Postextractive implants in aesthetic areas: evaluation of perimplant bone remodeling over time.

M. Figliuzzi, A. Giudice, M. Cristofaro, D. Pacifico, P. Biamonte, L. Fortunato
{"title":"Postextractive implants in aesthetic areas: evaluation of perimplant bone remodeling over time.","authors":"M. Figliuzzi, A. Giudice, M. Cristofaro, D. Pacifico, P. Biamonte, L. Fortunato","doi":"10.11138/ads/2015.6.1.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nThe aim of this research was to assess peri-implant bone remodeling of post-extractive implants over 2 years.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\n30 patients meeting pre-established inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. One implant for each patient was inserted in the post-extraction sockets according to a defined surgical protocol (atramautic extraction, curettage of extraction socket, implant insertion, grafting with collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone, and a trimmed collagen membrane to completely cover the socket, suture). A temporary adhesive bridge, with an adequate profile, was bonded to the adjacent teeth. X-ray evaluation with a standardized stent was carried out at different times. Measurements were obtained from the implant edge to the bone peak. The values obtained at time 0 and at 2 years were compared by t-student test.\n\n\nRESULT\nOur results showed that after one year 73% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 20% of patient had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 7% of patient had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm of bone reabsorption. After two years 62% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 24% had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 14% had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe results showed no significant differences in bone reabsorption in most patients over 2 years.","PeriodicalId":78041,"journal":{"name":"Annali di stomatologia","volume":"6 1 1","pages":"29-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2015.6.1.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

AIM The aim of this research was to assess peri-implant bone remodeling of post-extractive implants over 2 years. MATERIAL AND METHODS 30 patients meeting pre-established inclusion criteria were enrolled for the study. One implant for each patient was inserted in the post-extraction sockets according to a defined surgical protocol (atramautic extraction, curettage of extraction socket, implant insertion, grafting with collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone, and a trimmed collagen membrane to completely cover the socket, suture). A temporary adhesive bridge, with an adequate profile, was bonded to the adjacent teeth. X-ray evaluation with a standardized stent was carried out at different times. Measurements were obtained from the implant edge to the bone peak. The values obtained at time 0 and at 2 years were compared by t-student test. RESULT Our results showed that after one year 73% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 20% of patient had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 7% of patient had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm of bone reabsorption. After two years 62% of patient had 0 mm of bone reabsorption, 24% had 0 mm ≤ x ≤ 0.5mm, 14% had 0.5 mm ≤ x ≤ 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS The results showed no significant differences in bone reabsorption in most patients over 2 years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美学区拔牙后种植体:随时间对种植体周围骨重塑的评价。
目的本研究的目的是评估2年以上种植体拔牙后种植体周围骨重塑的情况。材料与方法30例患者符合预先建立的纳入标准。根据确定的手术方案(无创伤拔牙、拔牙窝刮除、植入种植体、皮质松质猪骨移植、修剪后的胶原膜完全覆盖牙窝、缝合),将每位患者的一颗种植体植入拔牙后的牙窝。一个临时的粘接剂桥,有足够的轮廓,与邻近的牙齿粘接。采用标准化支架在不同时间进行x线评估。测量从种植体边缘到骨峰。用t-student检验比较0年和2年的数据。结果1年后73%的患者骨重吸收为0 mm, 20%的患者骨重吸收为0 mm≤x≤0.5mm, 7%的患者骨重吸收为0.5mm≤x≤2mm。2年后,62%的患者骨重吸收为0 mm, 24%的患者骨重吸收为0 mm≤x≤0.5mm, 14%的患者骨重吸收为0.5mm≤x≤2mm。结论2年后大多数患者骨重吸收无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The use of botulinum toxin for medical-aesthetic purposes in dentistry: a comparative medico-legal approach in the context of the European Union Diagnostic reliability of the Digital Imaging Fiber Optic Transillumination: a review Modern concepts in Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses (IFCDPs): from traditional solutions to current monolithic zirconia restorations. Concise review New procedures for the improvement of the SSN for a better access to dental care Squamos Odontogenic Tumor: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1