Interviews with Edward Teller and Eugene P. Wigner

J. Brink, R. Haden
{"title":"Interviews with Edward Teller and Eugene P. Wigner","authors":"J. Brink, R. Haden","doi":"10.1109/MAHC.1989.10027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teller: There is a very real problem. The United States used to be, by a big margin, the world’s leader in technology. This is no longer so. We hear in computers a lot about competition, for instance, by the Japanese. That, I think, in part, is due to mistakes, not sufficient emphasis on theoretical and applied science in our educational system. But I think it is not just the educational system. It is a general cultural problem of which all schools and universities are a part. And I have two complaints: One is that people can be ignorant of very basic facts such as entropy, that it is growing all the time; such as the irreversibility of events, or even about relativity. We understand that if a person cannot spell, he is uneducated; but a person can be considered highly educated and intellectual and still not know simple facts about the physical world in which we live. That is a problem of sorts. There is another issue, and it is even more serious. People are saying to a greater and greater extent, or at least very loudly, that technology is dangerous. Today somebody came to me and asked me if computers are developed more and more, will that not be a danger? I believe the Japanese and the Soviet Union and many others have a great advantage; they know that technology is necessary for a good life, for many other things, even for intellectual growth. When I came to the United States more than 50 years ago, I believed that then technology was valued too highly in the United States. I have changed my opinion. I don’t know whether I changed or the world changed. I believe, today, that in the United States, technology is not valued highly enough. And something I hope our universities will do is to tell the young people how very important the development of science and technology has to be and that science and technology are, in fact, inseparable.","PeriodicalId":80486,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the history of computing","volume":"11 1","pages":"177-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/MAHC.1989.10027","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the history of computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.1989.10027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Teller: There is a very real problem. The United States used to be, by a big margin, the world’s leader in technology. This is no longer so. We hear in computers a lot about competition, for instance, by the Japanese. That, I think, in part, is due to mistakes, not sufficient emphasis on theoretical and applied science in our educational system. But I think it is not just the educational system. It is a general cultural problem of which all schools and universities are a part. And I have two complaints: One is that people can be ignorant of very basic facts such as entropy, that it is growing all the time; such as the irreversibility of events, or even about relativity. We understand that if a person cannot spell, he is uneducated; but a person can be considered highly educated and intellectual and still not know simple facts about the physical world in which we live. That is a problem of sorts. There is another issue, and it is even more serious. People are saying to a greater and greater extent, or at least very loudly, that technology is dangerous. Today somebody came to me and asked me if computers are developed more and more, will that not be a danger? I believe the Japanese and the Soviet Union and many others have a great advantage; they know that technology is necessary for a good life, for many other things, even for intellectual growth. When I came to the United States more than 50 years ago, I believed that then technology was valued too highly in the United States. I have changed my opinion. I don’t know whether I changed or the world changed. I believe, today, that in the United States, technology is not valued highly enough. And something I hope our universities will do is to tell the young people how very important the development of science and technology has to be and that science and technology are, in fact, inseparable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采访爱德华·泰勒和尤金·p·维格纳
出纳员:有一个非常现实的问题。美国曾经是世界科技领域遥遥领先的领导者。现在已经不是这样了。我们在计算机领域经常听到关于竞争的说法,比如日本人。我认为,这在一定程度上是由于我们的教育系统对理论科学和应用科学的重视不够。但我认为这不仅仅是教育系统的问题。这是一个普遍的文化问题,所有的学校和大学都是其中的一部分。我有两个抱怨:一是人们可能会忽略一些非常基本的事实,比如熵,熵一直在增长;比如事件的不可逆性,甚至相对论。我们知道,如果一个人不会拼写,他就没有受过教育;但是,一个人可能被认为受过高等教育,知识渊博,但仍然不知道我们所生活的物质世界的简单事实。这是一个问题。还有一个更严重的问题。人们在越来越大的程度上,或者至少是非常大声地说,技术是危险的。今天有人来问我,如果电脑越来越发达,那不是一种危险吗?我相信日本、苏联和许多其他国家有很大的优势;他们知道科技对于美好生活,对于许多其他事情,甚至对于智力发展都是必要的。当我50多年前来到美国时,我认为当时美国对技术的重视程度太高了。我改变了我的看法。我不知道是我变了还是世界变了。我认为,在今天的美国,技术没有得到足够的重视。我希望我们的大学能做的是告诉年轻人科学技术的发展是多么重要,科学和技术实际上是不可分割的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sharing Information (or Not) for Computer Development Establishing the Field of Computer Science Who Will Control Atomic Power? Defining Relationships Among Computers, People, and Information Defining Terms and Establishing Priorities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1