Effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes in reducing tooth sensitivity: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.

G. Nardi, S. Sabatini, D. Lauritano, F. Silvestre, M. Petruzzi
{"title":"Effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes in reducing tooth sensitivity: a randomized double-blind clinical trial.","authors":"G. Nardi, S. Sabatini, D. Lauritano, F. Silvestre, M. Petruzzi","doi":"10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nNinety healthy adults suffering from tooth sensitivity were divided into three groups. Two different varnishes were used for the study: Fluor Protector S, containing 7700 ppm fluoride (group I), and Cervitec F, containing 1400 ppm fluoride and 0.3% chlorhexidine (group II). A placebo containing water and ethanol was applied for the third group. Tooth sensitivity was collected according the Schiff' scale at baseline and after 30 and 90 days.\n\n\nRESULTS\nGroup I and group II improved with statistically significant results. Group III did not show any improvements.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nDesensitizing varnishes are a valid treatment for tooth hypersensitivity.","PeriodicalId":38303,"journal":{"name":"ORAL and Implantology","volume":"9 4 1","pages":"185-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORAL and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/orl/2016.9.4.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

PURPOSE The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two different desensitizing varnishes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety healthy adults suffering from tooth sensitivity were divided into three groups. Two different varnishes were used for the study: Fluor Protector S, containing 7700 ppm fluoride (group I), and Cervitec F, containing 1400 ppm fluoride and 0.3% chlorhexidine (group II). A placebo containing water and ethanol was applied for the third group. Tooth sensitivity was collected according the Schiff' scale at baseline and after 30 and 90 days. RESULTS Group I and group II improved with statistically significant results. Group III did not show any improvements. CONCLUSIONS Desensitizing varnishes are a valid treatment for tooth hypersensitivity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种不同脱敏清漆降低牙齿敏感性的有效性:一项随机双盲临床试验。
目的评价和比较两种不同的脱敏清漆的效果。材料与方法90例健康成人牙齿敏感患者分为3组。研究中使用了两种不同的清漆:氟保护剂S,含7700 ppm氟化物(第一组),Cervitec F,含1400 ppm氟化物和0.3%氯己定(第二组)。第三组使用含有水和乙醇的安慰剂。在基线和30、90 d后按希夫量表收集牙齿敏感性。结果1、2组患者疗效均有统计学意义。第三组没有任何改善。结论脱敏清漆是治疗牙齿过敏的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ORAL and Implantology
ORAL and Implantology Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment of colonization of legionella spp. in dental unit waterlines. Clinical protocol with digital cad/cam chairside workflow for the rehabilitation of severely worn dentition patients. Correlations between dental malocclusions, ocular motility, and convergence disorders: a cross-sectional study in growing subjects. Obstructive site localization in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: a comparison between otolaryngologic data and cephalometric values. Prosthetic management of patients with oro-maxillo-facial defects: a long-term follow-up retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1