“Dead but Standing Erect”: Why Southern Conference Members Left to Form the Southeastern Conference

IF 0.4 4区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Sport History Review Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1123/shr.2020-0052
J. Watkins
{"title":"“Dead but Standing Erect”: Why Southern Conference Members Left to Form the Southeastern Conference","authors":"J. Watkins","doi":"10.1123/shr.2020-0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thirteen institutions left the Southern Conference to form the Southeastern Conference during 1932. Why did these schools leave the Southern Conference? Previous historical research portrays the large size of the Southern Conference and the desire to pass academic reforms as reasons for the Southeastern Conference’s formation. This article argues that the university presidents and other administrators at Southeastern Conference institutions formed it to enhance the legitimacy of their member institutions. Throughout the Great Depression, the conference’s administrators pursued increased legitimacy by attempting to reform academic eligibility rules, allowing football games to be broadcast over the radio, awarding athletic scholarships, allowing member institutions to compete in emerging postseason football bowl games, and hiring a commissioner. This instance of conference realignment is historically significant because some of the policies implemented by the Southeastern Conference contributed to its rise as one of the top revenue-generating conferences in college athletics.","PeriodicalId":42546,"journal":{"name":"Sport History Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/shr.2020-0052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thirteen institutions left the Southern Conference to form the Southeastern Conference during 1932. Why did these schools leave the Southern Conference? Previous historical research portrays the large size of the Southern Conference and the desire to pass academic reforms as reasons for the Southeastern Conference’s formation. This article argues that the university presidents and other administrators at Southeastern Conference institutions formed it to enhance the legitimacy of their member institutions. Throughout the Great Depression, the conference’s administrators pursued increased legitimacy by attempting to reform academic eligibility rules, allowing football games to be broadcast over the radio, awarding athletic scholarships, allowing member institutions to compete in emerging postseason football bowl games, and hiring a commissioner. This instance of conference realignment is historically significant because some of the policies implemented by the Southeastern Conference contributed to its rise as one of the top revenue-generating conferences in college athletics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“死而立”:南方会议成员为何离开组建东南会议
1932年,十三所大学离开了南方会议,组成了东南会议。为什么这些学校离开了南方会议?先前的历史研究将南方会议的庞大规模和通过学术改革的愿望描绘为东南会议形成的原因。本文认为,东南会议机构的大学校长和其他管理人员为了提高其成员机构的合法性而组建了东南会议机构。在整个大萧条时期,联合会的管理者试图通过改革学术资格规则、允许足球比赛通过广播播出、颁发体育奖学金、允许成员机构在新兴的季后赛橄榄球碗比赛中竞争、以及雇用一名委员来提高合法性。这次联盟调整的实例具有历史意义,因为东南联盟实施的一些政策使其成为大学体育运动中创收最多的会议之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
The Black Athlete as Hero: American Barrier Breakers From Nine Sports Pull Hard!: Finding Grit and Purpose on Cougar Crew, 1970–2020 A Runner’s Journey The Birth and Development of Sports Video Games From the 1950s to the Early 1980s Contributors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1