The access to CETA quotas: Extending CGE models with a market for quota licenses

Q open Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/qopen/qoac019
Tatjana Döbeling
{"title":"The access to CETA quotas: Extending CGE models with a market for quota licenses","authors":"Tatjana Döbeling","doi":"10.1093/qopen/qoac019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the market dynamics that are caused by tariff-rate quotas, particularly the effects of quota license allocation between heterogeneous commodities at the tariff line level. The allocation is endogenously modeled with a mixed complementarity problem approach for the case of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union. The model results are compared both with alternative models that resemble pre-existing approaches and with the real trade figures that have been collected since the trade agreement's implementation. Our analysis shows a bias toward more expensive commodities if the shadow value of a quota license manifests in a secondary license market. The same quota can thereby be binding to some commodities but not so for others. This feature of quotas can be crucial for policymakers who are concerned about price effects or who want to understand the effects of lumping together commodities of different quality in one quota.","PeriodicalId":87350,"journal":{"name":"Q open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoac019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyze the market dynamics that are caused by tariff-rate quotas, particularly the effects of quota license allocation between heterogeneous commodities at the tariff line level. The allocation is endogenously modeled with a mixed complementarity problem approach for the case of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada and the European Union. The model results are compared both with alternative models that resemble pre-existing approaches and with the real trade figures that have been collected since the trade agreement's implementation. Our analysis shows a bias toward more expensive commodities if the shadow value of a quota license manifests in a secondary license market. The same quota can thereby be binding to some commodities but not so for others. This feature of quotas can be crucial for policymakers who are concerned about price effects or who want to understand the effects of lumping together commodities of different quality in one quota.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获得CETA配额:通过配额许可市场扩展CGE模型
我们分析了由关税配额引起的市场动态,特别是在关税税目水平上异质商品之间配额许可证分配的影响。对加拿大和欧洲联盟之间的全面经济和贸易协定的情况,采用混合互补性问题方法内生地模拟分配。模型结果既与类似于已有方法的替代模型进行了比较,也与自贸易协定实施以来收集的实际贸易数据进行了比较。我们的分析显示,如果配额许可证的影子价值体现在二级许可证市场上,则倾向于购买更昂贵的商品。因此,同样的配额可能对某些商品具有约束力,但对其他商品则没有约束力。对于那些关心价格影响或想要了解将不同质量的商品集中在一个配额中的影响的政策制定者来说,配额的这一特征可能至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Can Predict Farmers’ Choices in Risky Gambles? Socioeconomic impacts of land restoration in agriculture: a systematic review Unpacking Stakeholder Perceptions on Challenges for Increasing Adoption of Solar- Powered Irrigation Systems in India: A Q Methodology Study Are lessons being learnt from the replication crisis or will the revolution devour its children? Open Q science from the editor's perspective Effects of institutional distrust on value estimates of stated preference surveys in developing countries: a choice experiment on conserving biodiversity within agricultural landscapes in a biodiversity hotspot
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1