The Association between Health Insurance Coverage and Diabetes Care; Data from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2005-03-10 DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0d362.x
Karin M. Nelson, Michael K. Chapko, Gayle Reiber, Edward J. Boyko
{"title":"The Association between Health Insurance Coverage and Diabetes Care; Data from the 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System","authors":"Karin M. Nelson,&nbsp;Michael K. Chapko,&nbsp;Gayle Reiber,&nbsp;Edward J. Boyko","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0d362.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective. </b> To describe the association between type of health insurance coverage and the quality of care provided to individuals with diabetes in the United States.</p><p><b>Data Source. </b> The 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.</p><p><b>Study Design. </b> Our study cohort included individuals who reported a diagnosis of diabetes (<i>n</i>=11,647). We performed bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses by age greater or less than 65 years to examine the association of health insurance coverage with diabetes-specific quality of care measures, controlling for the effects of race/ethnicity, annual income, gender, education, and insulin use.</p><p><b>Principal Findings. </b> Most individuals with diabetes are covered by private insurance (39 percent) or Medicare (44 percent). Among persons under the age of 65 years, 11 percent were uninsured. The uninsured were more likely to be African American or Hispanic and report low incomes. The uninsured were less likely to report annual dilated eye exams, foot examinations, or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) tests and less likely to perform daily blood glucose monitoring than those with private health insurance. We found few differences in quality indicators between Medicare, Medicaid, or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as compared with private insurance coverage. Persons who received care through the VA were more likely to report taking a diabetes education class and HbA1c testing than those covered by private insurance.</p><p><b>Conclusions. </b> Uninsured adults with diabetes are predominantly minority and low income and receive fewer preventive services than individuals with health insurance. Among the insured, different types of health insurance coverage appear to provide similar levels of care, except for higher rates of diabetes education and HbA1c testing at the VA.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":"40 2","pages":"361-372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0d362.x","citationCount":"156","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0d362.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 156

Abstract

Objective. To describe the association between type of health insurance coverage and the quality of care provided to individuals with diabetes in the United States.

Data Source. The 2000 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Study Design. Our study cohort included individuals who reported a diagnosis of diabetes (n=11,647). We performed bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses by age greater or less than 65 years to examine the association of health insurance coverage with diabetes-specific quality of care measures, controlling for the effects of race/ethnicity, annual income, gender, education, and insulin use.

Principal Findings. Most individuals with diabetes are covered by private insurance (39 percent) or Medicare (44 percent). Among persons under the age of 65 years, 11 percent were uninsured. The uninsured were more likely to be African American or Hispanic and report low incomes. The uninsured were less likely to report annual dilated eye exams, foot examinations, or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) tests and less likely to perform daily blood glucose monitoring than those with private health insurance. We found few differences in quality indicators between Medicare, Medicaid, or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) as compared with private insurance coverage. Persons who received care through the VA were more likely to report taking a diabetes education class and HbA1c testing than those covered by private insurance.

Conclusions. Uninsured adults with diabetes are predominantly minority and low income and receive fewer preventive services than individuals with health insurance. Among the insured, different types of health insurance coverage appear to provide similar levels of care, except for higher rates of diabetes education and HbA1c testing at the VA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康保险覆盖面与糖尿病护理的关系数据来自2000年行为风险因素监测系统
目标。描述美国医疗保险覆盖类型与提供给糖尿病患者的护理质量之间的关系。数据源。2000年行为风险因素监测系统。研究设计。我们的研究队列包括报告诊断为糖尿病的个体(n=11,647)。我们对年龄大于或小于65岁的患者进行了双变量和多变量logistic回归分析,在控制种族/民族、年收入、性别、教育程度和胰岛素使用的影响下,检验健康保险覆盖率与糖尿病特定护理质量措施的关系。主要的发现。大多数糖尿病患者都有私人保险(39%)或医疗保险(44%)。65岁以下的人中,11%没有保险。没有保险的更有可能是非裔美国人或西班牙裔,收入较低。与有私人医疗保险的人相比,没有保险的人报告年度眼科检查、足部检查或血红蛋白糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测试的可能性更小,每日血糖监测的可能性也更小。我们发现,与私人保险相比,医疗保险、医疗补助或退伍军人事务部(VA)的质量指标几乎没有差异。通过退伍军人管理局接受治疗的人比那些接受私人保险的人更有可能报告参加糖尿病教育课程和HbA1c测试。没有医疗保险的成年糖尿病患者主要是少数族裔和低收入人群,与有医疗保险的人相比,他们获得的预防服务更少。在被保险人中,不同类型的健康保险似乎提供了相似的护理水平,除了退伍军人事务部的糖尿病教育和糖化血红蛋白检测率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Examining the Potential Role of Opioid Settlement Funds in the Face of Impending Federal Budget Reductions for Substance Use Disorders. Mind the Activation Gap: Factors Associated With Low Patient Activation Among Dual-Eligible Versus Medicare-Only Beneficiaries. Identifying Bariatric Surgery Patients With the Most Favorable Cost Outcomes. A Machine Learning Model to Improve Risk Adjustment Accuracy in Medicare. The All-Payer Claims Database After the Gobeille Supreme Court Decision: Assessing the Impact on Fatal Opioid-Related Overdose Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1