Financial impact of medical technology

Binseng Wang, Richard W. Eliason, S. Richards, L. Hertzler, Robert Moorey
{"title":"Financial impact of medical technology","authors":"Binseng Wang, Richard W. Eliason, S. Richards, L. Hertzler, Robert Moorey","doi":"10.1109/MEMB.2008.921548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he continuous rise of health-care costs has been troubling Americans for some time, especially the professionals involved in the various stages of medical device lifecycle, e.g., research, development, production, sales, regulation, procurement, maintenance, and disposal. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), health-care expenditures are expected to reach 18.7% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2014, while it was only 8.8% in 1980 [1]. Although there is little doubt that technology is essential to providing quality care to patients, its strong impact on the continual rise of healthcare costs has prompted many to question its value and effective management [2]–[6]. A segment of technology that has received much scrutiny is medical devices, which can be divided into three groups: implants (including prosthetic devices), equipment (ranging from defibrillators to surgical robots), and supplies (gloves, catheters, medical gases, etc.). Among the medical devices, equipment has often been singled out probably because of its size, high capital investment, and costly life-long maintenance requirements. Thus, it is not difficult to find studies on specific equipment such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scanners, and radiation therapy equipment [4], [7], [8]. On the other hand, few have analyzed how hospitals manage their entire arsenals of medical equipment in the midst of the delicate balancing act of keeping up with the arms race, ensuring quality of care, and remaining financially viable. This article reports an attempt to understand how acute care hospitals deploy medical equipment using data provided by 174 organizations. In particular, the cost of equipment acquisition and maintenance is compared to those of other medical devices and drugs. Although this sample is small ( 3% of all American hospitals), it is fairly evenly and widely distributed in terms of size, location, ownership, and teaching characteristics. The reason for focusing on hospitals is because hospital care accounts for the largest share ( 31%) of the national health-care expenditure [1]. Although the other segments of health-care industry (e.g., nursing homes, homecare, and personal care) also employ equipment, the hospitals are by far the largest consumers of medical equipment (but not necessarily of other types of devices).","PeriodicalId":50391,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine","volume":"10 1","pages":"80-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/MEMB.2008.921548","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2008.921548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

he continuous rise of health-care costs has been troubling Americans for some time, especially the professionals involved in the various stages of medical device lifecycle, e.g., research, development, production, sales, regulation, procurement, maintenance, and disposal. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), health-care expenditures are expected to reach 18.7% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2014, while it was only 8.8% in 1980 [1]. Although there is little doubt that technology is essential to providing quality care to patients, its strong impact on the continual rise of healthcare costs has prompted many to question its value and effective management [2]–[6]. A segment of technology that has received much scrutiny is medical devices, which can be divided into three groups: implants (including prosthetic devices), equipment (ranging from defibrillators to surgical robots), and supplies (gloves, catheters, medical gases, etc.). Among the medical devices, equipment has often been singled out probably because of its size, high capital investment, and costly life-long maintenance requirements. Thus, it is not difficult to find studies on specific equipment such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scanners, and radiation therapy equipment [4], [7], [8]. On the other hand, few have analyzed how hospitals manage their entire arsenals of medical equipment in the midst of the delicate balancing act of keeping up with the arms race, ensuring quality of care, and remaining financially viable. This article reports an attempt to understand how acute care hospitals deploy medical equipment using data provided by 174 organizations. In particular, the cost of equipment acquisition and maintenance is compared to those of other medical devices and drugs. Although this sample is small ( 3% of all American hospitals), it is fairly evenly and widely distributed in terms of size, location, ownership, and teaching characteristics. The reason for focusing on hospitals is because hospital care accounts for the largest share ( 31%) of the national health-care expenditure [1]. Although the other segments of health-care industry (e.g., nursing homes, homecare, and personal care) also employ equipment, the hospitals are by far the largest consumers of medical equipment (but not necessarily of other types of devices).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗技术对财务的影响
一段时间以来,医疗保健费用的持续上涨一直困扰着美国人,尤其是参与医疗器械生命周期各个阶段(如研究、开发、生产、销售、监管、采购、维护和处置)的专业人员。根据医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的数据,到2014年,医疗保健支出预计将达到国内生产总值(GDP)的18.7%,而1980年这一比例仅为8.8%。尽管毫无疑问,技术对于为患者提供高质量的护理至关重要,但它对医疗成本持续上升的强烈影响促使许多人质疑其价值和有效管理。医疗设备是一项受到严格审查的技术,可分为三大类:植入物(包括假肢设备)、设备(从除颤器到手术机器人)和用品(手套、导管、医用气体等)。在医疗设备中,设备往往被挑出来,可能是因为它的大小,高资本投资和昂贵的终身维护要求。因此,不难发现对磁共振成像(MRI)、计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描仪、放射治疗设备[4]、[7]、[8]等特定设备的研究。另一方面,很少有人分析医院是如何在跟上军备竞赛、确保护理质量和保持财务可行性的微妙平衡中管理其整个医疗设备库的。本文试图了解急症护理医院如何使用174个组织提供的数据部署医疗设备。特别是,将设备购置和维护费用与其他医疗器械和药品的费用进行比较。虽然这个样本很小(占所有美国医院的3%),但在规模、位置、所有权和教学特点方面分布相当均匀和广泛。之所以把重点放在医院,是因为医院护理占全国医疗保健支出的最大份额(31%)。虽然医疗保健行业的其他部门(例如,疗养院、家庭护理和个人护理)也使用设备,但医院是医疗设备(但不一定是其他类型设备)的最大消费者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine
IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Content reporting and effectiveness of therapeutic exercise in the management of massive rotator cuff tears: A systematic review with 490 patients. Gerontechnology Biological Database Modeling (Chen, J. and Sidhhu, A.S.; 2008) [Book Reviews] Biomedical Surfaces (Ramsden, J.; 2008) [Book Review] Holographic Imaging (Benton, S.A. and Bove, V.M.; 2008) [Book Review]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1