Happy 20-year anniversary non-GAAP earnings: a systematic review of the literature

IF 1.1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting Literature Pub Date : 2023-06-02 DOI:10.1108/jal-02-2023-0035
M. Brosnan, Keith Duncan, Tim Hasso, Janice Hollindale
{"title":"Happy 20-year anniversary non-GAAP earnings: a systematic review of the literature","authors":"M. Brosnan, Keith Duncan, Tim Hasso, Janice Hollindale","doi":"10.1108/jal-02-2023-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIt has been two decades since the first academic paper shone a spotlight on non-GAAP earnings. The past 20 years of research investigates concerns over the misuse of these disclosures and resulted in some significant changes to accounting and reporting standards across the globe. This paper aims to document the history of non-GAAP reporting and outline the emerging themes of the now matured practice of non-GAAP reporting.Design/methodology/approachThis systematic literature review searches two popular databases to identify the academic publications relating to non-GAAP reporting between 2002 and 2022. The paper uses bibliographic mapping to present the key statistics of the non-GAAP reporting field of research.FindingsThe non-GAAP reporting environment started out as the “wild West’ but, through regulation and public awareness, emerged as an important supplement to the traditional outputs of financial reporting. Current consensus is recent non-GAAP earnings are informative to users but there is lack of research into qualitative non-GAAP disclosures and the vast body of archival research needs triangulating with more experimental studies.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the literature by documenting the past 20 years of non-GAAP reporting and identifying the important existing and emerging research areas concerning non-GAAP earnings disclosures.","PeriodicalId":45666,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-02-2023-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeIt has been two decades since the first academic paper shone a spotlight on non-GAAP earnings. The past 20 years of research investigates concerns over the misuse of these disclosures and resulted in some significant changes to accounting and reporting standards across the globe. This paper aims to document the history of non-GAAP reporting and outline the emerging themes of the now matured practice of non-GAAP reporting.Design/methodology/approachThis systematic literature review searches two popular databases to identify the academic publications relating to non-GAAP reporting between 2002 and 2022. The paper uses bibliographic mapping to present the key statistics of the non-GAAP reporting field of research.FindingsThe non-GAAP reporting environment started out as the “wild West’ but, through regulation and public awareness, emerged as an important supplement to the traditional outputs of financial reporting. Current consensus is recent non-GAAP earnings are informative to users but there is lack of research into qualitative non-GAAP disclosures and the vast body of archival research needs triangulating with more experimental studies.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the literature by documenting the past 20 years of non-GAAP reporting and identifying the important existing and emerging research areas concerning non-GAAP earnings disclosures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非公认会计准则收益20周年快乐:对文献的系统回顾
自第一篇学术论文聚焦非公认会计准则收益以来,已经过去了20年。过去20年的研究调查了对滥用这些披露的担忧,并导致全球会计和报告标准发生了一些重大变化。本文旨在记录非公认会计准则报告的历史,并概述了现在成熟的非公认会计准则报告实践的新主题。设计/方法/方法本系统的文献综述搜索了两个流行的数据库,以确定2002年至2022年间与非公认会计准则报告相关的学术出版物。本文使用书目映射来呈现非公认会计准则报告研究领域的关键统计数据。非公认会计准则报告环境开始是“狂野的西部”,但通过监管和公众意识,成为传统财务报告产出的重要补充。目前的共识是,最近的非公认会计准则收益对用户来说是有益的,但缺乏对定性非公认会计准则披露的研究,而且大量的档案研究需要与更多的实验研究进行三角测量。原创性/价值本文通过记录过去20年的非公认会计准则报告并确定有关非公认会计准则收益披露的重要现有和新兴研究领域,为文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The objective of the Journal is to publish papers that make a fundamental and substantial contribution to the understanding of accounting phenomena. To this end, the Journal intends to publish papers that (1) synthesize an area of research in a concise and rigorous manner to assist academics and others to gain knowledge and appreciation of diverse research areas or (2) present high quality, multi-method, original research on a broad range of topics relevant to accounting, auditing and taxation. Topical coverage is broad and inclusive covering virtually all aspects of accounting. Consistent with the historical mission of the Journal, it is expected that the lead article of each issue will be a synthesis article on an important research topic. Other manuscripts to be included in a given issue will be a mix of synthesis and original research papers. In addition to traditional research topics and methods, we actively solicit manuscripts of the including, but not limited to, the following: • meta-analyses • field studies • critiques of papers published in other journals • emerging developments in accounting theory • commentaries on current issues • innovative experimental research with strong grounding in cognitive, social or anthropological sciences • creative archival analyses using non-standard methodologies or data sources with strong grounding in various social sciences • book reviews • "idea" papers that don''t fit into other established categories.
期刊最新文献
Carbon emission trading scheme and earnings smoothness Carbon emission trading scheme and earnings smoothness Does mandating gender quota in corporate boards affect firms’ credit ratings? Evidence from India Does mandating gender quota in corporate boards affect firms’ credit ratings? Evidence from India Strategic responses of the clients of multinational audit firms to corporate governance audit regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1