Facing Nuclear Risks: Lessons from the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

Koichi Hasegawa
{"title":"Facing Nuclear Risks: Lessons from the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster","authors":"Koichi Hasegawa","doi":"10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01164.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the sociological lessons learnt from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident that occurred on 11 March 2011. This disaster is the second largest nuclear accident after the Chernobyl accident. Meltdown and explosions occurred because of the hydrogen released from the damaged core. A large amount of radioactive materials has been released. Many people, around 150 000, are still in evacuation by government order or by their own choice. The incident has several characteristics. First, it is the first severe accident of a nuclear power station, the complex disaster being triggered by a large earthquake and tsunami. Second, the four reactors were simultaneously endangered. Third, the uncontrolled situation of the melted-down reactors has continued for more than 9 months. Fourth, it is the first severe accident of a nuclear power plant on the coast. Scientists are worried about serious contamination of seawater and damages to the ecosystem. This accident is a human disaster which an electric company and the national government are very much responsible for due to a series of “underestimates,” such as that of the height of a possible tsunami, the possibility of a “station blackout” and lengthy periods of no AC power. A lot of confusing and misleading information, along with the deliberate concealment of information and delay in information disclosure occurred. Located in the background of all of this is the “Atomic Circle,” a very closed relationship between politicians, government, academics, industry and the media. We should try and learn from all of this in building a post-nuclear East Asia. This would be the greatest lesson from the tragic Fukushima disaster and the greatest message to East Asia, the world and future generations.","PeriodicalId":43424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Japanese Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01164.X","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Japanese Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01164.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

This paper discusses the sociological lessons learnt from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident that occurred on 11 March 2011. This disaster is the second largest nuclear accident after the Chernobyl accident. Meltdown and explosions occurred because of the hydrogen released from the damaged core. A large amount of radioactive materials has been released. Many people, around 150 000, are still in evacuation by government order or by their own choice. The incident has several characteristics. First, it is the first severe accident of a nuclear power station, the complex disaster being triggered by a large earthquake and tsunami. Second, the four reactors were simultaneously endangered. Third, the uncontrolled situation of the melted-down reactors has continued for more than 9 months. Fourth, it is the first severe accident of a nuclear power plant on the coast. Scientists are worried about serious contamination of seawater and damages to the ecosystem. This accident is a human disaster which an electric company and the national government are very much responsible for due to a series of “underestimates,” such as that of the height of a possible tsunami, the possibility of a “station blackout” and lengthy periods of no AC power. A lot of confusing and misleading information, along with the deliberate concealment of information and delay in information disclosure occurred. Located in the background of all of this is the “Atomic Circle,” a very closed relationship between politicians, government, academics, industry and the media. We should try and learn from all of this in building a post-nuclear East Asia. This would be the greatest lesson from the tragic Fukushima disaster and the greatest message to East Asia, the world and future generations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对核风险:福岛核灾难的教训
本文讨论了从2011年3月11日发生的福岛核电站事故中吸取的社会学教训。这场灾难是继切尔诺贝利事故之后的第二大核事故。由于损坏的堆芯释放出氢气,熔毁和爆炸发生了。大量的放射性物质被释放出来。大约15万人仍在按照政府命令或他们自己的选择撤离。这一事件有几个特点。首先,这是核电站发生的第一起严重事故,是由大地震和海啸引发的复杂灾难。其次,四座反应堆同时处于危险之中。第三,堆芯熔毁失控的局面已经持续了9个多月。第四,这是沿海核电站发生的第一起严重事故。科学家们担心海水会受到严重污染,生态系统会受到破坏。这次事故是一场人类灾难,电力公司和国家政府对此负有很大责任,因为一系列的“低估”,如可能发生的海啸的高度,“车站停电”的可能性以及长时间没有交流电源。大量混淆和误导信息,以及故意隐瞒信息和拖延信息披露的现象时有发生。所有这一切的背景是“原子圈”,一个政治家、政府、学术界、工业界和媒体之间非常密切的关系。在建设核后东亚的过程中,我们应该努力从中吸取教训。这将是悲惨的福岛灾难的最大教训,也是给东亚、世界和子孙后代的最大信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Tokyo's Gentrification in Context Time Difference Gentrification as a Bloodless Revolution : Class Structure and Spatial Polarization in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area after the 1980s Gentrification without Gentry in a Declining Global City?: Vertical Expansion of Tokyo and Its Urban Meaning 1 Recentralization of Tokyo: Contradiction and Political Struggle for Regional Policy in Japan Rethinking Gentrification and the Right to the City: The Process and Effect of the Urban Social Movement against Redevelopment in Tokyo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1