Multi-professional clinical leadership training in healthcare

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION International Journal of Public Leadership Pub Date : 2016-11-04 DOI:10.1108/IJPL-03-2016-0005
R. Conn, A. Bali, E. Akers
{"title":"Multi-professional clinical leadership training in healthcare","authors":"R. Conn, A. Bali, E. Akers","doi":"10.1108/IJPL-03-2016-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of a structured clinical leadership programme on healthcare professionals working within the British National Health Service (NHS). Clinical leadership is now regarded as essential in addressing the complex challenges in the NHS, yet few trainees of any healthcare discipline receive formal training. The study describes a peer-led evaluation of a year-long, multidisciplinary, experiential programme, the “Darzi Fellowship”, based in London.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAn anonymous survey was analysed using a mixed-methods approach. Individual and collective experiences of fellows were evaluated, in particular the perceived impact the fellowship had on: the fellows themselves, their “host” organisation and the NHS as a whole.\n\n\nFindings\nA 90 per cent return rate was achieved. In all, 94 per cent reported that the experience had been valuable to them, 85 per cent feeling more empowered to effect change in healthcare systems. Crucial mechanisms to achieve this included increased self-awareness, personal reflection and the freedom to gain a greater understanding of organisations. Particular emphasis was placed on the value of developing clinical networks which promote collaboration across boundaries. Fellows emerged as more reflexive, critical and strategic thinkers.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper demonstrates the positive impact that clinical leadership training can have on participants, and the mechanisms by which future leaders can be created.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe novel, non-commissioned, peer-initiated and peer-led evaluation describes the personal experiences of fellows in a unique, multidisciplinary clinical leadership programme. The authors hope this will inform the development of future schemes in the NHS and provide learning for an international healthcare audience.\n","PeriodicalId":43080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Leadership","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/IJPL-03-2016-0005","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-03-2016-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of a structured clinical leadership programme on healthcare professionals working within the British National Health Service (NHS). Clinical leadership is now regarded as essential in addressing the complex challenges in the NHS, yet few trainees of any healthcare discipline receive formal training. The study describes a peer-led evaluation of a year-long, multidisciplinary, experiential programme, the “Darzi Fellowship”, based in London. Design/methodology/approach An anonymous survey was analysed using a mixed-methods approach. Individual and collective experiences of fellows were evaluated, in particular the perceived impact the fellowship had on: the fellows themselves, their “host” organisation and the NHS as a whole. Findings A 90 per cent return rate was achieved. In all, 94 per cent reported that the experience had been valuable to them, 85 per cent feeling more empowered to effect change in healthcare systems. Crucial mechanisms to achieve this included increased self-awareness, personal reflection and the freedom to gain a greater understanding of organisations. Particular emphasis was placed on the value of developing clinical networks which promote collaboration across boundaries. Fellows emerged as more reflexive, critical and strategic thinkers. Practical implications This paper demonstrates the positive impact that clinical leadership training can have on participants, and the mechanisms by which future leaders can be created. Originality/value The novel, non-commissioned, peer-initiated and peer-led evaluation describes the personal experiences of fellows in a unique, multidisciplinary clinical leadership programme. The authors hope this will inform the development of future schemes in the NHS and provide learning for an international healthcare audience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健多专业临床领导培训
目的本文的目的是检查在英国国家卫生服务(NHS)内工作的医疗保健专业人员的结构化临床领导方案的影响。临床领导现在被认为是解决NHS复杂挑战的必要条件,但很少有任何医疗保健学科的受训者接受正式培训。这项研究描述了一项由同行主导的评估,该评估是对一个为期一年、多学科、体验式的项目——设在伦敦的“达兹奖学金”(Darzi Fellowship)——进行的。设计/方法/方法采用混合方法分析了一项匿名调查。研究员的个人和集体经历进行了评估,特别是奖学金对研究员本身、他们的“东道主”组织和整个NHS的感知影响。调查结果:回复率达90%。总的来说,94%的人表示,这种经历对他们很有价值,85%的人觉得自己更有能力推动医疗体系的变革。实现这一目标的关键机制包括提高自我意识、个人反思和获得更多了解组织的自由。特别强调了发展促进跨界合作的临床网络的价值。研究员变成了更具反思性、批判性和战略性的思想家。本文论证了临床领导力培训对参与者的积极影响,以及培养未来领导者的机制。独创性/价值这种新颖的、非委托的、同行发起的和同行主导的评估描述了研究员在一个独特的、多学科的临床领导力项目中的个人经历。作者希望这将告知NHS未来方案的发展,并为国际医疗保健受众提供学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Feasibility in embedding charismatic leadership strategies into social work applications Empowering leadership and employee well-being: the role of psychological empowerment and time pressure Interrogating the practice of integrity in Tanzania public service Enabling social change: a case study of complex adaptive leadership within an informal settlement in Iran Major criteria of credible integrated development planning in local government: city of Mbombela, Ehlanzeni District, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1