Pupils’ experience of noise in two acoustically different classrooms

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Facilities Pub Date : 2023-03-17 DOI:10.1108/f-03-2022-0036
J. Radun, Mikko Lindberg, A. Lahti, M. Veermans, Reijo Alakoivu, V. Hongisto
{"title":"Pupils’ experience of noise in two acoustically different classrooms","authors":"J. Radun, Mikko Lindberg, A. Lahti, M. Veermans, Reijo Alakoivu, V. Hongisto","doi":"10.1108/f-03-2022-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine activity-related sound levels and pupils’ perceptions of the acoustic environment in two classrooms, one of which was a traditional classroom (Reference classroom, reverberation time (RT) 0.54 s) and the other a refurbished classroom (Demo classroom, RT 0.32 s).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThree types of data were gathered: room acoustic measurements, activity sound levels during different activities and pupils’ subjective experience concerning factors related to acoustics. Pupils, 10–11 years old (N = 34), estimated their subjective experience in general and after four test lessons. Teachers planned the test lessons to have four different lesson types: quiet work, one-person speaking, group work and activity-based work. The sound levels of activities were measured during the test lessons.\n\n\nFindings\nThe activity sound levels were 2–13 dB LAeq lower in the Demo classroom than in the Reference classroom, depending on lesson type. Pupils were less annoyed by noise in the Demo than in the Reference classroom. Pupils’ speech was the most annoying sound source. More pupils were annoyed by it in the Reference classroom (65%) than in the Demo classroom (15%). Hearing the teacher while not seeing her face, concentrating on teaching and sitting in one’s place were estimated easier in the Demo classroom than in the Reference classroom.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study offers a new approach using test lessons for studying activity sounds in schools. Activity sounds and their annoyance can be significantly diminished by classroom refurbishments.\n","PeriodicalId":47595,"journal":{"name":"Facilities","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-03-2022-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine activity-related sound levels and pupils’ perceptions of the acoustic environment in two classrooms, one of which was a traditional classroom (Reference classroom, reverberation time (RT) 0.54 s) and the other a refurbished classroom (Demo classroom, RT 0.32 s). Design/methodology/approach Three types of data were gathered: room acoustic measurements, activity sound levels during different activities and pupils’ subjective experience concerning factors related to acoustics. Pupils, 10–11 years old (N = 34), estimated their subjective experience in general and after four test lessons. Teachers planned the test lessons to have four different lesson types: quiet work, one-person speaking, group work and activity-based work. The sound levels of activities were measured during the test lessons. Findings The activity sound levels were 2–13 dB LAeq lower in the Demo classroom than in the Reference classroom, depending on lesson type. Pupils were less annoyed by noise in the Demo than in the Reference classroom. Pupils’ speech was the most annoying sound source. More pupils were annoyed by it in the Reference classroom (65%) than in the Demo classroom (15%). Hearing the teacher while not seeing her face, concentrating on teaching and sitting in one’s place were estimated easier in the Demo classroom than in the Reference classroom. Originality/value This study offers a new approach using test lessons for studying activity sounds in schools. Activity sounds and their annoyance can be significantly diminished by classroom refurbishments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生在两个不同教室的噪音体验
本研究旨在研究两个教室中与活动相关的声级和学生对声环境的感知,其中一个教室是传统教室(参考教室,混响时间(RT) 0.54 s),另一个教室是翻新教室(演示教室,RT 0.32 s)。设计/方法/方法收集了三种类型的数据:室内声学测量,不同活动期间的活动声级和学生对声学相关因素的主观体验。10-11岁的学生(N = 34)在四个测试课程后对他们的主观体验进行了总体评估。老师们计划的测试课程有四种不同的课程类型:安静作业、一人发言、小组作业和活动作业。在测试课程中测量活动的声音水平。结果:根据课程类型的不同,示范教室的活动声级比参考教室低2-13 dB LAeq。与参考教室相比,示范教室的学生对噪音不那么反感。学生的说话声是最烦人的声源。在参考教室(65%)比在演示教室(15%)更多的学生对此感到厌烦。与参考课堂相比,在演示课堂中更容易听到老师的声音而不看她的脸,集中精力教学和坐在自己的位置上。原创性/价值本研究提供了一种使用测试课程来研究学校活动声音的新方法。教室装修可以大大减少活动的声音和它们的烦恼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Facilities
Facilities MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The journal offers thorough, independent and expert papers to inform relevant audiences of thinking and practice in the field, including topics such as: ■Intelligent buildings ■Post-occupancy evaluation (building evaluation) ■Relocation and change management ■Sick building syndrome ■Ergonomics and workplace design ■Environmental and workplace psychology ■Briefing, design and construction ■Energy consumption ■Quality initiatives ■Infrastructure management
期刊最新文献
Facility network design by using k-mean and elbow method: a case of Indian handloom industry Investigating the role of path architecture complexity in users’ movement patterns in hospital circulation systems: case studies in Golestan, Iran Students with disabilities (SWDs) and facilities accessibility in a northern Nigerian public university: dismantling exclusion in achieving SDG4 Students’ support facilities and academic adjustment among first-year undergraduates: evidence from a Nigerian public university Barriers to the adoption of energy management systems in residential buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1