Quantitative volumetric analysis of cross-linked gutta-percha obturators.

C. Zogheib, M. Hanna, D. Pasqualini, A. Naaman
{"title":"Quantitative volumetric analysis of cross-linked gutta-percha obturators.","authors":"C. Zogheib, M. Hanna, D. Pasqualini, A. Naaman","doi":"10.11138/ads/2016.7.3.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of technique on the filling quality of 2 recently introduced obturation systems comparatively with warm vertical compaction using micro-computed tomography.\n\n\nMETHODS\n36 single-rooted teeth were selected, root canals prepared, and assigned to 3 groups (n=12), according to the filling technique: warm vertical compaction technique WVC, GuttaCore (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) and Gutta Fusion (VDW, Germany). Each specimen was scanned using a micro-CT. Percentage of voids was calculated and data statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test with a significance level of 5%.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAll obturations showed satisfactory similar results at the apical level. Differences between the three obturation methods were not significant at 1 mm (-p-value >0.05), 3 mm (-p-value >0.05) and 5 mm (-p-value >0.05). No root fillings were void-free. No significant difference was found between the WVC technique, the GuttaCore technique and the Gutta Fusion technique concerning percentage of apical voids regardless of canal level.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis study shows the efficiency of cross-linked obturators in filling root canals hermetically by comparing them to the warm vertical compaction technique. Results show that these obturation techniques were equally sufficient concerning apical adaptation making them appropriate to use in endodontic obturations.","PeriodicalId":78041,"journal":{"name":"Annali di stomatologia","volume":"7 3 1","pages":"46-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali di stomatologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2016.7.3.046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

AIM The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of technique on the filling quality of 2 recently introduced obturation systems comparatively with warm vertical compaction using micro-computed tomography. METHODS 36 single-rooted teeth were selected, root canals prepared, and assigned to 3 groups (n=12), according to the filling technique: warm vertical compaction technique WVC, GuttaCore (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK) and Gutta Fusion (VDW, Germany). Each specimen was scanned using a micro-CT. Percentage of voids was calculated and data statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS All obturations showed satisfactory similar results at the apical level. Differences between the three obturation methods were not significant at 1 mm (-p-value >0.05), 3 mm (-p-value >0.05) and 5 mm (-p-value >0.05). No root fillings were void-free. No significant difference was found between the WVC technique, the GuttaCore technique and the Gutta Fusion technique concerning percentage of apical voids regardless of canal level. CONCLUSION This study shows the efficiency of cross-linked obturators in filling root canals hermetically by comparing them to the warm vertical compaction technique. Results show that these obturation techniques were equally sufficient concerning apical adaptation making them appropriate to use in endodontic obturations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交联杜仲胶闭孔器的定量体积分析。
目的利用显微计算机断层成像技术,比较两种新近引进的充填系统与温式垂直压实技术对充填质量的影响。方法选择36颗单根牙,准备根管,根据充填技术分为3组(n=12):温垂直压实技术WVC、GuttaCore (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK)和Gutta Fusion (VDW, Germany)。每个标本用微型ct扫描。计算空洞率,采用Kruskal Wallis检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为5%。结果所有缝合方法在根尖水平均获得满意的结果。1 mm (-p-value >0.05)、3 mm (-p-value >0.05)和5 mm (-p-value >0.05) 3种封闭方法间差异无统计学意义。没有一种牙根填充物是无空隙的。无论根管水平如何,WVC技术、GuttaCore技术和Gutta Fusion技术在根尖空隙率方面无显著差异。结论本研究通过对比温式垂直压实技术和交联式闭孔器在根管密封方面的有效性。结果表明,这些封闭技术在根尖适应性方面同样充分,适合用于根管封闭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The use of botulinum toxin for medical-aesthetic purposes in dentistry: a comparative medico-legal approach in the context of the European Union Diagnostic reliability of the Digital Imaging Fiber Optic Transillumination: a review Modern concepts in Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses (IFCDPs): from traditional solutions to current monolithic zirconia restorations. Concise review New procedures for the improvement of the SSN for a better access to dental care Squamos Odontogenic Tumor: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1