{"title":"A study on text entry methods based on eye gestures","authors":"M. Porta","doi":"10.1108/JAT-12-2013-0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the two main existing text input techniques based on “eye gestures” – namely EyeWrite and Eye-S – and compare them to each other and to the traditional “virtual keyboard” approach. Design/methodology/approach – The study primarily aims to assess user performance at the very beginning of the learning process. However, a partial longitudinal evaluation is also provided. Two kinds of experiments have been implemented involving 14 testers. Findings – Results show that while the virtual keyboard is faster, EyeWrite and Eye-S are also appreciated and can be viable alternatives (after a proper training period). Practical implications – Writing methods based on eye gestures deserve special attention, as they require less screen space and need limited tracking precision. This study highlights the fact that gesture-based techniques imply a greater initial effort, and require proper training not only to gain knowledge of eye interaction per se, but also for learning...","PeriodicalId":89962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of assistive technologies","volume":"9 1","pages":"48-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JAT-12-2013-0037","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of assistive technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JAT-12-2013-0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the two main existing text input techniques based on “eye gestures” – namely EyeWrite and Eye-S – and compare them to each other and to the traditional “virtual keyboard” approach. Design/methodology/approach – The study primarily aims to assess user performance at the very beginning of the learning process. However, a partial longitudinal evaluation is also provided. Two kinds of experiments have been implemented involving 14 testers. Findings – Results show that while the virtual keyboard is faster, EyeWrite and Eye-S are also appreciated and can be viable alternatives (after a proper training period). Practical implications – Writing methods based on eye gestures deserve special attention, as they require less screen space and need limited tracking precision. This study highlights the fact that gesture-based techniques imply a greater initial effort, and require proper training not only to gain knowledge of eye interaction per se, but also for learning...
目的-本文的目的是考虑两种主要的基于“眼睛手势”的现有文本输入技术-即EyeWrite和eye - s -并将它们相互比较并与传统的“虚拟键盘”方法进行比较。设计/方法论/方法——这项研究的主要目的是在学习过程的最初阶段评估用户的表现。然而,也提供了部分纵向评价。进行了两类实验,涉及14名测试者。研究结果-结果表明,虽然虚拟键盘更快,但EyeWrite和Eye-S也很受欢迎,可以作为可行的替代方案(经过适当的培训)。实际意义-基于眼睛手势的书写方法值得特别关注,因为它们需要较少的屏幕空间和有限的跟踪精度。这项研究强调了这样一个事实,基于手势的技术意味着更大的初始努力,并且需要适当的训练,不仅要获得眼睛互动本身的知识,还要学习……