Inappropriate emergency test ordering in a general hospital: preliminary reports.

F. Perraro, P. Rossi, C. Liva, A. Bulfoni, G. Ganzini, A. Giustinelli, E. Tonutti, P. Sala, P. Santini
{"title":"Inappropriate emergency test ordering in a general hospital: preliminary reports.","authors":"F. Perraro, P. Rossi, C. Liva, A. Bulfoni, G. Ganzini, A. Giustinelli, E. Tonutti, P. Sala, P. Santini","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.INTQHC.A036700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An assessment was made on emergency laboratory test ordering at Udine General Hospital (Italy) to investigate the reasons for the excessive number of requested tests. All the orders for emergency laboratory tests during one week in June 1990 were studied. For each test the time of the order was recorded for every day of the week. The most important aspect of our investigation is the distribution of the orders during the day: in fact, test orders reached two peaks, the upper between 7 and 11 a.m., and the lower between 3 and 6 p.m. The analysis of the record cards showed that 42% of the orders were inappropriate. These preliminary findings were very useful in making the consensus on a Quality Assurance program easier, to improve the use of the Emergency Laboratory by doctors and nurses. Some preliminary results in the Emergency Medicine Department confirmed the validity of this program.","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"4 1 1","pages":"77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.INTQHC.A036700","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.INTQHC.A036700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

An assessment was made on emergency laboratory test ordering at Udine General Hospital (Italy) to investigate the reasons for the excessive number of requested tests. All the orders for emergency laboratory tests during one week in June 1990 were studied. For each test the time of the order was recorded for every day of the week. The most important aspect of our investigation is the distribution of the orders during the day: in fact, test orders reached two peaks, the upper between 7 and 11 a.m., and the lower between 3 and 6 p.m. The analysis of the record cards showed that 42% of the orders were inappropriate. These preliminary findings were very useful in making the consensus on a Quality Assurance program easier, to improve the use of the Emergency Laboratory by doctors and nurses. Some preliminary results in the Emergency Medicine Department confirmed the validity of this program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合医院急诊检测命令不当:初步报告。
对乌迪内总医院(意大利)的紧急化验室检查订单进行了评估,以调查要求检查次数过多的原因。研究了1990年6月一周内所有紧急化验室检查的命令。对于每个测试,订单的时间记录为一周中的每一天。我们调查的最重要的方面是订单在白天的分布:事实上,测试订单有两个高峰,高峰在上午7点到11点之间,最低点在下午3点到6点之间。对记录卡的分析显示,42%的订单是不合适的。这些初步的发现对于使质量保证方案更容易达成共识,提高医生和护士对急诊实验室的使用非常有用。急诊医学部的一些初步结果证实了该方案的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The current status of autopsies in medical care in the USA. Decrease in the frequency of autopsies in Denmark after the introduction of a new autopsy act. Decreasing autopsy rate in Sweden reflects changing attitudes among clinicians. The meta-autopsy: changing techniques and attitudes towards the autopsy. The reliability of autopsy diagnostics: inter-observer variation between pathologists, a preliminary report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1