Comparison of Ticlopidine and Aspirin versus Clopidogrel and Aspirin after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in High-Risk Patients

P. di Pasquale, S. Cannizzaro, S. Scalzo, F. Giambanco, G. Tricoli, S. Fasullo, S. Paterna
{"title":"Comparison of Ticlopidine and Aspirin versus Clopidogrel and Aspirin after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in High-Risk Patients","authors":"P. di Pasquale, S. Cannizzaro, S. Scalzo, F. Giambanco, G. Tricoli, S. Fasullo, S. Paterna","doi":"10.1159/000089598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Studies have shown that ticlopidine and clopidogrel in association with aspirin reduce the short- and long-term incidence of major adverse coronary events in patients undergoing stent implantation. Furthermore, clopidogrel seems to show a better side-effect profile than ticlopidine, and recent evidence supports its efficacy in long-term prevention in high-risk patients. Methods: From May 2002 to December 2003, 428 consecutive patients with 1st coronary event underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. All patients received a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and were randomized in double-blind fashion to ticlopidine (500 mg/day) + aspirin or clopidogrel (75 mg/day) + aspirin before PCI. After 48– 72 h, PCI with stent implantation was performed and the treatment was continued for 6 months. Two groups were obtained. The clopidogrel group contained 214 patients (146 M/68 F), mean age 61.3 ± 11.8 years, and the ticlopidine group contained 214 patients (150 M/64 F), mean age 60.7 ± 10.5 years. A protocol that included clinical follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months was used. Results: Both groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. We observed 14 cases of non-cardiac side effects in the clopidogrel group in the first 30 days after discharge. The ticlopidine group showed 20 non-cardiac side effects (not significant). None of the patients died during the follow-up. Both groups were similar in number of diseased vessels and number of stents. During follow-up (180 days), 48 patients from the clopidogrel group and 44 from the ticlopidine group showed reocclusion in vessels treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (p value not significant). In addition, we observed that reocclusion was mostly evidenced in the first 90 days (44 from the clopidogrel and 40 from the ticlopidine group). In the remaining time (90 days), we observed only 4 cases of reocclusion from the clopidogrel and 4 cases from the ticlopidine group. Conclusion: Our data suggest that ticlopidine or clopidogrel associated with aspirin determine similar effects.","PeriodicalId":87985,"journal":{"name":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","volume":"5 1","pages":"187 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000089598","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000089598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that ticlopidine and clopidogrel in association with aspirin reduce the short- and long-term incidence of major adverse coronary events in patients undergoing stent implantation. Furthermore, clopidogrel seems to show a better side-effect profile than ticlopidine, and recent evidence supports its efficacy in long-term prevention in high-risk patients. Methods: From May 2002 to December 2003, 428 consecutive patients with 1st coronary event underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. All patients received a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and were randomized in double-blind fashion to ticlopidine (500 mg/day) + aspirin or clopidogrel (75 mg/day) + aspirin before PCI. After 48– 72 h, PCI with stent implantation was performed and the treatment was continued for 6 months. Two groups were obtained. The clopidogrel group contained 214 patients (146 M/68 F), mean age 61.3 ± 11.8 years, and the ticlopidine group contained 214 patients (150 M/64 F), mean age 60.7 ± 10.5 years. A protocol that included clinical follow-up at 1, 3 and 6 months was used. Results: Both groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. We observed 14 cases of non-cardiac side effects in the clopidogrel group in the first 30 days after discharge. The ticlopidine group showed 20 non-cardiac side effects (not significant). None of the patients died during the follow-up. Both groups were similar in number of diseased vessels and number of stents. During follow-up (180 days), 48 patients from the clopidogrel group and 44 from the ticlopidine group showed reocclusion in vessels treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (p value not significant). In addition, we observed that reocclusion was mostly evidenced in the first 90 days (44 from the clopidogrel and 40 from the ticlopidine group). In the remaining time (90 days), we observed only 4 cases of reocclusion from the clopidogrel and 4 cases from the ticlopidine group. Conclusion: Our data suggest that ticlopidine or clopidogrel associated with aspirin determine similar effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高危患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后噻氯匹定和阿司匹林与氯吡格雷和阿司匹林的比较
背景:研究表明噻氯匹定和氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林可降低支架植入术患者主要不良冠脉事件的短期和长期发生率。此外,氯吡格雷似乎比噻氯匹定的副作用更小,最近的证据支持其对高危患者的长期预防效果。方法:2002年5月至2003年12月,连续428例首次冠状动脉事件患者行非st段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。所有患者均接受糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂治疗,并在PCI前以双盲方式随机分为噻氯匹定(500 mg/天)+阿司匹林或氯吡格雷(75 mg/天)+阿司匹林。术后48 ~ 72 h行PCI合并支架植入术,持续治疗6个月。分为两组。氯吡格雷组214例(146 M/68 F),平均年龄61.3±11.8岁;噻氯匹定组214例(150 M/64 F),平均年龄60.7±10.5岁。采用的方案包括1、3和6个月的临床随访。结果:两组的基线特征具有可比性。我们观察到14例氯吡格雷组患者在出院后30天内出现非心脏性副作用。噻氯匹定组有20个非心脏副作用(无统计学意义)。随访期间没有患者死亡。两组病变血管数量和支架数量相似。随访180天,氯吡格雷组48例、噻氯匹定组44例经皮冠状动脉腔内成形术后血管再闭塞(p值无统计学意义)。此外,我们观察到牙合主要发生在前90天(氯吡格雷组44例,噻氯匹定组40例)。在剩余时间(90天)中,我们仅观察到氯吡格雷组和噻氯匹定组的4例再闭塞。结论:我们的数据表明噻氯匹定或氯吡格雷与阿司匹林联合使用具有相似的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety of Bone Marrow Stem Cell Mobilization Induced by Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor: 30 Days’ Blinded Clinical Results from the Stem Cells in Myocardial Infarction (STEMMI) Trial Rationale and Design of the OACIS-LIPID Study That Evaluates Early Use of Pravastatin in Acute Myocardial Infarction Hyperglycemia after Acute Ischemic Stroke: Prediction, Significance and Immediate Control with Insulin-Potassium-Saline-Magnesium Infusions Nicorandil – Review of Pharmacological Properties and Clinical Applications Can Statins Be Considered as a Tertiary Level Agent in Patients with Failure of Conventional Oral Hypoglycemic Agents?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1