往呈现出与美国和欧洲相似的表达倾向”(324)。第三个影响深远的章节是玛雅·巴拉基斯基·卡茨的《当代哈西德主义的神圣建筑》,她在书中发现“哈西德派的反动分子经营着数百个这样的shtieblach,特别是在纽约市的Borough Park、威廉斯堡和Monsey社区,以及以色列的Bene Berak和Geula社区”(336)。综上所述,这三章的研究结果表明,由于大多数犹太教堂/犹太建筑学者专注于黎凡特和欧洲更古老的建筑,大量的犹太建筑环境物质文化被掩盖了。可以对这些代表性不足的章节主题进行更多的定性研究。《犹太宗教建筑》也缺少一个结束语章节,内容编辑可以将章节中的重要思想联系在一起,并解释学术贡献中存在差距的原因,作为未来研究的方向。《犹太宗教建筑》的其他章节质量非常好,但在艺术和建筑史领域正在考虑研究视觉物质文化的新创新方向的时候,这本出版物遵循了犹太艺术和建筑史的根深蒂固的经典。耶鲁大学宣布从其课程中取消传统的西方艺术史经典就是一个例证。虽然不像《犹太宗教建筑》那样学术性强,但这本书的章节主题模式与H. A. Meek的《犹太教堂》(2003)和Yom Tov Assis的《我将住在其中:世界上历史悠久的犹太教堂》(2000)等书几乎相同。由于《犹太宗教建筑》是新Brill系列《犹太人、犹太教和艺术》的第一卷,该系列的编辑应该考虑到与犹太人相关的艺术和建筑史学术的当前趋势,比如放弃官方的经典材料。