Opinion Formation Dynamics with Contrarians and Zealots

Kaitlyn Eekhoff
{"title":"Opinion Formation Dynamics with Contrarians and Zealots","authors":"Kaitlyn Eekhoff","doi":"10.1137/18S017314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mean-field type ODE models for opinion dynamics often assume that the entire population is comprised of congregators, who are agreeable. On the other hand, a contrarian opinion dynamics ODE model assumes the population has two personality types: congregators, and contrarians, who are disagreeable. In this paper we broadly study how contrarians influence the ability of the population to form a fixed and stable opinion. In particular, we re-examine the dynamics associated with the model introduced by Tanabe and Masuda [12] by looking at how the parameters effect the formation of stable periodic solutions (whose existence implies there is no fixed consensus opinion). Afterwards, we refine and analyze the model under two new hypotheses: (a) the contrarians bow to peer pressure and change their personality type to congregators if a large enough proportion of the entire population agrees on an opinion, and (b) there are zealots associated with one of the opinions. We conclude with a brief discussion on possible extensions of this work.","PeriodicalId":93373,"journal":{"name":"SIAM undergraduate research online","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM undergraduate research online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/18S017314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Mean-field type ODE models for opinion dynamics often assume that the entire population is comprised of congregators, who are agreeable. On the other hand, a contrarian opinion dynamics ODE model assumes the population has two personality types: congregators, and contrarians, who are disagreeable. In this paper we broadly study how contrarians influence the ability of the population to form a fixed and stable opinion. In particular, we re-examine the dynamics associated with the model introduced by Tanabe and Masuda [12] by looking at how the parameters effect the formation of stable periodic solutions (whose existence implies there is no fixed consensus opinion). Afterwards, we refine and analyze the model under two new hypotheses: (a) the contrarians bow to peer pressure and change their personality type to congregators if a large enough proportion of the entire population agrees on an opinion, and (b) there are zealots associated with one of the opinions. We conclude with a brief discussion on possible extensions of this work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与逆势者和狂热者的意见形成动力学
意见动态的平均场型ODE模型通常假设整个人口由合群者组成,他们是随和的。另一方面,反向意见动态ODE模型假设人群有两种性格类型:聚集者和不讨人喜欢的反向者。在本文中,我们广泛地研究了逆势者如何影响群体形成固定和稳定意见的能力。特别是,我们通过观察参数如何影响稳定周期解(其存在意味着没有固定的一致意见)的形成,重新检查了与Tanabe和Masuda[12]引入的模型相关的动力学。之后,我们在两个新的假设下对模型进行了改进和分析:(a)如果整个人口中有足够大的比例同意某一观点,那么逆势者就会屈服于同伴压力,并将他们的性格类型转变为聚众者;(b)存在与其中一种观点相关的狂热者。最后,我们对这项工作的可能扩展作一个简短的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symmetry and Free Boundary Points in a Class of Linear Ordinary Differential Equations Food Deserts and k-Means Clustering Numerical Analysis of Crowding Effects in Competing Species Opinion Dynamics with Slowly Evolving Zealot Populations Comparison of Vector Voting Rules and Their Relation to Simple Majority Voting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1