TARIFF RETALIATION AND THE FREE TRADE ARGUMENT

IF 0.4 Q4 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS International Game Theory Review Pub Date : 2007-12-01 DOI:10.1142/S0219198907001643
José Méndez Naya, Luciano Méndez Naya
{"title":"TARIFF RETALIATION AND THE FREE TRADE ARGUMENT","authors":"José Méndez Naya, Luciano Méndez Naya","doi":"10.1142/S0219198907001643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effects of tariff wars on welfare are analysed for the case of trade between two countries with outputs of the traded good given exogenously. Assuming mild conditions, it is shown that if there are non-zero tariffs for which welfare-maximizing equilibrium holds, then free trade is not strictly preferable when the countries' outputs are equal, and if they are not equal is strictly disadvantageous to the country with the smaller output. Therefore, the main result of the paper is that free trade is not sustainable in an asymmetric context nor in a symmetric situation.","PeriodicalId":45451,"journal":{"name":"International Game Theory Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S0219198907001643","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Game Theory Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198907001643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The effects of tariff wars on welfare are analysed for the case of trade between two countries with outputs of the traded good given exogenously. Assuming mild conditions, it is shown that if there are non-zero tariffs for which welfare-maximizing equilibrium holds, then free trade is not strictly preferable when the countries' outputs are equal, and if they are not equal is strictly disadvantageous to the country with the smaller output. Therefore, the main result of the paper is that free trade is not sustainable in an asymmetric context nor in a symmetric situation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关税报复和自由贸易的争论
本文分析了关税战对两国间贸易的影响,其中贸易商品的产出是外生的。假设条件温和,结果表明,如果存在非零关税且福利最大化均衡成立,那么当两国的产出相等时,自由贸易并不是严格可取的,如果两国的产出不相等,则自由贸易对产出较小的国家严格不利。因此,本文的主要结论是,自由贸易在不对称的背景下和对称的情况下都是不可持续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Game Theory Review
International Game Theory Review MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Rapid developments in technology, communication, industrial organization, economic integration, political reforms and international trade have made it increasingly imperative to recognize the causes and effects of strategic interdependencies and interactions. A strategic approach to decision-making is crucial in areas such as trade negotiations, foreign and domestic investments, capital accumulation, pollution control, market integration, regional cooperation, development and implementation of new technology, arms control, international resource extraction, network sharing, and competitive marketing. Since its inception, game theory has contributed significantly to the foundations of decision-making.
期刊最新文献
Research on the Game Model of Green Technology Investment in a Two-Echelon Manufacturing Supply Chain Under Carbon Tax Regulation Optimal Goods Production Subject to Emissions Trading with Price Floor Subgame-Consistent Cooperative Equilibria of Multi-Objective Dynamic Games The Marriage Game Revisited: New Insights about Domestic Labour, Divorces and Men's Expectations about Marriage Varying weights of marginal contributions: One approach to solving the low-risk puzzle?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1