{"title":"Structural sequences and styles of subsidence in the Michigan basin","authors":"P. Howell, B. A. Pluijm","doi":"10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<0974:SSASOS>2.3.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subsidence in the Michigan basin produced ∼5 km of sedimentation over a period of more than 200 m.y. during Paleozoic time. Utilizing well-log correlations and constrained by compaction corrections and estimates of paleobathymetry, we recognize four different styles of subsidence in the basin: trough-shaped, regional tilting, narrow basin-centered, and broad basin-centered. Subsidence began as a trough-shaped, northerly extension of the Illinois basin during Late Cambrian to Early Ordovician time. This was followed by narrow, basin-centered subsidence in Early to Middle Ordovician time. Basin-centered subsidence ceased for ∼30 m.y. during long-wavelength (>1000 km) eastward tilting in Middle to Late Ordovician time, a pattern incompatible with thermal-contraction subsidence models. Basin-centered subsidence resumed in Silurian time, but with a broader distribution. A second episode of narrow, basin-centered subsidence occurred in latest Silurian through Middle Devonian time and was replaced by broad, basin-centered subsidence at the end of Middle Devonian time. The geometry of Upper Devonian and younger Paleozoic deposits suggests another eastward-tilting event, but results remain inconclusive due to erosion of strata and uncertainties in their paleobathymetry. In addition to these subsidence patterns, two distinct unconformity styles are present: basin-wide and marginal erosion. There is no evidence for significant basin-centered unconformities as predicted by purely thermal mechanisms. A history of episodic subsidence reactivations is interpreted as the result of a stress-induced, crustal-weakening mechanism for the narrow, basin-centered subsidence, whereas broad basin-centered subsidence is interpreted as thermal contraction related to lower crustal attenuation during the narrow-subsidence episodes. Recently proposed dynamic topography related to initiation of Ordovician subduction provides a driving mechanism for long-wavelength eastward tilting. Together with a temporal correlation to Appalachian tectonism, these mechanisms provide a plate tectonic framework for the history of the Michigan basin.","PeriodicalId":55104,"journal":{"name":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","volume":"111 1","pages":"974-991"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<0974:SSASOS>2.3.CO;2","citationCount":"97","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geological Society of America Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1999)111<0974:SSASOS>2.3.CO;2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97
Abstract
Subsidence in the Michigan basin produced ∼5 km of sedimentation over a period of more than 200 m.y. during Paleozoic time. Utilizing well-log correlations and constrained by compaction corrections and estimates of paleobathymetry, we recognize four different styles of subsidence in the basin: trough-shaped, regional tilting, narrow basin-centered, and broad basin-centered. Subsidence began as a trough-shaped, northerly extension of the Illinois basin during Late Cambrian to Early Ordovician time. This was followed by narrow, basin-centered subsidence in Early to Middle Ordovician time. Basin-centered subsidence ceased for ∼30 m.y. during long-wavelength (>1000 km) eastward tilting in Middle to Late Ordovician time, a pattern incompatible with thermal-contraction subsidence models. Basin-centered subsidence resumed in Silurian time, but with a broader distribution. A second episode of narrow, basin-centered subsidence occurred in latest Silurian through Middle Devonian time and was replaced by broad, basin-centered subsidence at the end of Middle Devonian time. The geometry of Upper Devonian and younger Paleozoic deposits suggests another eastward-tilting event, but results remain inconclusive due to erosion of strata and uncertainties in their paleobathymetry. In addition to these subsidence patterns, two distinct unconformity styles are present: basin-wide and marginal erosion. There is no evidence for significant basin-centered unconformities as predicted by purely thermal mechanisms. A history of episodic subsidence reactivations is interpreted as the result of a stress-induced, crustal-weakening mechanism for the narrow, basin-centered subsidence, whereas broad basin-centered subsidence is interpreted as thermal contraction related to lower crustal attenuation during the narrow-subsidence episodes. Recently proposed dynamic topography related to initiation of Ordovician subduction provides a driving mechanism for long-wavelength eastward tilting. Together with a temporal correlation to Appalachian tectonism, these mechanisms provide a plate tectonic framework for the history of the Michigan basin.
期刊介绍:
The GSA Bulletin is the Society''s premier scholarly journal, published continuously since 1890. Its first editor was William John (WJ) McGee, who was responsible for establishing much of its original style and format. Fully refereed, each bimonthly issue includes 16-20 papers focusing on the most definitive, timely, and classic-style research in all earth-science disciplines. The Bulletin welcomes most contributions that are data-rich, mature studies of broad interest (i.e., of interest to more than one sub-discipline of earth science) and of lasting, archival quality. These include (but are not limited to) studies related to tectonics, structural geology, geochemistry, geophysics, hydrogeology, marine geology, paleoclimatology, planetary geology, quaternary geology/geomorphology, sedimentary geology, stratigraphy, and volcanology. The journal is committed to further developing both the scope of its content and its international profile so that it publishes the most current earth science research that will be of wide interest to geoscientists.