{"title":"Comparison of the open cluster and surface brightness distance scales for galactic classical cepheids","authors":"P. Fouqué, W. Gieren","doi":"10.1086/116679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have derived a new period-luminosity (PL) relation for galactic Cepheids in open clusters and associations from the Zero-Age Main-Sequence (ZAMS)-fitting method, using the most reliable cluster photometric data and Cepheid reddening data available, and homogeneous treatment of absorption corrections. For about half of the cluster Cepheid sample (17 stars) we also derive distances and absolute magnitudes from the surface-brightness method. From a comparison we find that the surface-brightness PL relation has a zero point about 0.15 mag brighter than the cluster ZAMS-fitting PL relation, but in view of the sources of systematic error involved in both methods, this discrepancy is clearly not significant","PeriodicalId":80579,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysical letters & communications","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysical letters & communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/116679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Abstract
We have derived a new period-luminosity (PL) relation for galactic Cepheids in open clusters and associations from the Zero-Age Main-Sequence (ZAMS)-fitting method, using the most reliable cluster photometric data and Cepheid reddening data available, and homogeneous treatment of absorption corrections. For about half of the cluster Cepheid sample (17 stars) we also derive distances and absolute magnitudes from the surface-brightness method. From a comparison we find that the surface-brightness PL relation has a zero point about 0.15 mag brighter than the cluster ZAMS-fitting PL relation, but in view of the sources of systematic error involved in both methods, this discrepancy is clearly not significant