Does the Kantian state dominate?: Freedom and majoritarian rule

IF 0.6 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Ratio Pub Date : 2023-03-28 DOI:10.1111/rati.12366
M. Gregory
{"title":"Does the Kantian state dominate?: Freedom and majoritarian rule","authors":"M. Gregory","doi":"10.1111/rati.12366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, scholars have criticized what they call the “Kantian-Republican” thesis of freedom as non-domination. The main complaint is that domination is unavoidable. This concern can be separated into the problem of state domination, which suggests that the state's intervening powers necessarily dominate its citizens, and the problem of majority domination, which suggests that the People necessarily dominate individual citizen as a result of the potential to form dominating majorities.","PeriodicalId":46553,"journal":{"name":"Ratio","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ratio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, scholars have criticized what they call the “Kantian-Republican” thesis of freedom as non-domination. The main complaint is that domination is unavoidable. This concern can be separated into the problem of state domination, which suggests that the state's intervening powers necessarily dominate its citizens, and the problem of majority domination, which suggests that the People necessarily dominate individual citizen as a result of the potential to form dominating majorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康德的国家占统治地位吗?:自由和多数统治
最近,学者们批评了他们称之为“康德-共和主义”的自由论,即非统治论。主要的抱怨是,统治是不可避免的。这种关注可以分为国家统治的问题,这表明国家的干预权力必然支配其公民,以及多数统治的问题,这表明人民必然统治个别公民,因为有可能形成占统治地位的多数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ratio
Ratio PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Ratio publishes work of a high quality on a wide variety of topics. It encourages articles which meet the highest standards of philosophical expertise, while at the same time remaining accessible to readers from a broad range of philosophical disciplines. The journal"s main emphasis is on analytic philosophy, but it also includes work from other traditions.
期刊最新文献
Intrinsic Properties and the Problem of “Other Things” Rejecting norms of standing for private blame The property of goal‐directedness: Lessons from the dispositions debate The limits of compromise Prime matter emergentism: Unity without reduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1