Challenges in Counter‐disaster Measures for People with Functional Needs in Times of Disaster Following the Great East Japan Earthquake

S. Tatsuki
{"title":"Challenges in Counter‐disaster Measures for People with Functional Needs in Times of Disaster Following the Great East Japan Earthquake","authors":"S. Tatsuki","doi":"10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01158.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes the three major challenges that were identified and their possible solutions are proposed in counter-disaster measures for \"people with functional needs in times of disaster (PFND)\" following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. First, recent developments in preparedness mea- sures for PFND in Japan have been uncritically relying on the assumption that hazard maps represent \"correct\" estimates of future hazardous events, which are based on the maximum probable event (MPrE) framework. In reality, however, a maximum possible event (MPoE) has occurred in the Tohoku regions. This has tremendous implications for fundamentally re-thinking the entire hazard estimation process from a MPr Et o MPoE framework. Second, counter-disaster measures for PFND have focused mainly on warning and neighborhood-based evacuation assistance activities. Needs for shelters and temporary housing units that were specially designated for PFND arose following the earthquake. However, their provisions were neither systematic nor universal due to the lack of pre-planning. More detailed guidelines for specially designated shelter and temporary housing operations need to be developed in order to address this issue. Third, people with disabilities (PWD) became invisible in shelters and communities or in the eyes of local government administrators. This was due to the fact that a majority of PWD did not ask for help in evacuation shelters because they felt general shelters were not \"barrier free\" and were unrespon- sive to their functional needs. Furthermore, many local government administra- tors felt hesitant to release their PFND registry to non-governmental and self-help organizations that were eager to check the whereabouts and current situations of PWD. This was due to the fear of breaking the Personal Information Protection Bylaw despite the fact that the bylaw provided exceptional conditions, where the onset of disaster was clearly one of these exceptional conditions. Further elabo- ration and education on the use of personal information of PFND during a disaster period is needed among public and local government administrators. ijjs_1158 12..20","PeriodicalId":43424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Japanese Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01158.X","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Japanese Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-6781.2012.01158.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This article describes the three major challenges that were identified and their possible solutions are proposed in counter-disaster measures for "people with functional needs in times of disaster (PFND)" following the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. First, recent developments in preparedness mea- sures for PFND in Japan have been uncritically relying on the assumption that hazard maps represent "correct" estimates of future hazardous events, which are based on the maximum probable event (MPrE) framework. In reality, however, a maximum possible event (MPoE) has occurred in the Tohoku regions. This has tremendous implications for fundamentally re-thinking the entire hazard estimation process from a MPr Et o MPoE framework. Second, counter-disaster measures for PFND have focused mainly on warning and neighborhood-based evacuation assistance activities. Needs for shelters and temporary housing units that were specially designated for PFND arose following the earthquake. However, their provisions were neither systematic nor universal due to the lack of pre-planning. More detailed guidelines for specially designated shelter and temporary housing operations need to be developed in order to address this issue. Third, people with disabilities (PWD) became invisible in shelters and communities or in the eyes of local government administrators. This was due to the fact that a majority of PWD did not ask for help in evacuation shelters because they felt general shelters were not "barrier free" and were unrespon- sive to their functional needs. Furthermore, many local government administra- tors felt hesitant to release their PFND registry to non-governmental and self-help organizations that were eager to check the whereabouts and current situations of PWD. This was due to the fear of breaking the Personal Information Protection Bylaw despite the fact that the bylaw provided exceptional conditions, where the onset of disaster was clearly one of these exceptional conditions. Further elabo- ration and education on the use of personal information of PFND during a disaster period is needed among public and local government administrators. ijjs_1158 12..20
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东日本大地震后,有功能需要的人在灾后应对措施中的挑战
本文描述了2011年东日本大地震后确定的三个主要挑战,并提出了针对“灾难时期有功能需求的人(PFND)”的抗灾措施的可能解决方案。首先,日本PFND准备措施的最新发展不加批判地依赖于危险图代表基于最大可能事件(MPrE)框架的对未来危险事件的“正确”估计的假设。然而,在现实中,东北地区发生了最大可能事件(MPoE)。这对于从MPr Et到MPoE框架从根本上重新思考整个危害评估过程具有巨大的意义。第二,PFND的抗灾措施主要集中在预警和以社区为基础的疏散援助活动。地震发生后,对专门为PFND指定的庇护所和临时住房单位的需求增加了。但是,由于缺乏预先规划,这些规定既不是系统的,也不是普遍的。为了解决这个问题,需要为特别指定的住房和临时住房业务制定更详细的准则。第三,残疾人在收容所、社区或地方政府管理者的眼中变得无足轻重。这是由于大多数残疾人士没有在疏散避难所寻求帮助,因为他们觉得一般避难所不是“无障碍的”,也不能满足他们的功能需要。此外,许多地方政府行政人员对向非政府组织和自助组织公布他们的PFND登记册感到犹豫,这些组织急于检查残疾人士的下落和现状。这是由于担心违反《个人信息保护细则》,尽管该细则规定了特殊条件,其中灾难的发生显然是这些特殊条件之一。需要在公共和地方政府管理人员中进一步阐述和教育在灾害期间使用PFND的个人信息。ijjs_1158 12 . . 20
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Tokyo's Gentrification in Context Time Difference Gentrification as a Bloodless Revolution : Class Structure and Spatial Polarization in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area after the 1980s Gentrification without Gentry in a Declining Global City?: Vertical Expansion of Tokyo and Its Urban Meaning 1 Recentralization of Tokyo: Contradiction and Political Struggle for Regional Policy in Japan Rethinking Gentrification and the Right to the City: The Process and Effect of the Urban Social Movement against Redevelopment in Tokyo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1