A Discriminative Analysis of Gong-yi and Ci-shan: A Literature Review

IF 0.4 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION China Nonprofit Review Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1163/18765149-12341370
Mengmiao Chen
{"title":"A Discriminative Analysis of Gong-yi and Ci-shan: A Literature Review","authors":"Mengmiao Chen","doi":"10.1163/18765149-12341370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nHow to discriminate the two Chinese terms for “public benefit” (gong-yi) and “charity” (ci-shan) has been an oft-discussed topic on which academic circles are yet to reach consensus. This paper sorts out systematically the existing literature comparing and analyzing gong-yi (“public benefit”) and ci-shan (“charity”), reviews it in light of their origins, their roots in cultural and intellectual history, their meanings and their associations, and summarizes views the academic circles generally hold, hoping to provide reference for further academic discussions.","PeriodicalId":41661,"journal":{"name":"China Nonprofit Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"42-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18765149-12341370","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Nonprofit Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341370","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How to discriminate the two Chinese terms for “public benefit” (gong-yi) and “charity” (ci-shan) has been an oft-discussed topic on which academic circles are yet to reach consensus. This paper sorts out systematically the existing literature comparing and analyzing gong-yi (“public benefit”) and ci-shan (“charity”), reviews it in light of their origins, their roots in cultural and intellectual history, their meanings and their associations, and summarizes views the academic circles generally hold, hoping to provide reference for further academic discussions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“公义”与“慈山”辨析:文献综述
如何区分“公益”和“慈善”这两个中文词汇,一直是学术界争论不休、尚未达成共识的话题。本文系统梳理了已有比较分析公益与慈善的文献,从公益与慈善的渊源、文化思想史根源、意义与关联等方面进行了梳理,并总结了学术界普遍持有的观点,希望为进一步的学术讨论提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
China Nonprofit Review
China Nonprofit Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
336
期刊最新文献
Excluded from Political Task: NGO s’ Marginalized Participation in China’s Accurate Poverty Alleviation Project Retrospective Observations on “Legitimacy” of Charitable Fundraising amid COVID-19 Community Resilience: A New Theme in Modernizing Community-Level Governance System and Capability in China Regulating Emergency Volunteer Management to Promote the Development of Emergency Response Voluntary Services Is It a “Window of Opportunity” to Develop a New Normal of Government-Society Cooperation in Emergency Management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1