Marked variation in free radical injury between bovine and porcine endothelial cells cultured in different media.

Abstract

Previous studies produced models of oxygen-derived free radical (OFR) injury, using H(2)O(2) or xanthine/xanthine oxidase (X/XO), in cultured porcine aortic endothelium (PAE) and rat coronary endothelium. H(2)O(2) at 0.1 mM resulted in 50% viability in both cell types. To determine if comparable H(2)O(2) or X/XO concentrations have the same injurious effect on endothelium from other sources, models of OFR injury were developed for bovine aortic endothelium (BAE) and bovine brain microvessel endothelium (BBME). Varying concentrations of H(2)O(2) (0.01 to 6 mM) or X/XO (10 microM/0.1 to 0.3 U/mL) were added to medium 24 h prior to evaluating cell damage. Injury was assessed using the Trypan blue exclusion test (% viability) and by measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase into medium. H(2)O(2) concentrations required to produce 50% viability were >6 mM in BAE and BBME versus 1 mM in PAE when cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM). Similarly, BAE and BBME were less sensitive than PAE to damage by X/XO. Cells from both species were more sensitive to H(2)O(2) or X/XO injury when grown in Medium 199 (M199) versus DMEM. The most profound difference was observed with PAE where 50% viability was obtained with 0.12 versus 1.05 mM H(2)O(2) in M199 versus DMEM. These results indicate that bovine endothelial cells from aorta and brain are more resistant to free radical injury than PAE. The presence or absence of key media components (iron, pyruvate, cysteine, histidine) likely influences the extent of OFR injury.