Ethics of Obesity Legislation and Litigation: A Public-Health Policy Debate

A. Greer, Janice Butler Ryckeley
{"title":"Ethics of Obesity Legislation and Litigation: A Public-Health Policy Debate","authors":"A. Greer, Janice Butler Ryckeley","doi":"10.1089/BAR.2011.9945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obesity policy is an emerging priority among legislators and policy developers, who have posited that litigation helps to frame and support said policy. There is a national need to debate the merits of obesity legislation and litigation, and this requires a forum and a guiding framework. Evidence-based research often guides the policy but may be insufficient in terms of the ethical questions the legislation poses. Triangulation of evidence, theory, and ethical principles used in public health, and analysis of the level of autonomy represented in obesity policy, can be used in a counterargument to guide debate about obesity legislation and litigation. Healthcare professionals should engage in interprofessional, ethical scrutiny of legislation and litigation prior to offering support to obesity policy to ensure that it does not create an environment of social stigmatization. Obesity policy that does not integrate ethical principles and fails to seek counsel from the population of service may risk limiting c...","PeriodicalId":55589,"journal":{"name":"Bariatric Nursing and Surgical Patient Care","volume":"6 1","pages":"173-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/BAR.2011.9945","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bariatric Nursing and Surgical Patient Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/BAR.2011.9945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Obesity policy is an emerging priority among legislators and policy developers, who have posited that litigation helps to frame and support said policy. There is a national need to debate the merits of obesity legislation and litigation, and this requires a forum and a guiding framework. Evidence-based research often guides the policy but may be insufficient in terms of the ethical questions the legislation poses. Triangulation of evidence, theory, and ethical principles used in public health, and analysis of the level of autonomy represented in obesity policy, can be used in a counterargument to guide debate about obesity legislation and litigation. Healthcare professionals should engage in interprofessional, ethical scrutiny of legislation and litigation prior to offering support to obesity policy to ensure that it does not create an environment of social stigmatization. Obesity policy that does not integrate ethical principles and fails to seek counsel from the population of service may risk limiting c...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖立法和诉讼的伦理:一场公共卫生政策辩论
肥胖政策在立法者和政策制定者中是一个新兴的优先事项,他们认为诉讼有助于制定和支持所述政策。全国需要就肥胖立法和诉讼的优点进行辩论,这需要一个论坛和一个指导框架。基于证据的研究通常指导政策,但就立法提出的伦理问题而言,可能是不够的。对公共卫生中使用的证据、理论和伦理原则的三角测量,以及对肥胖政策中所代表的自治水平的分析,可以用于反论证,以指导有关肥胖立法和诉讼的辩论。在为肥胖政策提供支持之前,医疗保健专业人员应该对立法和诉讼进行跨专业的道德审查,以确保它不会创造一种社会污名化的环境。如果肥胖政策没有整合伦理原则,也没有征求服务人群的意见,可能会面临限制健康的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Using Anthropometric and Demographic Factors to Predict Small Bowel Length to Prevent Malnutrition in Bariatric Surgery. Obesity, Integral Leadership, and Health Policy A Resource Guide of Motivational Techniques for Weight Loss Assessing the Nurses' Knowledge of Bariatric Surgery: A Performance Improvement Project The Challenge of Patient Adherence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1