Sounds prevent selective monitoring of high spatial frequency channels in vision

Alexis Pérez-Bellido, Joan López-Moliner, S. Soto-Faraco
{"title":"Sounds prevent selective monitoring of high spatial frequency channels in vision","authors":"Alexis Pérez-Bellido, Joan López-Moliner, S. Soto-Faraco","doi":"10.1163/187847612X646622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior knowledge about the spatial frequency (SF) of upcoming visual targets (Gabor patches) speeds up average reaction times and decreases standard deviation. This has often been regarded as evidence for a multichannel processing of SF in vision. Multisensory research, on the other hand, has often reported the existence of sensory interactions between auditory and visual signals. These interactions result in enhancements in visual processing, leading to lower sensory thresholds and/or more precise visual estimates. However, little is known about how multisensory interactions may affect the uncertainty regarding visual SF. We conducted a reaction time study in which we manipulated the uncertanty about SF (SF was blocked or interleaved across trials) of visual targets, and compared visual only versus audio–visual presentations. Surprisingly, the analysis of the reaction times and their standard deviation revealed an impairment of the selective monitoring of the SF channel by the presence of a concurrent sound. Moreover, this impairment was especially pronounced when the relevant channels were high SFs at high visual contrasts. We propose that an accessory sound automatically favours visual processing of low SFs through the magnocellular channels, thereby detracting from the potential benefits from tuning into high SF psychophysical-channels.","PeriodicalId":49553,"journal":{"name":"Seeing and Perceiving","volume":"25 1","pages":"40-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847612X646622","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seeing and Perceiving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847612X646622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior knowledge about the spatial frequency (SF) of upcoming visual targets (Gabor patches) speeds up average reaction times and decreases standard deviation. This has often been regarded as evidence for a multichannel processing of SF in vision. Multisensory research, on the other hand, has often reported the existence of sensory interactions between auditory and visual signals. These interactions result in enhancements in visual processing, leading to lower sensory thresholds and/or more precise visual estimates. However, little is known about how multisensory interactions may affect the uncertainty regarding visual SF. We conducted a reaction time study in which we manipulated the uncertanty about SF (SF was blocked or interleaved across trials) of visual targets, and compared visual only versus audio–visual presentations. Surprisingly, the analysis of the reaction times and their standard deviation revealed an impairment of the selective monitoring of the SF channel by the presence of a concurrent sound. Moreover, this impairment was especially pronounced when the relevant channels were high SFs at high visual contrasts. We propose that an accessory sound automatically favours visual processing of low SFs through the magnocellular channels, thereby detracting from the potential benefits from tuning into high SF psychophysical-channels.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声音阻止了视觉中高空间频率通道的选择性监测
对即将到来的视觉目标(Gabor斑块)的空间频率(SF)的先验知识加快了平均反应时间并降低了标准偏差。这通常被认为是视觉中SF多通道处理的证据。另一方面,多感官研究经常报道听觉和视觉信号之间存在感觉相互作用。这些相互作用导致视觉处理的增强,导致更低的感觉阈值和/或更精确的视觉估计。然而,关于多感官相互作用如何影响视觉SF的不确定性,我们知之甚少。我们进行了一项反应时间研究,在该研究中,我们操纵了视觉目标关于SF的不确定性(SF在试验中被阻断或交错),并比较了视觉和视听呈现。令人惊讶的是,对反应时间及其标准偏差的分析显示,并发声音的存在损害了对SF通道的选择性监测。此外,当相关通道在高视觉对比度下具有高SFs时,这种损伤尤其明显。我们提出,辅助声音通过大细胞通道自动地促进低SF的视觉处理,从而减损调谐到高SF的心理物理通道的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seeing and Perceiving
Seeing and Perceiving BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Chapter ten. Color Vision Chapter six. Brightness Constancy Chapter One. Our Idea of the Physical World Chapter nine. Optometrists, Ophthalmologists, Opticians: What They Do Chapter seven. Why the Rate of Unbleaching is Important
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1