Increasing volume of vestibular soft tissues in flapless implant surgery through a modified connective punch technique: a controlled clinical trial.

M. Andreasi Bassi, C. Andrisani, S. Lico, F. Silvestre, M. Gargari, C. Arcuri
{"title":"Increasing volume of vestibular soft tissues in flapless implant surgery through a modified connective punch technique: a controlled clinical trial.","authors":"M. Andreasi Bassi, C. Andrisani, S. Lico, F. Silvestre, M. Gargari, C. Arcuri","doi":"10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe aim of this article is to make a comparative assessment between the modification of the soft-tissue profile, around the healing cap screws (HCSs), following both the traditional flapless surgery (TFS) and a new modified flapless surgery, named Modified Connective Tissue Punch (MCTP) technique.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n8 patients (3M and 5F) (mean age 54.25±11.247 years) were enrolled in this study. Sixteen two-piece implants were placed on upper jaws, 2 for each patient, 8 with TFS and 8 with MCTP technique. In each patient the implants were placed in edentulous areas, of 2 or 3 adjacent teeth long. MCTP technique was performed on the front implant site (FIS) while the TFS was performed on the rear implant site (RIS). All implants were inserted and covered with healing cap screws (HCSs). Alginate impressions were carried out at the moment of the surgery, at 1 month and 4 months post-operative. Plaster models were poured and subsequently digitally scanned, in order to measure the distance between the gingival outline and the free margin of the HCS. The recorded values were analyzed with the ANOVA test.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe use of MTCP technique, in comparison to TFS, showed a significative better outcome, in terms of vertical increments, of gingiva, on the VS toward the HCSs, during the entire observation period (p = 0.000 for all).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe Authors recommend the use of MCTP technique for a better vestibular soft tissue outcome in flapless implant surgery.","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.143","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2016.9.3.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

PURPOSE The aim of this article is to make a comparative assessment between the modification of the soft-tissue profile, around the healing cap screws (HCSs), following both the traditional flapless surgery (TFS) and a new modified flapless surgery, named Modified Connective Tissue Punch (MCTP) technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS 8 patients (3M and 5F) (mean age 54.25±11.247 years) were enrolled in this study. Sixteen two-piece implants were placed on upper jaws, 2 for each patient, 8 with TFS and 8 with MCTP technique. In each patient the implants were placed in edentulous areas, of 2 or 3 adjacent teeth long. MCTP technique was performed on the front implant site (FIS) while the TFS was performed on the rear implant site (RIS). All implants were inserted and covered with healing cap screws (HCSs). Alginate impressions were carried out at the moment of the surgery, at 1 month and 4 months post-operative. Plaster models were poured and subsequently digitally scanned, in order to measure the distance between the gingival outline and the free margin of the HCS. The recorded values were analyzed with the ANOVA test. RESULTS The use of MTCP technique, in comparison to TFS, showed a significative better outcome, in terms of vertical increments, of gingiva, on the VS toward the HCSs, during the entire observation period (p = 0.000 for all). CONCLUSION The Authors recommend the use of MCTP technique for a better vestibular soft tissue outcome in flapless implant surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良结缔组织打孔技术在无瓣植入手术中增加前庭软组织体积:一项对照临床试验。
目的对传统无瓣手术(TFS)和新型改良无瓣手术(改良结缔组织打孔术(MCTP))后愈合帽螺钉(hcs)周围软组织轮廓的改变进行比较评价。材料与方法8例患者(3M和5F),平均年龄(54.25±11.247)岁。在上颌骨放置16个两片式种植体,每位患者2个,TFS 8个,MCTP 8个。在每个患者种植体放置在无牙区,2或3相邻牙齿长。MCTP技术用于种植体前部(FIS), TFS技术用于种植体后部(RIS)。所有种植体均置入并覆盖愈合帽螺钉(HCSs)。在手术时、术后1个月和4个月进行海藻酸盐印模。石膏模型被浇筑并随后进行数字扫描,以测量牙龈轮廓和HCS自由边缘之间的距离。对记录值进行方差分析。结果与TFS相比,MTCP技术的使用在整个观察期内,在朝向hcs的VS上的牙龈垂直增量方面显示出明显更好的结果(p = 0.000)。结论:作者推荐使用MCTP技术在无瓣种植手术中获得更好的前庭软组织预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ORAL and Implantology
ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of colonization of legionella spp. in dental unit waterlines. Clinical protocol with digital cad/cam chairside workflow for the rehabilitation of severely worn dentition patients. Correlations between dental malocclusions, ocular motility, and convergence disorders: a cross-sectional study in growing subjects. Obstructive site localization in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: a comparison between otolaryngologic data and cephalometric values. Prosthetic management of patients with oro-maxillo-facial defects: a long-term follow-up retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1