Aorto-Uni-Iliac Stent Grafts with and without Crossover Femorofemoral Bypass for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Parallel Observational Comparative Study

IF 1.1 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE International Journal of Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2015-12-03 DOI:10.1155/2015/962078
M. Elkassaby, M. Alawy, M. Ali, W. Tawfick, S. Sultan
{"title":"Aorto-Uni-Iliac Stent Grafts with and without Crossover Femorofemoral Bypass for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Parallel Observational Comparative Study","authors":"M. Elkassaby, M. Alawy, M. Ali, W. Tawfick, S. Sultan","doi":"10.1155/2015/962078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated the safety and efficacy of primary aorto-uni-iliac (AUI) endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) without fem-fem crossover in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and concomitant aortoiliac occlusive disease. 537 EVARs were implemented between 2002 and 2015 in University Hospital Galway, a tertiary referral center for aortic surgery and EVAR. We executed a parallel observational comparative study between 34 patients with AUI with femorofemoral crossover (group A) and six patients treated with AUI but without the crossover (group B). Group B patients presented with infrarenal AAAs with associated total occlusion of one iliac axis and high comorbidities. Technical success was 97% (n = 33) in group A and 85% (n = 5) in group B (P = 0.31). Primary and assisted clinical success at 24 months were 88% (n = 30) and 12% (n = 4), respectively, in group A, and 85% (n = 5) and 15% (n = 1), respectively, in group B (P = 0.125). Reintervention rate was 10% (n = 3) in group A and 0% in group B (P = 0.084). No incidence of postoperative critical lower limb ischemia or amputations occurred in the follow-up period. AUI without crossover bypass is a viable option in selected cases.","PeriodicalId":14448,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/962078","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/962078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We investigated the safety and efficacy of primary aorto-uni-iliac (AUI) endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) without fem-fem crossover in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and concomitant aortoiliac occlusive disease. 537 EVARs were implemented between 2002 and 2015 in University Hospital Galway, a tertiary referral center for aortic surgery and EVAR. We executed a parallel observational comparative study between 34 patients with AUI with femorofemoral crossover (group A) and six patients treated with AUI but without the crossover (group B). Group B patients presented with infrarenal AAAs with associated total occlusion of one iliac axis and high comorbidities. Technical success was 97% (n = 33) in group A and 85% (n = 5) in group B (P = 0.31). Primary and assisted clinical success at 24 months were 88% (n = 30) and 12% (n = 4), respectively, in group A, and 85% (n = 5) and 15% (n = 1), respectively, in group B (P = 0.125). Reintervention rate was 10% (n = 3) in group A and 0% in group B (P = 0.084). No incidence of postoperative critical lower limb ischemia or amputations occurred in the follow-up period. AUI without crossover bypass is a viable option in selected cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经股股交叉搭桥或不经股股交叉搭桥治疗腹主动脉瘤:平行观察比较研究
我们研究了腹主动脉瘤(AAA)合并主动脉-髂闭塞性疾病患者的原发性主动脉-单髂(AUI)血管内主动脉修复(EVAR)无fem-fem交叉的安全性和有效性。2002年至2015年间,537例EVAR在高威大学医院实施,该医院是主动脉手术和EVAR的三级转诊中心。我们对34例合并股股交叉的AUI患者(a组)和6例合并AUI但未合并交叉的患者(B组)进行了平行观察性比较研究。B组患者表现为伴一条髂轴全闭塞的肾下AAAs和高合并症。A组技术成功率为97% (n = 33), B组为85% (n = 5) (P = 0.31)。24个月时,A组的主要和辅助临床成功率分别为88% (n = 30)和12% (n = 4), B组分别为85% (n = 5)和15% (n = 1) (P = 0.125)。A组再干预率为10% (n = 3), B组为0% (P = 0.084)。随访期间未发生术后严重下肢缺血或截肢。在某些情况下,无交叉旁路的AUI是可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
International Journal of Vascular Medicine PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors Associated With Postoperative Complications Following Endovenous Laser Ablation for Varicose Veins. Association of Anatomical Location and Preoperative Blood Biomarkers With Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation in Hemodialysis Patients. Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Findings for Takayasu Arteritis: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis. Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections and Complications: A Narrative Literature Review of Vascular Care and Maintenance. Tracing the Rise of Galectin-3: A Global Bibliometric Insight Into Its Role in Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1