Career Prospects in the London Metropolitan Police in the Early Twentieth Century

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Historical Sociology Pub Date : 1991-12-01 DOI:10.1111/J.1467-6443.1991.TB00154.X
H. Shpayer-Makov
{"title":"Career Prospects in the London Metropolitan Police in the Early Twentieth Century","authors":"H. Shpayer-Makov","doi":"10.1111/J.1467-6443.1991.TB00154.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the strategies increasingly used by employers in the nineteenth century to make work more efficient was the promise of internal promotion, based on uniformity of treatment and selection by merit. The Metropolitan Police had pursued this strategy since the establishment of the force in 1829. Presentations of the promotion system were couched in challenging language, promising to reward all conscientious officers with a rise to a higher rank. Promotion brought with it increased pay, better work conditions, greater authority and prestige, and for some officers real social and economic mobility. This paper examines the principles underlying the promotion system in the Metropolitan Police, the terms in which they were formulated and their application. Of crucial importance are these questions: Who benefitted from the opportunity offered by the Metropolitan Police? What was the relationship between rhetoric and policy? What personal factors helped determine upward mobility? Did the police offer real equality of opportunity? A computer-based analysis of the careers of all recruits to the Metropolitan Police at the turn of the century provides firm answers and suggests patterns of mobility outside the Metropolitan Police.","PeriodicalId":46194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Sociology","volume":"4 1","pages":"380-408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1467-6443.1991.TB00154.X","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-6443.1991.TB00154.X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

One of the strategies increasingly used by employers in the nineteenth century to make work more efficient was the promise of internal promotion, based on uniformity of treatment and selection by merit. The Metropolitan Police had pursued this strategy since the establishment of the force in 1829. Presentations of the promotion system were couched in challenging language, promising to reward all conscientious officers with a rise to a higher rank. Promotion brought with it increased pay, better work conditions, greater authority and prestige, and for some officers real social and economic mobility. This paper examines the principles underlying the promotion system in the Metropolitan Police, the terms in which they were formulated and their application. Of crucial importance are these questions: Who benefitted from the opportunity offered by the Metropolitan Police? What was the relationship between rhetoric and policy? What personal factors helped determine upward mobility? Did the police offer real equality of opportunity? A computer-based analysis of the careers of all recruits to the Metropolitan Police at the turn of the century provides firm answers and suggests patterns of mobility outside the Metropolitan Police.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪初伦敦大都会警察的职业前景
19世纪,雇主为提高工作效率而越来越多地采用的策略之一是承诺在待遇统一和择优的基础上进行内部晋升。伦敦警察厅自1829年成立以来一直奉行这一战略。在介绍晋升制度时,他们使用了颇具挑战性的语言,承诺将奖励所有有责任心的军官,让他们获得更高的军衔。晋升带来了更高的工资、更好的工作条件、更大的权威和声望,对一些军官来说,还带来了真正的社会和经济流动性。本文探讨了伦敦警察厅晋升制度的基本原则、制定这些原则的术语及其应用。这些问题至关重要:谁从伦敦警察厅提供的机会中受益?言论和政策之间的关系是什么?哪些个人因素决定了向上流动?警察提供了真正平等的机会吗?一项对世纪之交伦敦警察厅所有新入职人员职业生涯的计算机分析提供了确凿的答案,并提出了伦敦警察厅以外的人员流动模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Edited by a distinguished international panel of historians, anthropologists, geographers and sociologists, the Journal of Historical Sociology is both interdisciplinary in approach and innovative in content. As well as refereed articles, the journal presents review essays and commentary in its Issues and Agendas section, and aims to provoke discussion and debate.
期刊最新文献
Political Economies of Knowledge Production: On and Around Academic Dependency In What Ways We Depend: Academic Dependency Theory and the Development of East Asian Sociology Rethinking the Rise of China: A Postcolonial Critique of China and a Chinese Critique of the Postcolonial Are We Still Dependent? Academic Dependency Theory After 20 Years The Arab Spring and Revolutionary Theory: An Intervention in a Debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1