Neural Network Approach to NFL Position Classification

Sithija Manage
{"title":"Neural Network Approach to NFL Position Classification","authors":"Sithija Manage","doi":"10.1137/21s1444485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With an ever-increasing captivation of the United States sports-viewing audience, the National Football League continues to produce some of the world’s most capable, physical athletes. In this work, athletes’ positions C, OG, OT, DE, and DT were categorized as on the line , while the remaining positions were categorized as not on the line . In this work, a predictive neural network is applied to classify 2,022 National Football League players into the two classifications using scouting combine data of height, weight, and 40-Yard dash time, outperforming the current standard logistic regression. The two measures utilized to compare the strength of the methods were total accuracy and area under ROC curve, with the neural network yielding a slightly higher average in both. In terms of total accuracy, the neural network had an accuracy of 0.9134 to the logistic model’s 0.9065, and in terms of area under ROC curve, the neural network had an area of 0.9578 compared to the logistic model’s 0.9567. As a head-to-head iteration-wise comparison, the neural network had a winning Win-Loss-Tie ratio of 7-2-1 and 5-5-0 in the two measures respectively.","PeriodicalId":93373,"journal":{"name":"SIAM undergraduate research online","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM undergraduate research online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/21s1444485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With an ever-increasing captivation of the United States sports-viewing audience, the National Football League continues to produce some of the world’s most capable, physical athletes. In this work, athletes’ positions C, OG, OT, DE, and DT were categorized as on the line , while the remaining positions were categorized as not on the line . In this work, a predictive neural network is applied to classify 2,022 National Football League players into the two classifications using scouting combine data of height, weight, and 40-Yard dash time, outperforming the current standard logistic regression. The two measures utilized to compare the strength of the methods were total accuracy and area under ROC curve, with the neural network yielding a slightly higher average in both. In terms of total accuracy, the neural network had an accuracy of 0.9134 to the logistic model’s 0.9065, and in terms of area under ROC curve, the neural network had an area of 0.9578 compared to the logistic model’s 0.9567. As a head-to-head iteration-wise comparison, the neural network had a winning Win-Loss-Tie ratio of 7-2-1 and 5-5-0 in the two measures respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经网络在NFL位置分类中的应用
随着越来越多的美国体育观众着迷,美国国家橄榄球联盟继续培养出一些世界上最有能力、身体素质最好的运动员。在这项工作中,运动员的C、OG、OT、DE和DT位置被归类为在线,其余位置被归类为非在线。在这项工作中,应用预测神经网络,利用身高、体重和40码冲刺时间的球探组合数据,将2022名美国国家橄榄球联盟球员分为两类,优于目前标准的逻辑回归。用于比较两种方法的强度的两个指标是总精度和ROC曲线下的面积,神经网络在这两个方面的平均值略高。在总准确率方面,神经网络的准确率为0.9134,而logistic模型的准确率为0.9065;在ROC曲线下面积方面,神经网络的准确率为0.9578,而logistic模型的准确率为0.9567。作为正面迭代比较,神经网络在两个度量中的胜败比分别为7-2-1和5-5-0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Symmetry and Free Boundary Points in a Class of Linear Ordinary Differential Equations Food Deserts and k-Means Clustering Numerical Analysis of Crowding Effects in Competing Species Opinion Dynamics with Slowly Evolving Zealot Populations Comparison of Vector Voting Rules and Their Relation to Simple Majority Voting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1